-
Bret B Friday,
S Keith Anderson,
Jan Buckner,
Chunrong Yu,
Caterina Giannini,
Francois Geoffroy,
John Schwerkoske,
Miroslaw Mazurczak,
Howard Gross,
Eduardo Pajon, Kurt Jaeckle,
Evanthia Galanis
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, has shown evidence of single-agent activity in glioblastoma (GBM), and in preclinical studies, we have demonstrated significant synergistic cytotoxicity between HDAC inhibitors and proteasome inhibitors in GBM cell lines. We therefore conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of vorinostat in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with recurrent GBM. Vorinostat was administered at a dose of 400 mg daily for 14 days of a 21-day cycle, and bortezomib was administered at a dose of 1.3 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of the cycle. A total of 37 patients were treated, and treatment was well tolerated: grade 3, 4 nonhematologic toxicity occurred in 30% of patients and consisted mainly of fatigue (14%) and neuropathy (5%); grade 3, 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 37% of patients and consisted of thrombocytopenia (30%), lymphopenia (4%), and neutropenia (4%). The trial was closed at the predetermined interim analysis, with 0 of 34 patients being progression-free at 6 months. One patient achieved a partial response according to the Macdonald criteria. The median time to progression for all patients was 1.5 months (range, 0.5-5.6 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 3.2 months. Patients who had received prior bevacizumab therapy had a shorter time to progression and OS, compared with those who had not. On the basis of the results of this phase II study, further evaluation of the vorinostat-bortezomib combination in GBM patients in this dose and schedule is not recommended.
Neuro-Oncology 11/2011; 14(2):215-21. · 5.72 Impact Factor
-
Jann N Sarkaria,
Eva Galanis,
Wenting Wu,
Allan B Dietz,
Timothy J Kaufmann,
Michael P Gustafson,
Paul D Brown,
Joon H Uhm,
Ravi D Rao,
Laurence Doyle,
Caterina Giannini, Kurt A Jaeckle,
Jan C Buckner
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions within the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway as a critical modulator of cell survival.
The mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus (CCI-779) was combined with chemoradiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients in a dose-escalation phase I trial. The first 12 patients were treated with CCI-779 combined with radiation/temozolomide and adjuvant temozolomide. A second cohort of 13 patients was treated with concurrent CCI-779/radiation/temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide monotherapy.
Concomitant and adjuvant CCI-779 was associated with a high rate (3 of 12 patients) of grade 4/5 infections. By limiting CCI-779 treatment to the radiation/temozolomide phase and using antibiotic prophylaxis, the rate of infections was reduced, although 2 of 13 patients developed exacerbation of pre-existing fungal or viral infections. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 of 13 patients with this modified schedule. Weekly CCI-779 (50 mg/week) combined with radiation/temozolomide is the recommended phase II dose and schedule. The immune profile of patients in the second cohort was assessed before, during, and after CCI-779 therapy. There was robust suppression of helper and cytotoxic T cells, B cells, natural killer, cells and elevation of regulatory T cells during CCI-779/radiation/temozolomide therapy with recovery to baseline levels during adjuvant temozolomide of cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells, and regulatory T cells.
The increased infection rate observed with CCI-779 combined with chemoradiotherapy in GBM was reduced with antibiotic prophylaxis and by limiting the duration of CCI-779 therapy. The combined suppressive effects of CCI-779 and temozolomide therapy on discrete immune compartments likely contributed to the increased infectious risks observed.
Clinical Cancer Research 10/2010; 16(22):5573-80. · 7.74 Impact Factor
-
Marta Santisteban,
Jan C Buckner,
Joel M Reid,
Wenting Wu,
Bernd W Scheithauer,
Matthew M Ames,
Sara J Felten,
Daniel A Nikcevich,
Martin Wiesenfeld, Kurt A Jaeckle,
Evanthia Galanis
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aims of this trial were to assess the safety and efficacy of two different dosing schedules of irinotecan (CPT-11) in recurrent glioma patients, to assess irinotecan pharmacokinetics in patients on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) and steroids, and to correlate with toxicity and response to treatment.
Sixty-four recurrent glioma patients were included in this study. Schedule A patients received irinotecan weekly (125 mg/m(2)/w) for four out of six weeks. Schedule B patients received irinotecan every three weeks at a dose of 300 mg/m(2). A 20% dose reduction was implemented for patients who had received prior nitrosureas. Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity, tumor progression or patient withdrawal.
There was no difference in confirmed responses between the two groups (6.3%). PFS at 6 months was 6.25% (2/32 patients) on schedule A and 18.75% (6/32 patients) on schedule B but median OS (5.1 versus 5.5 months), and survival at one year (19%) was similar for both arms. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities on schedules A/B were: thrombocytopenia (15.6%/21.9%), diarrhea (6.3%/12.5%) and nausea and vomiting (0%/15.7%). One toxic death due to infection in the absence of neutropenia occurred in schedule B. EIAEDs reduced SN-38 and CPT-11 area under the curve and increased CPT-11 clearance. This effect was more prominent in schedule A patients. Steroids did not alter CPT-11 pharmacokinetics in either schedule.
Single agent irinotecan has modest activity in patients with recurrent gliomas, independently of the administration schedule. Irinotecan administration on an every 3 week schedule resulted in longer PFS-6, at the expense of more toxicity. EIAEDs alter CPT-11 pharmacokinetics in this group of patients, and should be taken into consideration when determining optimal dosing.
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 01/2009; 92(2):165-75. · 3.21 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Since anaplastic gliomas (AG) depend on matrix metalloproteinases for tumor cell invasion and angiogenesis, we undertook this phase II study to evaluate the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor marimastat (MT), combined with the alkylator temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with recurrent AG, looking for improved outcomes.
Patients were treated every 28 days with TMZ at 150-200 mg/m2 once daily on days 1-5 and MT at 25 mg twice daily on days 8-28. Results were compared to our database of anaplastic glioma patients treated at recurrence. A subanalysis of the relationship between MT-induced joint-related toxicity and anticonvulsant status was carried out.
Forty-nine patients were enrolled; all were assessable for toxicity, and 46 were included in the efficacy analysis. Joint and muscle complaints occurred in 32 patients (65%); 1 patient was removed from the study due to toxicity. The best protocol response was a complete response in 1 patient and a partial response in 2 patients (3/46=7%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1, 18). Median time to progression was 24 weeks (95% CI=16, 56), and the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 48% at 6 months (95% CI=35%, 65%), which surpassed the protocol objective of 40%. Sub-analysis showed a positive impact of joint-related toxicity due to MT on PFS whether or not patients were taking CYP450 enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants.
Even though this regimen is more efficacious than our comparator of historical controls in recurrent AG, the regimen was roughly equivalent to single-agent TMZ and was associated with additional toxicity. The sub-analysis suggests pharmacokinetic and drug-drug interactions which may positively impact responses to MT.
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 11/2006; 80(1):83-90. · 3.21 Impact Factor
-
Michael D Prados,
Kathleen Lamborn,
W K A Yung, Kurt Jaeckle,
H Ian Robins,
Minesh Mehta,
Howard A Fine,
Patrick Y Wen,
Timothy Cloughesy,
Susan Chang,
M Kelly Nicholas,
David Schiff,
Harry Greenberg,
Larry Junck,
Karen Fink,
Ken Hess,
John Kuhn
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine the response to CPT-11 administered every three weeks to adults with progressive malignant glioma, treated with or without enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug (EIAED) therapy, at the recommended phase 2 dose determined from a previous phase 1 study. Adult patients age 18 or older with a KPS of 60 or higher who had measurable recurrent grade III anaplastic glioma (AG) or grade IV glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were eligible. No more than one prior chemotherapy was allowed, either as adjuvant therapy or for recurrent disease. The CPT-11 dose was 350 mg/m(2) i.v. every three weeks in patients not on EIAED and 750 mg/m(2) in patients on EIAED therapy. Patients with stable or responding disease could be treated until tumor progression or a total of 12 months of therapy. The primary end point of the study was to determine whether CPT-11 could significantly delay tumor progression, using the rate of six-month progression-free survival (PFS-6). The trial was sized to be able to discriminate between a 15% and 35% rate for the GBM group alone and between a 20% and 40% rate for the entire cohort. There were 51 eligible patients, including 38 GBM and 13 AG patients, enrolled. The median age was 52 and 42 years, respectively. PFS-6 for the entire cohort was 17.6%. PFS-6 was 15.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.31) for the GBM patients and 23% (95% CI, 0.07-0.52) for AG patients. Toxicity for the group included diarrhea and myelosuppression. We conclude that the recommended phase 2 dose of CPT-11 for patients with or without EIAED was ineffective on this schedule, in this patient population.
Neuro-Oncology 05/2006; 8(2):189-93. · 5.72 Impact Factor
-
Michael D Prados,
S Clifford Schold SC JR,
Howard A Fine, Kurt Jaeckle,
Fred Hochberg,
Laszlo Mechtler,
Michael R Fetell,
Surasak Phuphanich,
Lynn Feun,
Todd J Janus,
Kathleen Ford,
William Graney
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: RMP-7, a bradykinin analog, temporarily increases the permeability of the blood-brain tumor barrier to chemotherapy drugs like carboplatin. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of carboplatin and RMP-7 versus carboplatin and placebo in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. The primary outcome measure was time to tumor progression (TTP). Adults with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic glioma were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive carboplatin and either RMP-7 or placebo. Radiation therapy had failed in all patients, and they may have received prior chemotherapy. Carboplatin (dosed to achieve an area under the curve of 5 mg/ml x time for patients who had received prior chemotherapy, or 7 mg/ml x time for those who had not) was given intravenously every 4 weeks, followed by intravenous infusion of either RMP-7 or placebo (300 ng/kg). TTP, tumor response, neuropsychological assessments, functional independence, and quality of life assessments were analyzed every 4 weeks. There were 122 patients enrolled, 62 in the RMP-7 and carboplatin group and 60 in the placebo and carboplatin group. Median TTP was 9.7 weeks (95% CI, 8.3-12.6 weeks) for the RMP-7 and carboplatin group and 8.0 weeks (95% CI, 7.4-12.6 weeks) for the placebo and carboplatin group. Median survival times were 26.9 weeks (95% CI, 21.3-37.6 weeks) for the RMP-7 group and 19.9 weeks (95% CI, 15.0-31.3 weeks) for the placebo group. No differences were noted for time to worsening of neuropsychological assessments, functional independence, or quality of life assessments. The use of RMP-7 had no effect on the pharmacokinetics or toxicity of carboplatin. At the dose and schedule used in this trial, RMP-7 did not improve the efficacy of carboplatin. Recent preclinical pharmacokinetic modeling of RMP-7 suggests that higher doses of RMP-7 may be required to increase carboplatin delivery to tumor.
Neuro-Oncology 05/2003; 5(2):96-103. · 5.72 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) involves the spread of malignant cells from solid tumors to the cerebrospinal fluid or to the leptomeninges. LMD has a very poor prognosis and it is difficult to diagnose and follow with traditional diagnostic tools. The purposes of this study were to characterize cognitive functioning of LMD patients before treatment and to determine if measurement of cognitive functioning could be used to predict survival time.
Thirty-seven subjects with LMD were administered the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) before they received treatment and statistical analyses were performed.
The Conceptualization subtest of the DRS was the most sensitive to disease course. It was the only individual subtest to predict survival and it was the most impaired subtest across individual subjects. These results support earlier findings of a frontal-subcortical pattern of dysfunction in LMD patients. Cognitive performance at time of LMD diagnosis predicts survival time. Age and clinical status, two factors often correlated with survival in the cancer literature, did not predict survival time for our LMD population. In addition, there were no correlations between survival time and previous medical history or demographic factors.
Neuropsychological assessment appears to be a valuable tool both for tracking disease course over time and for predicting survival of patients.
Cancer 10/2002; 95(6):1311-6. · 4.77 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this phase I/II trial was to determine the maximal tolerated dose of CI-980, and determine efficacy against malignant glioma.
The CI-980 is a synthetic mitosis inhibitor that acts via the colchicine binding site on tubulin. Broad in vitro activity has been seen in a variety of human and murine tumor models. Phase I studies have demonstrated schedule dependent toxicity of CI-980. Dose-limiting toxicity was neurologic when CI-980 was given as a 24-hr infusion and hematologic when given over 72 hr at higher doses.
Twenty-four patients ages 29-65 entered this study. Six patients were treated on the phase I arm at three escalating dose levels ranging from 10.5 to 13.5 mg/m2, given over 72 hr. Eighteen patients were then treated at the highest tolerated dose, 13.5 mg/m2 per cycle. Treatment response was based on serial MRI imaging characteristics.
The phase II study was stopped at the end of the first stage due to poor treatment response. There were no partial or complete responses, (0/24) 95% CI = 0-14%. Four patients (4/24) had a best treatment response of stable disease/no change. Median time to progression for all patients was 6.4 weeks (95% CI: 6-9 weeks). Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3-4 granulocytopenia. Three episodes of neurotoxicity manifested by a moderate cerebellar dysfunction were seen.
These results fail to demonstrate the significant activity of CI-980 against recurrent glioma.
Cancer Investigation 02/2002; 20(7-8):948-54. · 1.85 Impact Factor
