-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The pectoralis major (PM) flap is a frequently used flap for head and neck reconstructions. The muscle is easy to transpose on the dominant thoracoacromial bundle and has relative low morbidity. Some patients complain of pain and restricted neck motion after PM flap transposition. Secondary contraction due to radiotherapy, atrophy or insufficient denervation during transposition can be causes for this function deficit. In a series of ten patients we analysed the causes of this contraction and show the results of secondary myectomy of the PM pedicle with transection of the thoracoacromial bundle.
Between 2000 and 2008 a total of 12 myectomies were performed in ten patients. Indication, radiation, denervation of the PM, and follow-up before and after myectomy were analysed retrospectively.
Indications for PM flap reconstruction were floor of mouth malignancy, covering of neck wound, (osteo)radionecrosis, and larynx fistula. In six cases the PM muscle was denervated primarily. Seven patients received preoperative radiation on the wound bed. The interval between PM flap reconstruction and myectomy ranged from five months to seven years. There was no (partial) necrosis of the PM flaps after myectomy (median follow-up 15 months). All patients were satisfied with the result of myectomy.
Myectomy of the PM pedicle with transection of the thoracoacromial bundle after muscle transposition is an effective method to treat secondary neck contracture. The procedure is safe, regardless of pre- or postoperative radiotherapy. Our results question the general accepted theory that muscle flaps remain dependent on their dominant pedicle.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 03/2011; 64(3):323-8. · 1.49 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Free flap breast reconstruction (BR) is generally believed to be more expensive than implant BR, but costs were previously shown to level out over time due to complications and re-operations. The aim of this study was to assess the economic implications of four BR techniques: silicone prosthesis (SP), implant preceded by tissue expansion (TE/SP), latissimus dorsi transposition with or without implant (LD ± SP) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap.
A prospective historic cohort study was performed to evaluate intramural medical costs in 427 patients, who had undergone BR between 2002 and 2009. Short- and medium-term complications were incorporated. In addition, 58 patients, who had recently undergone BR, participated in a questionnaire study to prospectively evaluate extramural medical and non-medical costs. Estimates of mean short- and medium-term costs are presented per patient.
Intramural medical costs for BR and short-term complications for unilateral DIEP flaps (€ 12,848) and TE/SP reconstructions (€ 12,400) were significantly higher than those for LD ± SP reconstructions (€ 5804), which, in turn, were more expensive than SP reconstructions (€ 4731). In bilateral cases, costs of TE/SP (€ 12,723) and LD ± SP (€ 10,760) reconstructions were comparable, while DIEP flaps (€ 15,747) were significantly more expensive and SP reconstructions were significantly cheaper (€ 6784). Overall, the medium-term costs for complications and additional operations were not significantly different (€ 3017-€ 4503). Extramural medical costs and non-medical costs were approximately € 9300 per stage, regardless of technique.
Differences in short-term costs between techniques did not level out during follow-up and SP reconstructions remained least expensive. Single-stage SP reconstructions, however, are not suitable for all patients due to high complication rates. Definite implant placement is therefore increasingly preceded by tissue expansion at more comparable costs to autologous BR. Incorporation of non-medical costs into the cost analysis would render two-stage procedures more costly than autologous BR. To achieve the optimal result, careful patient selection is critical. Only in select cases where two options are equally applicable, cost comparison becomes a valid argument for treatment selection.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 02/2011; 64(8):1043-53. · 1.49 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: --Skin cancer of the face is the most prevalent type of cancer. The large increase of the incidence of this type of cancer in recent years has resulted in an increase of skin cancer resections in the face. --Nasal defects are the most challenging of these facial defects. Nasal reconstruction requires reconstruction of three tissue layers: the inner mucosal lining, supporting structures (cartilage or bone) and the outer cutaneous lining. --The new inner lining should consist of well-vascularized thin tissue to prevent rejection of cartilage or bone in the supporting layer. For example, septal mucosa or skin can be used in various ways to reconstruct the inner lining. --The new supporting structures, consisting of transplanted cartilage or bone, should be strong enough to prevent contraction of the soft tissues--inner and outer lining--during wound healing. --The outer lining is reconstructed per subunit of the nose, e.g. nostril, ala nasi or ridge of the nose. Usually a paramedian forehead flap is used for the reconstruction of the outer lining.
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde 08/2008; 152(30):1657-64.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The goal of nasal reconstruction after a partial or total amputation is to achieve a nasal appearance as natural and normal as possible. It is assumed that laypersons' opinion on facial appearance could affect patient satisfaction or self-concept. The aim of this study was to assess laypersons' opinions on aesthetic outcome of nasal reconstruction. This was compared with the opinion of a professional panel. Second, the effect of informing laypersons about the previous nasal reconstruction of patients on their assessment of facial attractiveness and abnormality was studied. Third, the effects of individual facial features on the assessment of facial attractiveness and abnormality were determined.
A total of 39 consecutive patients treated between November 2001 and May 2005 for (sub) total nasal defects were included, together with a control group of 39 persons without a facial deformity. A group of 20 randomly selected laypersons (10 men and 10 women) assessed facial appearance and abnormality of all 78 persons using standardised colour slides, not knowing who was a patient and who control. Two weeks later they were informed about the true study design and the same questions were asked. In addition, they assessed final treatment results of 39 patients.
No differences existed between assessment of aesthetic outcome after nasal reconstruction by laypersons and professionals (54% good to excellent). Patients were perceived significantly less attractive and more abnormal than controls. Prior knowledge had a significant positive effect on mean facial attractiveness and abnormality scores. High positive correlations were found between facial attractiveness and abnormality scores and the frequency of the item 'nothing in particular', meaning if no particular facial feature was judged to be striking, a face was perceived more attractive and less abnormal.
Nasal reconstruction patients were perceived significantly less attractive and more abnormal by laypersons than controls. Since faces without striking features were judged to be more attractive, the goal of nasal reconstruction would not only be to create a nose as normal as possible, but also as inconspicuous as possible.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 07/2008; 61(6):676-80. · 1.49 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps is typically a three-stage procedure, but additional operations may be required to deal with complications or to improve the aesthetic result. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the total number of operations needed after DIEP flap breast reconstruction to achieve a satisfactory end result for the patient.
From December 2002 to October 2006, 99 DIEP flap breast reconstructions obtained an end result in 72 patients. Data were collected in a structured database. Additional operations and complications were evaluated for the entire group. A study-specific questionnaire was used to evaluate patient satisfaction.
The mean number of additional operations was 1.4 per patient. Patients with complications required more operations than patients without complications. Women who chose nipple reconstruction were younger than women who did not and were more likely to have had a primary or secondary than a tertiary reconstruction. The number of additional aesthetic operations was neither related to the occurrence of complications during the initial reconstruction, nor to patient satisfaction. Overall, patients were very satisfied with the end result.
Completion of DIEP flap breast reconstruction involved the initial reconstruction and an average of 1.4 additional operations. Patients were generally very satisfied with the end result.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 04/2008; 62(1):71-6. · 1.49 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In determining patient satisfaction with functional and aesthetic outcome after reconstructive surgery, including nasal reconstruction, standardised assessment instruments are very important. These standardised tools are needed to adequately evaluate and compare outcome results. Since no such instrument existed for nasal reconstruction, a standardised evaluation questionnaire was developed to assess aesthetic and functional outcome after nasal reconstruction. Items of the Nasal Appearance and Function Evaluation Questionnaire (NAFEQ) were derived from both the literature and experiences with patients. The NAFEQ was validated on 30 nasal reconstruction patients and a reference group of 175 people. A factor analysis confirmed the arrangement of the questionnaire in two subscales: functional and aesthetic outcome. High Cronbach's alpha values (>0.70) for both subscales showed that the NAFEQ was an internally consistent instrument. This study demonstrated that the NAFEQ can be used as a standardised questionnaire for detailed evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcome after nasal reconstruction. Its widespread use would enable comparison of results achieved by different techniques, surgeons and centres in a standardised fashion.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 02/2008; 62(5):656-62. · 1.49 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A woman aged 62 and two men aged 52 and 26 all with a cheek defect following resection of a recurrence of a lentigo maligna, a recurrence of a basal-cell carcinoma of the wispy type and a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans respectively, all underwent cheek reconstruction. The rotation flap technique was used in the first two patients. The third patient was treated with a cervicofacial musculocutaneous transposition flap and underwent postoperative radiotherapy due to the high risk of recurrence. All 3 patients made a good recovery. Defects after radical resection of malignant head and neck skin tumours can be treated by several reconstruction techniques depending on the site, size, and shape of the defect. A local transposition flap is the preferred method of reconstruction. It is important to respect the aesthetic units of the face in order to achieve the best aesthetic and functional results.
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde 06/2007; 151(20):1136-41.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Evaluation of objective and subjective functional follow-up results of intraoral radial forearm free flap reconstructions.
A total of 149 patients had received radial forearm free flaps between January 1996 and December 2005. Seventy-two patients completed a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35 (EORTC H&N35) in the follow-up study. Patients were divided according to location of defect (anterior or posterior) or irradiation. Thirty-nine patients with anterior positioned flaps received standardised physical examinations.
Flap survival was 99.3%. Complications were divided in early (<2 weeks; 23%) and late complications (20%). Most common complications were dehiscence or fistula, responding well to conservative treatment. Analysis of questionnaire subscales showed no statistically significant differences between anterior and posterior defects. Irradiation showed significant impairment for the ability to smell and taste. No important donor site impairment was found.
The radial forearm free flap is an adequate method for reconstructions after resection of intraoral malignancies. Subjective functional outcome seemed to be defined by adjuvant radiotherapy, patient coping and, to a lesser extent, flap bulk for anterior defects.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 01/2007; 60(6):588-92. · 1.49 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Myocutaneous (MC) free flaps are useful for many reconstructive indications. Perforator flaps have become standard of care. The anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) donor site is popular. With the ALT flap varying sizes of vastus lateralis (VL) muscle can be harvested as a MC flap. The skin islands of these flaps have a great range of freedom when dissected on their perforator. It was hypothesised that the VL-ALT perforator flap would offer adequate tissue volume combining maximal freedom in planning with minimal donor site morbidity. From November 2001 to February 2003 a free partial VL with ALT perforator flap was used in 11 patients to reconstruct large defects. Indications for adding a muscular component were exposed bone, skull base, (artificial) dura, or osteosynthesis material, open sinuses, and lack of muscular bulk. Flaps were planned as standard ALT flaps, after which three types of dissection were performed: I. true MC flap; II. muscle flap with a skin island on one perforator, which could be rotated up to 180 degrees ; III. chimera skin perforator flap with muscle being harvested on a separate branch from the source vessel or on a side branch of the skin perforator. Mean skin size of the MC-ALT flaps was 131 cm2. Mean muscle part size of the MC-ALT flaps was 268 cm3. Muscular parts were custom designed for all defects. No total or partial flap failures were seen. Colour mismatch was seen in 6 of 8 patients, when skin was used in the facial area in this all white population. Excessive flap bulk was found in 8 of 11 patients at 6 weeks, however, only in 2 of 11 patients after 6 months. Patients were satisfied with the functional result (8 of 11 patients) as well as the cosmetic result of their reconstruction (7 of 11 patients). All less satisfied patients had received their flap for external facial skin reconstruction. Donor site morbidity was minimal. The combined free partial VL with ALT perforator flap proved valuable as a (chimera type) MC flap with maximal freedom of planning to meet specific reconstructive demands and minimal donor site morbidity.
British Journal of Plastic Surgery 01/2006; 58(8):1095-103. · 1.29 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In determining patient satisfaction with functional and aesthetic outcome after reconstructive surgery, including nasal reconstruction, standardised assessment instruments are very important. These standardised tools are needed to adequately evaluate and compare outcome results. Since no such instrument existed for nasal reconstruction, a standardised evaluation questionnaire was developed to assess aesthetic and functional outcome after nasal reconstruction.Items of the Nasal Appearance and Function Evaluation Questionnaire (NAFEQ) were derived from both the literature and experiences with patients. The NAFEQ was validated on 30 nasal reconstruction patients and a reference group of 175 people.A factor analysis confirmed the arrangement of the questionnaire in two subscales: functional and aesthetic outcome. High Cronbach's alpha values (>0.70) for both subscales showed that the NAFEQ was an internally consistent instrument.This study demonstrated that the NAFEQ can be used as a standardised questionnaire for detailed evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcome after nasal reconstruction. Its widespread use would enable comparison of results achieved by different techniques, surgeons and centres in a standardised fashion.
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery.
