Mary Teeling

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, L, Ireland (Republic of Ireland)

Are you Mary Teeling?

Claim your profile

Publications (8)19.29 Total impact

  • Article: The prevalence and ingredient cost of chronic comorbidity in the Irish elderly population with medication treated type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cross-sectional study using a national pharmacy claims database.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Comorbidity in patients with diabetes is associated with poorer health and increased cost. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and ingredient cost of comorbidity in patients >=65 years with and without medication treated type 2 diabetes using a national pharmacy claims database. METHODS: The Irish Health Service Executive Primary Care Reimbursement Service pharmacy claims database, which includes all prescribing to individuals covered by the General Medical Services scheme, was used to identify the study population (>=65 years). Patients with medication treated type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were identified using the prescription of oral anti-hyperglycaemic agents alone or in combination with insulin as a proxy for disease diagnosis. The prevalence and ingredient prescribing cost of treated chronic comorbidity in the study population with and without medication treated T2DM were ascertained using a modified version of the RxRiskV index, a prescription based comorbidity index. The association between T2DM and comorbid conditions was assessed using logistic regression adjusting for age and sex. Bootstrapping was used to ascertain the mean annual ingredient cost of treated comorbidity. Statistical significance at p < 0.05 was assumed. RESULTS: In 2010, 43165 of 445180 GMS eligible individuals (9.7%) were identified as having received medication for T2DM. The median number of comorbid conditions was significantly higher in those with T2DM compared to without (median 5 vs. 3 respectively; p < 0.001). Individuals with T2DM were more likely to have >=5 comorbidities when compared to those without (OR = 2.82, 95% CI = 2.76-2.88, p < 0.0001). The mean annual ingredient cost for comorbidity was higher in the study population with T2DM ([euro sign]1238.67, 95% CI = [euro sign]1238.20 - [euro sign]1239.14) compared to those without the condition ([euro sign]799.28, 95% CI = [euro sign]799.14 - [euro sign] 799.41). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with T2DM were more likely to have a higher number of treated comorbid conditions than those without and this was associated with higher ingredient costs. This has important policy and economic consequences for the planning and provision of future health services in Ireland, given the expected increase in T2DM and other chronic conditions.
    BMC Health Services Research 01/2013; 13(1):23. · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • Article: Potentially inappropriate prescribing and cost outcomes for older people: a national population study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Optimization of drug prescribing in older populations is a priority due to the significant clinical and economic costs of drug-related illness. This study aimed to: (i) estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in a national Irish older population using European specific explicit prescribing criteria; (ii) investigate the association between PIP, number of drug classes, gender and age and; (iii) establish the total cost of PIP. This was a retrospective national population study (n= 338 801) using the Health Service Executive Primary Care Reimbursement Service (HSE-PCRS) pharmacy claims database. The HSE-PCRS uses the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system and details of every drug dispensed and claimants' demographic data are available. Thirty PIP indicators (STOPP) were applied to prescription claims for those >or=70 years in Ireland in 2007. STOPP is a physiological system based screening tool of older persons' potentially inappropriate prescriptions assessing drug-drug and drug-disease interactions, dose and duration. In our study population PIP prevalence was 36% (121 454 claimants). The main contributors to this were: 56 560 (17%) prescribed proton pump inhibitors at maximum therapeutic dose for >8 weeks, 29 691 (9%) prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatories for >3 months, 17 676 (5%) prescribed long-acting benzodiazepines for >1 month and 16 201 (5%) prescribed duplicate drugs. The main determinant of PIP was polypharmacy. The likelihood of PIP increased with a significant linear and quadratic trend (P < 0.0001) with the number of drug classes.The maximum net ingredient cost of PIP was estimated to be euro38 664 640. Total PIP expenditure was estimated to be euro45 631 319, 9% of the overall expenditure on pharmaceuticals in those >or=70 years in 2007. The findings identify a high prevalence of PIP in Ireland with significant cost consequences.
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 05/2010; 69(5):543-52. · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • Article: What therapies have replaced rofecoxib in Ireland?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine prescription patterns of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or analgesics in patients prescribed chronic rofecoxib treatment prior to withdrawal from the Irish market, and to determine the impact on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) co-prescription. Using a national prescribing database, adults (> or =16 years) prescribed rofecoxib for > or =3 months, but not analgesics, from January to September 2004 were identified. A longitudinal prescribing history was used to determine switching patterns to other cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, NSAIDs or analgesics during 3 and 12 months after withdrawal. Concomitant PPI prescription was examined. Logistic regression was used to determine the likelihood of switching to a COX-2 inhibitor vs. nonselective NSAID and factors influencing concomitant PPI prescription. After rofecoxib withdrawal, 30.2% (1558) and 17.9% (922) of the 5155 study subjects received no further NSAID prescription during 3 and 12 months, respectively. During the 12-month period, approximately one-third of NSAID prescriptions were for <3 months; 40.7% (2096) received sequential prescriptions for different NSAIDs. Co-prescription of analgesics occurred in 49.3% (2539) of subjects. Neither age nor gender influenced the type of NSAID prescribed in the 12 months post rofecoxib withdrawal. PPI prescription increased by 5.5% during the study, associated with use of nonselective NSAIDs, prior use of PPIs and increasing age. The majority of those receiving chronic rofecoxib therapy were prescribed either no further NSAID or short-term NSAID therapy only during the 12 months post withdrawal, which suggests the subsequent controversy may have encouraged prescribers to adhere more closely to published guidelines.
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 10/2007; 64(4):536-41. · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • Article: Characterizing new users of NSAIDs before and after rofecoxib withdrawal.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To characterize patients initiated on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), pre and postrofecoxib withdrawal, by age, gender and concomitant cardiovascular (CV) therapy. A national primary care prescription database was used to identify patients who initiated NSAID therapy pre and postrofecoxib withdrawal. Patients receiving CV therapy were identified in the same periods also. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Female patients [OR = 1.15 (1.11, 1.19)], those over 65 years [OR = 2.76 (2.65, 2.86)] and those at CV risk [OR = 1.72 (1.67, 1.79)] were more likely to start on celecoxib (over a nonselective NSAID) than male patients, those under 65 years and those not at CV risk. Similar results were found for rofecoxib and nimesulide. Post-withdrawal analysis showed results comparable to the pre-withdrawal period. The results highlight a possible uncertainty experienced by prescribers of treatment alternatives available and a lack of unbiased information at this time for at-risk groups.
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 05/2007; 63(4):494-7. · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Overprescribing antidepressants to children: pharmacoepidemiological study in primary care.
    Kathleen Bennett, Mary Teeling, John Feely
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 01/2006; 331(7530):1451-2.
  • Article: Usage of paracetamol-containing combination analgesics remains high in primary care.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Paracetamol-containing combination analgesics are widely prescribed but the use of paracetamol/dextropropoxyphene (co-proxamol) is particularly controversial. We aim to examine the prescribing patterns of the paracetamol-containing analgesics in Ireland. A national primary care prescribing database was used to investigate patterns of usage. Twenty-six thousand three hundred and eighteen patients who were new to therapy with paracetamol and paracetamol-containing analgesics between January and June 2002 were identified as follows: no previous analgesic medication in the 6 months prior to enrolment into the study, and followed up for at least 12 months from the time of enrolment. Duration of therapy and the number of prescriptions received post enrolment were analyzed according to age. Odds ratios for receiving long-term (>1 month) compared with short-term (1 month) prescriptions for co-proxamol, paracetamol only or a paracetamol combination-type analgesic were calculated for women vs. men, and in those aged over 65 vs. those aged under 65 years. Co-proxamol was the most commonly prescribed analgesic, accounting for 42% of all prescriptions dispensed during 2003. Long-term use of paracetamol-containing analgesic preparations was uncommon, with 56.7% receiving only 1 month's prescription during the study period. However, women (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.07, 1.28, P < 0.0001) and those over 65 years (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.57, 1.86, P < 0.0001) were more likely to receive a follow-up prescription for co-proxamol, but also for paracetamol (women, OR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.16, 1.39; over 65 year olds, OR = 2.67, 95% CI 2.44, 2.93) and the paracetamol combinations (women, OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.20, 1.47; over 65 year olds, OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.53, 1.87). Co-proxamol was the most commonly prescribed paracetamol-containing analgesic preparation in Ireland. The results may indicate inappropriate use in primary care.
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 12/2005; 60(6):648-52. · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • Article: Have COX-2 inhibitors influenced the co-prescription of anti-ulcer drugs with NSAIDs?
    Mary Teeling, Kathleen Bennett, John Feely
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To quantify usage of COX-2 inhibitors compared with nonselective NSAIDs and to determine their impact (including financial) on the co-prescription of antipeptic ulcer (anti-PU) drugs. The Irish General Medical Services prescription database (covering 1.2 million people) was examined for NSAID prescriptions during December 1999-November 2001. NSAID users were excluded during the first 6 months. During the next 12 months (study period) patients on NSAIDs (>or= 3 prescriptions) were identified. The study period and final 6 months provided data on co-prescription of anti-PU drugs. Age, gender, number of concomitant prescriptions, co-prescribing of anti-PU drugs and monthly cost were evaluated for 8 NSAIDs (n= 4 non-selective NSAIDs and n= 4 COX-2 inhibitors) and odds ratios (OR) calculated using logistic regression. COX-2 inhibitors were prescribed more frequently in older, female patients and those receiving multiple medications. After adjustment for age, gender and polypharmacy, anti-PU drugs were prescribed more frequently with COX-2 inhibitors (OR = 1.31 (1.23,1.40)). COX-2 inhibitors were up to 10-fold more expensive, median monthly costs (including anti-PU drugs) ranging from Euros 34.61 (COX-2 inhibitors) to Euros 3.26 (nonselective NSAIDs). Since COX-2 inhibitors are associated with increased rates of co-prescription of anti-PU drugs and are more expensive than non-selective NSAIDs, these results suggest that the expected cost-savings with COX-2 inhibitors may not be occurring in practice.
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 04/2004; 57(3):337-43. · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • Article: "Selective" switching from non-selective to selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
    Kathleen Bennett, Mary Teeling, John Feely
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are thought to account for almost 25% of all reported adverse drug reactions, primarily gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors have been shown to preferentially inhibit activity of the COX-2 enzyme, which maintains anti-inflammatory activity but reduces GI toxicity. To determine the degree of switching from non-selective NSAIDs to COX-2 inhibitors and to examine the factors that were associated with switching. The General Medical Services prescription database (1.2 million people) was examined for NSAID prescriptions from December 1999 through November 2001. All those receiving non-selective NSAIDs and those switching to selective COX-2 inhibitors after at least 1 month on a non-selective NSAID were identified (non-switchers and switchers, respectively). Age, sex, dose of non-selective NSAID and co-prescribing of anti-peptic ulcer (anti-PU) drugs were considered between switchers and non-switchers, and odds ratios (OR) calculated using logistic regression. The effect of chronic use (> or =3 months prescription of a non-selective NSAID during the study period) on switching was also evaluated. A total of 81,538 of 480,573 patients (17%) initially prescribed non-selective NSAIDs were switched to COX-2 inhibitors during the study. The elderly (65 years or older) were more likely to be switched to a COX-2 inhibitor [OR=1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.79, 1.84]. Women were also more likely to be switched to COX-2 inhibitor therapy (OR=1.25, 95% CI 1.23, 1.27). Previous but not subsequent prescribing of anti-PU drugs was also associated with switching. Chronic users showed similar switching patterns. Prescribers are more likely to switch older female patients and those with a past history of peptic ulcers from non-selective NSAIDs to COX-2 inhibitors. This suggests that doctors take risk factors into consideration when prescribing NSAIDs. The relatively low rate of switching may suggest that prescribers still have concerns over the place of COX-2 inhibitors and reserve their use to those patients particularly at risk of NSAID-induced GI toxicity.
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 11/2003; 59(8-9):645-9. · 2.85 Impact Factor

Institutions

  • 2010
    • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
      • HRB Centre for Primary Care Research
      Dublin, L, Ireland (Republic of Ireland)
  • 2005–2007
    • St. James's Hospital
      Dublin, L, Ireland (Republic of Ireland)
  • 2003–2007
    • Trinity College Dublin
      • Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics
      Dublin, L, Ireland (Republic of Ireland)