-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of these studies was to evaluate whether exposing primiparous, suckled beef cows to the biostimulatory effect of bulls alters breeding performance associated with an estrus synchronization protocol that included GnRH followed 7 d later by PGF(2alpha) and fixed-time AI (TAI). This was a composite analysis of 3 experiments that evaluated (1) the effects of bull exposure at different days after calving (yr 1); (2) the biostimulatory effects of bull excretory products (yr 2); and (3) the biostimulatory effects of familiar and unfamiliar bulls (yr 3) on the resumption of ovarian cycling activity. In all studies, cows were exposed (biostimulated; n = 94) or not exposed (nonbiostimulated; n = 67) to bulls or excretory products of bulls for at least 60 d before the beginning of the estrus synchronization protocol. Average calving day did not differ among years and was 52 +/- 5 d. Year did not affect the proportions of biostimulated and nonbiostimulated cows that were cycling at the beginning of the estrus synchronization protocol; however, a greater (P < 0.001) proportion of biostimulated than nonbiostimulated cows were cycling at this time. In each year, cows were given GnRH followed by PGF(2alpha) 7 d later. Cows were observed for estrus twice daily (am and pm) after PGF(2alpha). Cows that exhibited estrus before 54, 60, and 64 h after PGF(2alpha) were inseminated by AI 12 h later in yr 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Cows that failed to show estrus were given GnRH and TAI at 62, 72, and 72 h after PGF(2alpha) in yr 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conception rates were determined by transrectal ultrasonography 35 d after TAI in each year. The percentages of cows that exhibited estrus after PGF(2alpha) and before TAI, the interval from PGF(2alpha) to estrus, and the percentages of cows inseminated 12 h after estrus or at TAI did not differ between biostimulated and nonbiostimulated cows and were 51%, 54.7 +/- 7.3 h, 35%, and 65%, respectively. Conception rates for cows bred by AI 12 h after estrus did not differ between biostimulated and nonbiostimulated cows; however, the TAI conception rate was greater (P < 0.05) for biostimulated cows (57.6%) than for nonbiostimulated cows (35.6%). We conclude that TAI conception rates in an estrus synchronization protocol that includes GnRH followed 7 d later by PGF(2alpha) may be improved by the biostimulatory effect of bulls in postpartum, primiparous cows.
Journal of Animal Science 04/2007; 85(3):848-52. · 2.10 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this experiment was to determine if the proportion of first-calf suckled beef cows that resumed ovulatory cycles and the interval to resumption of ovarian cycling activity differ after exposure to either "unfamiliar" bulls or cows on d 35 postpartum, after exposure to either "familiar" bulls or cows for the first 30-32 d after calving. Fifty AngusxHereford cows were stratified by calving date, calf BW, and calf sex by d 3 postpartum, and assigned to be exposed to familiar epididectomized bulls (BEF; n=25) or familiar mature ovariectomized (OVX) cows (CEF; n=25). On d 35 after calving, 12 BEF cows were assigned to be exposed to unfamiliar bulls (BEU); likewise, 12 CEF cows were assigned to be exposed to unfamiliar OVX cows (CEU). Cows were in their treatments for either 95 d (BEF and CEF) or 60 d (BEU and CEU) during the experiment. Blood samples were collected every third d from the beginning to the end of the experiment. A rise in progesterone concentration of >0.5ng/mL in consecutive samples was used as the criterion for resumption of ovulatory cycles. Exposing cows to bulls on d 5 after calving and then switching a subset of these cows to be exposed to unfamiliar bulls 30-32 d later did not (P>0.10) alter: (1) the proportion of cows that resumed cycling activity; and (2) postpartum interval to resumption of ovarian cycling activity compared to cows exposed to familiar bulls. However, 32% more (P<0.05) cows exposed to bulls (BEF and BEU) resumed cycling activity by approximately 14.8 d before cows that were exposed to OVX cows (CEF and CEU). We conclude that the familiarity of first-calf cows to either bulls or ovariectomized cows, did not affect the postpartum occurrence of cycling activity or the interval from calving to resumption of ovulatory cycles. However, bull exposure, whether familiar or unfamiliar, stimulates first-calf cows to resume ovulatory cycles sooner after calving than if they are not exposed to bulls.
Animal Reproduction Science 12/2005; 90(3-4):201-9. · 1.75 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of bull excretory products on the resumption of postpartum luteal function in primiparous, restricted-suckled cows. Hypotheses tested were that resumption of luteal function or proportions of cows that initiate luteal cycling did not differ among cows exposed to a bull (BE), exposed to excretory products of bulls (EPB), not exposed to a bull (NE), or exposed to excretory products of cows (EPC). Two-year-old Angus x Hereford cows were assigned 35 d after calving to one of the four treatments (n = 15, 16, 16, and 15 for BE, EPB, NE, and EPC, respectively). Cows in the EPB and EPC treatments were placed in enclosures for 10 to 12 h, between 1830 and 0800 daily. Each enclosure was occupied by bulls (EPB) or left empty (EPC) for 10 to 12 h (0800 to 1830) daily. All cows were restricted to suckling twice daily (0800 and 1800) beginning on d 0. Blood samples were obtained from each cow on d -1 and every third day of the study thereafter. An increase in progesterone concentrations in three consecutive samples that exceeded 1.0 ng/mL was used as evidence of resumption of luteal function. Interval from d 0 to resumption of luteal activity was less for (P < 0.05) BE and EPB cows than for NE cows, but did not differ between BE and EPB cows. Interval for EPC cows did not differ from that for NE cows; however, interval for EPC cows was greater (P = 0.06) than that for BE cows and was longer (P < 0.05) than that of EPB cows. Proportions of cows that resumed luteal function by d 40 and 50 did not differ between NE and EPC cows; however, proportions of EPB and BE cows that resumed luteal function were greater (P < 0.05) than those for NE and EPC cows by d 40 and 50. Proportions of cows that resumed luteal function by d 70 were greater (P < 0.05) for BE, EPB, and EPC cows than for NE cows; however, proportions of BE and EPC cows did not differ. The proportion of EPB cows that resumed luteal function was greater (P = 0.058) than that of EPC cows, but the proportion of BE cows that resumed luteal function did not differ from that of EPC cows by d 70. We conclude that exposing primiparous restricted-suckled cows to excretory products of bulls or crowding estrus-cycling cows in an enclosure hastened postpartum resumption of luteal function. Therefore, the biostimulatory role of bulls and the crowding effect of cows seem to be mediated by a pheromone (or pheremones) present in their excretory products.
Journal of Animal Science 12/2005; 83(11):2495-500. · 2.10 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate postpartum resumption of ovulatory cycles among primiparous, suckled beef cows that were exposed continuously to mature bulls beginning at various intervals after calving. We sought to determine whether cumulative distributions of proportions of cows resuming ovarian cycles and interval from the start of bull exposure to resumption of ovarian cycling activity differed among cows exposed continuously (BE) or not exposed (NE) to bulls beginning on d 15, 35, or 55 after calving. Angus x Hereford cows (n = 56) were assigned randomly to one of six treatments in a 2 (exposure type) x 3 (day exposed postpartum) factorial arrangement. Blood samples were collected from each cow starting on d -1, and every third day until the end of experiment. An increase in baseline progesterone concentrations that exceeded 1.0 ng/mL in three consecutive samples was used as evidence of resumption of ovarian cycling activity. More (P < 0.05) BE cows resumed cycling activity by the end of the experiment than NE cows. Proportions of cows resuming cycling activity did not differ (P = 0.30) among cows exposed to bulls on d 15, 35, or 55 postpartum. Proportions of BE cows that were exposed to bulls on d 15, 35, or 55 were greater for each 10-d interval (P < 0.05) than those for NE cows during the first 40 d after exposure. More (P < 0.05) BE cows exposed to bulls on d 55 resumed cycling activity by 30 d after exposure than BE cows exposed to bulls on either d 15 or 35. Interval from calving to resumption of cycling activity was decreased (P < 0.05) by the presence of bulls. Day of exposure did not affect (P = 0.21) interval from calving to resumption of cycling activity; however, interval from day of bull exposure to resumption of cycling activity decreased (P < 0.05) linearly as day of exposure to bulls after calving increased. We conclude that exposing primiparous beef cows to bulls decreased the postpartum anovulatory interval and increased the proportion of cows that exhibit resumption of ovarian cycling activity, independent of day of bull exposure. Furthermore, cows exposed to bulls at progressively later intervals postpartum seemed to respond more rapidly to the biostimulatory effect of bulls than when they were exposed earlier in the postpartum anestrous period.
Journal of Animal Science 09/2005; 83(9):2106-10. · 2.10 Impact Factor
