[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Complications of pacemaker implantation include myocardial perforation, venous thrombosis, vegetations of the tricuspid valve or pacing lead, and tricuspid regurgitation. We report a patient presenting with a case of delayed ventricular lead perforation through the right ventricle. The lead was uneventfully extracted under transesophageal echocardiographic observation in the operating room with cardiac surgery backup.
Vascular Health and Risk Management 01/2010; 6:27-30.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The appearance of re-stenosis after repair of an interrupted aortic arch may be a surgical challenge due to adhesions. Here, we describe an approach using off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting techniques to reach the descending aorta through a median sternotomy in a patient with aortic arch stenosis after conduit repair. The 17-year-old patient with diagnoses of interrupted aortic arch and ventricular septal defect presented after two previous operations (one left lateral thoracotomy and one median sternotomy) with a stenosed vascular graft between ascending and descending aorta. Surgery was done via re-sternotomy without cardio-pulmonary bypass. An extraanatomic graft was used to connect ascending and descending aorta. When performing the distal anastomosis, the heart was exposed using a standard suction device. This case demonstrates that the use of modern techniques may facilitate surgical approaches dramatically. In our opinion the above-described technique is the first choice for all patients requiring arch repair following multiple previous operations, performed via sternotomy and thoracotomy.
Journal of Cardiac Surgery 07/2009; 24(5):541-3. · 1.35 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Iatrogenic nerve lesions affecting the long thoracic nerve are very rare after a median sternotomy. Here we report on a patient who developed clinical signs of a so-called "winged scapula" after an uneventful aortic valve replacement for infective endocarditis.
The Annals of thoracic surgery 05/2009; 87(4):1277-9. · 3.45 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: In the first two yr of life blood-group incompatible (ABO-incompatible) heart transplantation can be performed leading to immune tolerance to donor blood group. Antibody titers should be below 1:4. VAD use is correlated with sensitization toward blood-group antigens. A boy was diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy at nine months of age and listed for 0-compatible transplantation. Progressive heart failure required implantation of a left VAD. His listing was extended for ABO-incompatible transplantation despite antibody titers of 1:32 anti-A and 1:8 anti-B. After 26 days on VAD, he was transplanted with a B donor heart. No hyperacute or acute rejection occurred in 12 months post-transplant. Anti-B antibodies rose to a maximum of 1:2. No use of rituximab or plasmapheresis was required. There are no signs of graft vasculopathy. This indicates that inclusion criteria for ABO-incompatible transplantation may be extended to immediate cases. This is the first case with a healthy immune system to show signs of tolerance development after ABO-incompatible heart transplantation with increased prior antibody titers and without specific treatment.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Donor organ shortage in pediatric heart transplantation (HTx) is causing mortality rates of 30-50% on the waiting list. Due to immaturity of the immune system of newborns and infants, ABO-incompatible HTx may be an option to increase donor availability. We present our experience with ABO-incompatible HTx.
Three infants were transplanted ABO-incompatible since 12/2004: (1) hypoplastic left heart complex, (2) restrictive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, (3) dilative cardiomyopathy. Age at HTx was 7, 5, and 3.5 months. All recipients had blood type O, donors were A, A, and B. Informed consent was given by parents, the ethics committee, and Eurotransplant.
Preoperative isohemagglutinin titers were low (Patient 1: 1:4 for anti-A1, A2, B, Patient 2: 1:4, 1:1, 1:4 for anti-A1, A2, B, respectively, and Patient 3: 0 for all, but quick spin 1+ for all). Intraoperatively, plasma was separated from red blood cells and discarded up to six times until antibodies were eliminated. Immunosuppressive induction with ATG was started for 5 days. Basic immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Extubation was performed on days 15, 2, and 1, respectively. After a follow-up of 17, 16, and 12 months all patients are well, ventricular function is excellent without any acute rejection periods; Patient 1 is still on dialysis. Isohemagglutinin titers against donor blood type have disappeared in follow-up.
ABO-incompatible cardiac transplantation shows good short-term results in young infants and seems to be a safe procedure to lower the mortality on the waiting list.
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 04/2007; 31(3):339-43; discussion 343. · 2.67 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: In the pediatric age group shortage of donor hearts leads to mortality rates of 30-50% on the waiting list. Because of the immaturity of the immune system of infants, ABO-incompatible heart transplantation may be an option to increase donor availability. We transplanted two infants with blood type O at the age of 7 and 5 months, respectively, with complex congenital heart disease. Intraoperative plasma exchange was performed during cardiopulmonary bypass followed by standard immunosuppression. Both recipients received a blood type A donor organ. Plasma was exchanged up to six times until anti-A antibodies were eliminated. No hyperacute rejection occurred, ventricular function is excellent and there have been no acute rejection episodes up to 4 months after transplantation. Anti-A antibody titers remained low and eventually disappeared. ABO-incompatible cardiac transplantation shows good short-term results in young infants and appears to be a safe procedure to reduce mortality on the waiting list.
Transplant International 11/2005; 18(10):1210-4. · 3.16 Impact Factor