P Maroto

IIB Sant Pau, Barcino, Catalonia, Spain

Are you P Maroto?

Claim your profile

Publications (37)129.33 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We aimed to analyze prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma managed by either active surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy, and to describe the long-term patterns of recurrence in both groups.
    Annals of Oncology 09/2014; · 7.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: Despite the uncertain value of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) it is clear that impaired renal function represents a contraindication to its administration. The objective of this study was to identify possible predictive clinical factors for impaired renal function following RNU in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UUT-UCC). Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 546 patients who underwent RNU between 1992 and 2008 at our institution. Data of interest for this study included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), age, pathological stage and preoperative hydronephrosis (HN). The predictive value of HN, age and pathological stage for impaired renal function after RNU was calculated by multivariate linear regression analysis. Results: In total, 138 patients met the criteria for inclusion, including 108 men (78%). Mean age at surgery was 67 ± 10 years. There was a significant correlation (p < 0.001) between pre- and postoperative eGFR (decrease of 21% after NU). Preoperative HN was present in 51 patients (37%). On linear regression analysis, preoperative eGFR ≤60 ml/min (p = 0.012; OR = 4.60) and HN (p = 0.027; OR = 10.34) were confirmed to be predictive factors for a postoperative eGFR ≤60 ml/min. When postoperative eGFR ≤45 ml/min was used as the criterion for impaired renal function, predictive factors proved to be preoperative eGFR ≤45 ml/min (p < 0.0001; OR = 18.53), HN (p = 0.038; OR = 0.380) and age ≥70 years (p < 0.0001; OR = 0.169). Conclusions: Preoperative HN, older age and preoperative eGFR <60 ml/min were proven to be predictive factors for impaired renal function after RNU. In these settings, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be considered. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    Urologia Internationalis 11/2013; · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with bone metastases from advanced cancer often experience skeletal-related events (SRE), which cause substantial pain and morbidity. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK Ligand (RANKL), is a novel bone-targeted agent with a distinct mechanism of action relative to the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid, for prevention of SRE. This pre-planned analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of denosumab versus zoledronic acid across three pivotal studies. Patient-level data from three identically designed, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trials of patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer, other solid tumours or multiple myeloma were combined. End-points included time to first SRE, time to first and subsequent (multiple) SRE, adverse events, time to disease progression and overall survival. Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in delaying time to first on-study SRE by a median 8.21months, reducing the risk of a first SRE by 17% (hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.90]; P<0.001). Efficacy was demonstrated for first and multiple events and across patient subgroups (prior SRE status; age). Disease progression and overall survival were similar between the treatments. In contrast to zoledronic acid, denosumab did not require monitoring or dose modification/withholding based on renal status, and was not associated with acute-phase reactions. Hypocalcaemia was more common for denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred at a similar rate (P=0.13). Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in preventing SRE with favourable safety and convenience in patients with bone metastases from advanced cancer.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 09/2012; 48(16):3082-92. · 4.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in the male population in Western countries, second to skin cancer. Hormonal therapy allows long-lasting and effective control of cancer-related symptoms in advanced stages; however, in almost all patients with metastatic PCa the disease will progress when it becomes castration-resistant (CRPC). Chemotherapy with docetaxel was a turning point in CRPC, as, for the first time, it resulted in an increased survival time in comparison with mitoxantrone and prednisone. Combination therapy with docetaxel and prednisone is the first-line treatment of choice. Once the cancer has progressed, there is no clear alternative, although some new agents have shown promise in the treatment of this type of cancer. This review will provide an overview of the current status of CRPC, including clinical status, prognosis, firstline treatment and new second-line treatment options.
    Clinical and Translational Oncology 03/2012; 14(3):169-76. · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hormonal therapy allows effective control of cancer-related symptoms in advanced stages. However, the disease will progress in almost all these metastatic prostate cancer patient until becoming resistant to androgen suppression. The emergence of new drugs will most probably have open up new expectations regarding the treatment of this cancer. The aim of the present review has been to provide an overview of the current status of castration-resistant prostate cancer and to share the high expectations created with the new treatments. Evidence was obtained from multidisciplinary meetings with the participation of urologists and oncologists, where they pooled the analysis of original articles in the literature and defined the content of the article. Chemotherapy with docetaxel was a turning point in castration-resistant prostate cancer after the failure of hormonal therapy failure. For the first time, it achieved increased survival time in comparison with mitoxantrone and prednisone. Combination therapy with docetaxel and prednisone is the first-line choice treatment. Once the cancer has progressed, there is no clear alternative, although some novel agents have created expectations for the treatment of this type of cancer. The range of therapeutic options for castration-resistant prostate cancer has increased dramatically with the arrival of new drugs. At present, cabazitaxel, and in the near future, abiraterone, have been found to be effective drugs in second-line treatment after progression to docetaxel, increasing survival by 2-4 months and reducing risk of death by 30-35%.
    Actas urologicas españolas 12/2011; 36(6):367-74. · 1.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION Sunitinib, an oral, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, delays disease progression, with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 2 years, improves quality of life and is becoming the first-line standard of care for metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC). PURPOSE To assess the economic value of sunitinib as fi rst-line therapy in mRCC within the Spanish healthcare system. METHODS An adapted Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was used to analyse the cost effectiveness of sunitinib vs. sorafenib (SFN) and bevacizumab/interferon-α (BEV/IFN) as first-line mRCC therapy from the Spanish third-party payer perspective. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS data from sunitinib, SFN and BEV/IFN pivotal trials were extrapolated to project survival and costs in 6-week cycles. Results, in progression-free life-years (PFLY), life years (LY) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained, expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) with costs and benefits discounted annually at 3%, were obtained using deterministic and probabilistic analyses. RESULTS Sunitinib was more effective and less costly than both SFN (gains of 0.52 PFLY, 0.16 LY, 0.17 QALY) and BEV/IFN (gains of 0.19 PFLY, 0.23 LY, 0.16 QALY) with average cost savings/patients of €1,124 and €23,218, respectively. Using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €50,000/QALY, sunitinib achieved an incremental net benefit (INB) of €9,717 and €31,211 compared with SFN and BEV/IFN, respectively. At this WTP, the probability of sunitinib providing the highest INB was 75%. CONCLUSION Our analysis suggests that sunitinib is a costeffective alternative to other targeted therapies as first-line mRCC therapy in the Spanish healthcare setting.
    Clinical and Translational Oncology 12/2011; 13(12):869-77. · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • G Sancho, P Maroto, J Palou
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has changed little in the last twenty years. The gold standard treatment is still cystectomy, but it has a significant negative impact on quality of life. Bladder-preservation strategies can be used in some cases but patient selection for this approach remains unclear. New chemotherapy and biologic agents in combination with surgery or radiotherapy could improve results and these possibilities are currently under investigation.
    Clinical and Translational Oncology 12/2011; 13(12):855-61. · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • European Journal of Cancer 09/2011; 47. · 5.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A strong rationale supports the role of antiangiogenic drugs in urothelial cancer. This trial was designed to assess the activity of sunitinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer ineligible for cisplatin and to explore molecular and imaging variables predictive of clinical benefit. This was a multicenter phase II trial with sunitinib 50 mg daily in 4/2-week schedule. Eligibility criteria were as follows: creatinine clearance 30-60 ml/min, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Pperformance Sstatus of one or less, and adequate hepatic and hematologic function. Twelve circulating cytokines were evaluated at baseline and sequentially using Luminex xMAP(®) (Austin, TX). Baseline and treatment-related changes in perfusion were evaluated in a patient subgroup using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. On intention-to-treat analysis, 38 patients showed 3 (8%) partial responses (PRs) and 19 (50%) presented with stable disease (SD), 17 (45%) of them ≥3 months. Clinical benefit (PR + SD) was 58%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 4.8 months and median overall survival 8.1 months. Toxicity was consistent with previous reports for sunitinib. Low interleukin-8 (IL-8) baseline levels were significantly associated with increased TTP. Baseline tumor contrast enhancement with >40 Hounsfield units was associated with clinical benefit. This study highlights the potential role of the angiogenic pathway as a therapy target in urothelial cancer. Baseline IL-8 serum levels and contrast enhancement of lesions warrant further study.
    Annals of Oncology 03/2011; 22(12):2646-53. · 7.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the activity and toxicity of temozolomide in a phase II multicenter trial in patients diagnosed with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors. During a recruitment period of 30 months, 20 patients received temozolomide 150 mg/m(2)/day p.o. for 5 days every 4 weeks, escalating to 200 mg/m(2)/day if grade II toxicity was not observed in the first cycle. Eligibility criteria were tumor progression or relapse after previous cisplatin and ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy, creatinine clearance of >40 ml/min, and a performance status of 0-2. The median age was 38 years (range 27-56). Seventeen patients had nonseminomatous tumors, and 3 had seminomatous tumors. Six of the patients had extragonadal primary tumors (3 retroperitoneal and 3 mediastinal). The median number of prior cisplatin-containing cycles was 11 (range 7-20). Eight patients received prior high-dose chemotherapy and 14 were refractory or absolutely refractory to cisplatin. A total of 45 cycles were administered. Two partial responses lasting 9 and 3.5 months (overall response rate 10%, 95% CI 1.2-31.7) were observed. One of these responses was seen in a patient with a cisplatin-refractory tumor that had previously been treated with high-dose chemotherapy. The median time to progression and the median overall survival were 1.5 and 3.1 months, respectively. Grade III hematological toxicity consisted of thrombocytopenia in 2 patients and anemia in 1 patient. No grade IV toxicity was observed. Temozolomide had some activity in heavily pretreated patients resistant to cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
    Oncology 01/2011; 80(3-4):219-22. · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • Value in Health 01/2009; 12(7). · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objetivo: Añadir un nuevo caso de carcinoma renal metastático de localización atípica a la literatura. La afectación cutánea metastásica de los tumores urológicos constituye una entidad clínica rara. Suelen asociarse con afectación interna por lo que su hallazgo ensombrece el pronóstico. Se revisan las localizaciones metastásicas más frecuentes, su implicación pronostica y tratamiento. Métodos: Se presenta el caso de un paciente varón de 60 años diagnosticado de metástasis cutánea en maxilar inferior a los 18 meses de la nefrectomía radical por adenocarcinoma de células claras. Resultados: El paciente fue tratado mediante la administración oral de Sorafenib en el marco de un ensayo clínico fase II. El paciente esta vivo y libre de progresión a los 2 años del diagnóstico. Conclusiones: La amplia variabilidad de localizaciones y formas de presentación del carcinoma renal metastático obligan a mantenerse alerta durante el seguimiento. Los nuevos fármacos de acción antiangiogénica constituyen una opción eficaz de tratamiento.
    Archivos españoles de urología 01/2008; 61(1).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: M-VAC (cisplatin, methotrexate, adriamycin, vinblastine) combination chemotherapy has been for long time the standard of care in fit patient with advanced urothelial tumors. Gemcitabine/cisplatin with similar results and an improved toxicity profile has proved to be a new standard alternative. Whether or not we can improve survival with newer triplet regimens will depend upon the results of ongoing phase III trials. In addition to the new active drug combinations and targeted therapies, new approaches are emerging for treatment. Chemotherapy optimization using molecular markers predicting chemosensitivity are being applied. There is an obvious need to incorporate in clinical trials a systematic translational approach to explain both our successes and our failures.
    Annals of Oncology 06/2006; 17 Suppl 5:v113-7. · 7.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Spanish Germ Cell Group is composed of 60 centres. Our challenge was to define a surveillance protocol that would be safe and suitable regardless of population size or geographic coverage. From January 1994 to January 2004, 589 patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours entered a risk-adapted surveillance protocol after orchiectomy. Patients with vascular or local invasion of adjacent structures (231/589; 39%) received two cycles of BE400P (bleomycin 30 U/week, etoposide 100 mg/m2 x4, cisplatinum 25 mg/m2 x4). Other patients (358/589; 61%) were kept on close follow-up (chest X-ray; serum tumour markers: first year every 2 months, second year every 3 months, third year every 4 months; abdominal computed tomography scans at every other outpatient control). The outcomes selected for the study were feasibility, relapse rate and number of patients lost to follow-up and mortality. Median follow-up was 40 months. In the surveillance group, 21 patients were lost to follow-up. In the chemotherapy group, two patients relapsed at 12 and 14.5 months and they are presently free of disease. In the surveillance group, 71 (19%) patients relapsed, of which 55 (71%) relapsed within the first year. Five (1.4%) patients died of their cancer. Factors associated with relapse were embryonal carcinoma and vascular invasion in patients who refused chemotherapy. Our risk-adapted surveillance protocol provided a low rate of recurrences.
    Annals of Oncology 01/2006; 16(12):1915-20. · 7.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sorafenib plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from the perspective of the Spanish National Health Service. Methods: A Markov model was developed to project the lifetime survival and costs associated with sorafenib plus BSC and BSC alone. The model tracked patients with advanced RCC through three disease states - progression free survival (PFS), progression, and death. Transition probabilities between disease states varied for each 3-month period and were obtained from a clinical trial. Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALY) gained were used as a measure of treatment effectiveness. Resource utilization included drug, administration, physician visits, monitoring, and adverse events. Costs and survival benefits were discounted annually at 3%. All costs were adjusted to 2005 Euros. Scenario sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: The lifetime per patient costs were €44,904 and €10,502 for sorafenib plus BSC and BSC alone, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of sorafenib plus BSC versus BSC alone was €37,667 per QALY gained. The key drivers of the model results were survival after progression and PFS probabilities for both treatment groups. Sensitivity analyses showed that the model results were robust to variance in sorafenib and BSC treatment costs. Conclusions: Sorafenib is a cost effective therapy in the management of advanced RCC. Sorafenib offers a unique opportunity to prolong PFS and overall survival in those patients, and has the potential of offer considerable value to patients with minimal budget impact to the NHS in Spain.
    Value in Health 01/2006; 9(6). · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: After decades of irradiation as standard therapy for clinical stage I testicular seminoma, alternative treatment approaches have emerged including postorchiectomy surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy. This study was performed to assess a dual policy of surveillance and selective single-agent carboplatin (for high-risk cases) in a multicenter setting. From 1994 to 1999, 203 patients with stage I seminoma were included. Sixty (29.6%) were considered poor-risk cases (i.e. with vascular invasion and/or pathological tumor stage pT2 or greater) and received two courses of adjuvant carboplatin, whereas 143 (70.4%) without risk criteria underwent close surveillance. Median follow-up was 52 months (range 14-92). Relapses were observed in two (3.3%) patients treated with carboplatin and in 23 patients (16.1%) on surveillance, with a median time to recurrence of 11 months (range 3.9-39.6). All relapsing patients were rendered disease-free, mainly with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Four patients died from tumor-unrelated causes. Actuarial 5-year overall survival was 96.7% and cause-specific survival was 100%. Five-year disease-free survival was 83.5% for patients on surveillance, and 96.6% for those receiving carboplatin. This dual treatment policy is feasible in a multicenter setting and preserves 70% of patients from adjuvant chemotherapy. Single-agent carboplatin is effective in reducing the relapse rate in patients with high-risk stage I seminoma. A better definition of local risk features would probably improve patient selection, thus minimizing the incidence of recurrences on surveillance.
    Annals of Oncology 07/2003; 14(6):867-72. · 7.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe the clinical characteristics and treatment results obtained with the application of a homogeneous treatment protocol in 1490 patients with germ-cell tumours (GCT) registered in the 55 hospitals belonging to the Spanish Germ-Cell Cancer Group (GG) during the period between January 1994 and April 2001. In general, surveillance was the common policy for stage I patients without local poor prognosis factors, whereas they received adjuvant chemotherapy in case those factor were present. Chemotherapy schedules used in advanced cases were cisplatin and etoposide (EP) for seminoma and BEP or BOMP-EPI in non-seminoma, according to whether the patient was in the good or poor prognosis IGCCCG (International Germ-Cell Cancer Collaborative Group) group. Excision of residual masses was mandatory in non-seminomatous germ-cell tumour (NSGCT). Initial local symptomatology was increased testis size in 90% of cases. Sonography was an excellent diagnostic tool to suggest tumour. Non-seminoma (64.2%) was more frequent than seminoma (35.8%). Approximately 10% had the antecedent of cryptorchidism. Non-seminoma patients were 7 years younger than seminoma. Right testis was involved predominantly. Pre-orchidectomy tumour markers were elevated in 21% of seminoma (betaHGC) and 79% in non-seminoma (alphaFP and/or betaHGC). Scrotum violation occurred in only 1.8%. There were significant differences among stage I and the IGCCCG prognosis groups related to a longer interval between the first symptom and orchiectomy. Eighteen percent of non-seminomatous germ-cell tumour belonged to the poor prognosis IGCCCG group. With a median follow-up to 33 months, this series has achieved a 3 year overall survival of 98% for seminoma and 94% for non-seminoma. Only 10% of excised residual masses present after chemotherapy contained malignant cells. Spanish GCT have a similar clinical pattern to that described in the other occidental countries except for a slight increased proportion of non-seminoma upon seminoma. Co-operative groups as GG are unique structures to obtain quick and wide experience on the treatment of testis tumours, contributing to achieve a high cure rate.
    European Urology 01/2003; 42(6):553-62; discussion 562-3. · 10.48 Impact Factor
  • Ejc Supplements - EJC SUPPL. 01/2003; 1(5).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report here a novel DRB1 allele identified during sequence-based HLA-DRB typing. This allele was detected during routine HLA typing of a patient and his family prior to bone marrow transplantation. The new allele, DRB1*0108, was found in the patient and in a brother. Molecular cloning and sequencing confirmed that the new DRB1 allele is identical to DRB1*0101 at exon 2 except for a single nucleotide substitution at codon 37 (TauCC-->TauAlphaC), changing the encoded serine to tyrosine. This position of the beta1 domain lies in the floor of the antigen-binding groove and shows the highest polymorphism among DRB1 alleles.
    Tissue Antigens 04/2002; 59(4):350-1. · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A multicentre phase II trial was undertaken to evaluate the activity and toxicity of docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with urothelial cancer. Thirty-eight patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder, renal pelvis or ureter received the combination of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1 and repeated every 21 days, to a maximum of six cycles. The median delivered dose-intensity was 98% (range 79-102%) of the planned dose for both drugs. There were seven complete responses and 15 partial responses, for and overall response rate of 58% (95% CI, 41-74%). Responses were even seen in three patients with hepatic metastases. The median time to progression was 6.9 months, and the median overall survival was 10.4 months. Two patients who achieved CR status remain free of disease at 4 and 3 years respectively. Grade 3-4 granulocytopenia occurred in 27 patients, resulting in five episodes of febrile neutropenia. There was one toxic death in a patient with grade 4 granulocytopenia who developed acute abdomen. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was rare (one patient). Other grade 3-4 toxicities observed were anaemia (three patients), vomiting (five patients), diarrhoea (four patients), peripheral neuropathy (two patients) and non-neutropenic infections (seven patients). Docetaxel plus cisplatin is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer, and warrants further investigation.
    British Journal of Cancer 03/2002; 86(3):326-30. · 5.08 Impact Factor

Publication Stats

371 Citations
129.33 Total Impact Points


  • 2014
    • IIB Sant Pau
      Barcino, Catalonia, Spain
  • 2011–2013
    • Autonomous University of Barcelona
      Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain
  • 1996–2012
    • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
      • Medical Oncology Services
      Barcino, Catalonia, Spain
  • 2006
    • University Hospital Vall d'Hebron
      Barcino, Catalonia, Spain
  • 2001
    • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
      Valenza, Valencia, Spain