C Papakostidis

Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Ιωαννίνων Γ. Χατζηκώστα, Ioánnina, Ipeiros, Greece

Are you C Papakostidis?

Claim your profile

Publications (7)17.07 Total impact

  • Article: The timing of drug administration for thromboprophylaxis following orthopaedic surgery: evidence and controversies related to treatment initiation and duration.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery of the lower extremities or spine are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although consensus exists as to the need for routine thromboprophylaxis in high risk patients, some aspects of this approach, such as the timing of the first dose and overall duration of the anticoagulation regimen, are subject to debate. Reviewing the available literature, there appears to be little evidence to support initiation of thromboprophylaxis more than 12 hours before surgery. Perioperative thromboprophylaxis (2 hours pre to 6 hours post -op) has been associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications whilst initiating prophylaxis more than 12 hours after surgery appears to increase the incidence of subsequent thromboembolic complications. Overall evidence would appear to support initiation of thromboprophylaxis 6 to 9 hours postoperatively, though further confirmatory studies investigating this variable in isolation would be useful to guide clinical decision making. Although evidence exists supporting extended duration thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic procedures, further evidence is required, using clinically important end points, prior to adoption of such an approach in all patients. Stratification of prophylaxis duration, based on risk factors for thromboembolic or bleeding complications, would seem a more rational approach than strict adherence to guidelines.
    Current Vascular Pharmacology 11/2010; 9(1):11-8. · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Article: Pelvic ring disruptions: treatment modalities and analysis of outcomes.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A systematic review of the English literature over the last 30 years was conducted in order to investigate the correlation of the clinical outcome of different types of pelvic ring injuries to the method of treatment. Three basic therapeutic approaches were analysed: non-operative treatment (group A), stabilisation of anterior pelvis (group B) and internal fixation of posterior pelvis (group C). Of 818 retrieved reports, 27 case series, with 28 groups of patients and 1,641 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The quality of the literature was evaluated using a structured questionnaire. Outcomes of the eligible studies were summarised by the medians of the reported results. Most of the component studies were of fair or poor quality. Certain radiological results (quality of reduction, malunion rates) were significantly better in group C. From the functional point of view only walking capacity was proved to be significantly better in the groups of operative treatment compared to the non-operative group.
    International Orthopaedics 06/2008; 33(2):329-38. · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • Article: Prevalence and current concepts of management of farmyard injuries.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Farmyard injuries in young adults and the elderly usually result from machinery accidents, whereas children tend to be injured by runovers and motor vehicle collisions. A variety of farmyard injuries secondary to environmental and human factors may cause permanent disability or even death. Common injuries include lacerations, hand injuries, amputations, farm animal bites, fractures and dislocations. Special considerations should be taken into account when treating these injuries, focusing on their noteworthy bacterial load in order to minimise the risk of chronic morbidity.
    Injury 01/2008; 38 Suppl 5:S27-34. · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • Article: A review of the management of open fractures of the tibia and femur.
    P V Giannoudis, C Papakostidis, C Roberts
    Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume 04/2006; 88(3):281-9. · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • Article: The role and efficacy of retrograding nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the literature.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this analysis has been to evaluate the efficacy of retrograde nailing in the treatment of distal femur and femoral shaft fractures. Articles were extracted from the Pubmed database and the retrieved reports were included in the study only if pre-specified eligibility criteria were fulfilled. Moreover, a constructed questionnaire was administered, aimed at assessing the quality of the outcomes. Twenty-four articles were eligible for the final analysis, reviewing a total of 914 patients (mean age of 48.8 years) who sustained 963 distal and diaphyseal femoral fractures. The overall mortality rate was 5.3%. The incidence of infection was 1.1% and for septic arthritis of the knee was 0.18%. In patients with distal femoral fractures, the mean time to union and rate to union were 3.4 months and 96.9%, respectively. The mean range of knee motion was 104.6 degrees . The rates of knee pain, malunion and re-operations were 16.5, 5.2 and 17%, respectively. Patients with femoral shaft fractures had a mean time to union 3.2 months, whilst the rate of union was 94.2%. The mean range of knee motion was 127.6 degrees . The rates of knee pain, malunion and re-operations were 24.5, 7.4 and 17.7%, respectively. We concluded that retrograde intramedullary nailing appears to be a reliable treatment option, mainly for distal femoral fractures. However, in the management of diaphyseal fractures, retrograde intramedullary nailing is associated with high rates of knee pain and lower rates of fracture union.
    Injury 08/2005; 36(7):813-22. · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • Article: Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the past 40 years, the management of displaced fractures of the acetabulum has changed from conservative to operative. We have undertaken a meta-analysis to evaluate the classification, the incidence of complications and the functional outcome of patients who had undergone operative treatment of such injuries. We analysed a total of 3670 fractures. The most common long-term complication was osteoarthritis which occurred in approximately 20% of the patients. Other late complications, including heterotopic ossification and avascular necrosis of the femoral head, were present in less than 10%. However, only 8% of patients who were treated surgically needed a further operation, usually a hip arthroplasty, and between 75% and 80% of patients gained an excellent or good result at a mean of five years after injury. Factors influencing the functional outcome included the type of fracture and/or dislocation, damage to the femoral head, associated injuries and co-morbidity which can be considered to be non-controllable, and the timing of the operation, the surgical approach, the quality of reduction and local complications which are all controllable. The treatment of these injuries is challenging. Tertiary referrals need to be undertaken as early as possible, since the timing of surgery is of the utmost importance. It is important, at operation, to obtain the most accurate reduction of the fracture which is possible, with a minimal surgical approach, as both are related to improved outcome.
    Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume 02/2005; 87(1):2-9. · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • Article: Mortality after reamed intramedullary nailing of bilateral femur fractures.
    C Papakostidis, M Grotz, P V Giannoudis
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 11/2004; · 2.53 Impact Factor