-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Helical tomotherapy (HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are both advanced techniques of delivering intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Here, we conduct a study to compare HT and partial-arc VMAT in their ability to spare organs at risk (OARs) when stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is delivered to treat centrally located early stage non-small-cell lung cancer or lung metastases.
12 patients with centrally located lung lesions were randomly chosen. HT, 2 & 8 arc (Smart Arc, Pinnacle v9.0) plans were generated to deliver 70 Gy in 10 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV). Target and OAR dose parameters were compared. Each technique's ability to meet dose constraints was further investigated.
HT and VMAT plans generated essentially equivalent PTV coverage and dose conformality indices, while a trend for improved dose homogeneity by increasing from 2 to 8 arcs was observed with VMAT. Increasing the number of arcs with VMAT also led to some improvement in OAR sparing. After normalizing to OAR dose constraints, HT was found to be superior to 2 or 8-arc VMAT for optimal OAR sparing (meeting all the dose constraints) (p = 0.0004). All dose constraints were met in HT plans. Increasing from 2 to 8 arcs could not help achieve optimal OAR sparing for 4 patients. 2/4 of them had 3 immediately adjacent structures.
HT appears to be superior to VMAT in OAR sparing mainly in cases which require conformal dose avoidance of multiple immediately adjacent OARs. For such cases, increasing the number of arcs in VMAT cannot significantly improve OAR sparing.
PLoS ONE 01/2013; 8(4):e59729. · 4.09 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Purpose Reirradiation of breast cancer locoregional recurrence (LRR) in the setting of prior post-mastectomy radiation poses a significant
clinical challenge due to the high risk for severe toxicity. In an attempt to reduce these toxicities, we have developed pulsed
reduced dose-rate radiotherapy (PRDR), a reirradiation technique in which a series of 0.2Gy pulses separated by 3-min time
intervals is delivered, creating an apparent dose rate of 0.0667Gy/min. Here we describe our early experience with PRDR.
Patients and methods We reirradiated 17 patients with LRR breast cancer to the chest wall, axilla, or supraclavicular region using PRDR. The median
prior radiation dose was 60Gy. We delivered a median PRDR dose of 54Gy (range 40–66Gy) in 1.8–2.0Gy per fraction. Eight
patients received concomitant low dose capecitabine for radiosensitization. The median treatment volume was 2,084cm3 (range 843–7,881cm3). Results At a median follow-up of 18months (range 4–75months) only 2 patients have had tumor failure in the treatment region. Estimated
2-year local control rate is 92%. Treatment was well tolerated with 4 patients experiencing grade 3 acute skin toxicity. Despite
a median cumulative dose of 110Gy (range 80–236Gy), there has been only one grade 3 and one grade 4 late toxicity. Conclusions With a median follow-up of 18months, PRDR appears to be an effective method to reirradiate large volumes of previously irradiated
tissue in selected patients with locoregional chest wall, axilla, and supraclavicular recurrences.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 04/2012; 114(2):307-313. · 4.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate helical tomotherapy dosimetry in postmastectomy patients undergoing treatment for chest wall and positive nodal regions with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in the scar region using strip bolus. Six postmastectomy patients were scanned with a 5-mm-thick strip bolus covering the scar planning target volume (PTV) plus 2-cm margin. For all 6 cases, the chest wall received a total cumulative dose of 49.3-50.4 Gy with daily fraction size of 1.7-2.0 Gy. Total dose to the scar PTV was prescribed to 58.0-60.2 Gy at 2.0-2.5 Gy per fraction. The supraclavicular PTV and mammary nodal PTV received 1.7-1.9 dose per fraction. Two plans (with and without bolus) were generated for all 6 cases. To generate no-bolus plans, strip bolus was contoured and overrode to air density before planning. The setup reproducibility and delivered dose accuracy were evaluated for all 6 cases. Dose-volume histograms were used to evaluate dose-volume coverage of targets and critical structures. We observed reduced air cavities with the strip bolus setup compared with what we normally see with the full bolus. The thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD) in vivo dosimetry confirmed accurate dose delivery beneath the bolus. The verification plans performed on the first day megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) image verified that the daily setup and overall dose delivery was within 2% accuracy compared with the planned dose. The hotspot of the scar PTV in no-bolus plans was 111.4% of the prescribed dose averaged over 6 cases compared with 106.6% with strip bolus. With a strip bolus only covering the postmastectomy scar region, we observed increased dose uniformity to the scar PTV, higher setup reproducibility, and accurate dose delivered beneath the bolus. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a strip bolus over the scar using tomotherapy for SIB dosimetry in postmastectomy treatments.
Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists 02/2012; 37(3):233-9. · 1.26 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Since the discovery of proven genetic mutations which predispose people to breast cancer along with the routine availability of genetic testing for such mutations, a number of issues have surfaced regarding potential methods of breast cancer diagnosis, surveillance, treatment, and risk reduction. Many of these issues pertain to the practice of radiation oncology and can affect decisions on management. This article aims to describe some of the more salient features of individuals at high genetic risk for breast developing cancer along with aspects of their tumor biology, clinical natural history, and how the radiation oncologist may address these challenges.
American journal of clinical oncology 02/2012; · 2.21 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: No selection criteria for helical tomotherapy (HT) based stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to treat early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or solitary lung metastases has been established. In this study, we investigate the dosimetric selection criteria for HT based SABR delivering 70 Gy in 10 fractions to avoid severe toxicity in the treatment of centrally located lesions when adequate target dose coverage is desired.
78 HT-SABR plans for solitary lung lesions were created to prescribe 70 Gy in 10 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV). The PTV was set to have ≥95% PTV receiving 70 Gy in each case. The cases for which dose constraints for ≥1 OAR could not be met without compromising the target dose coverage were compared with cases for which all target and OAR dose constraints were met.
There were 23 central lesions for which OAR dose constraints could not be met without compromising PTV dose coverage. Comparing to cases for which optimal HT-based SABR plans were generated, they were associated with larger tumor size (5.72±1.96 cm vs. 3.74±1.49 cm, p<0.0001), higher lung dose, increased number of immediately adjacent OARs ( 3.45±1.34 vs. 1.66±0.81, p<0.0001), and shorter distance to the closest OARs (GTV: 0.26±0.22 cm vs. 0.88±0.54 cm, p<0.0001; PTV 0.19±0.18 cm vs. 0.48±0.36 cm, p = 0.0001).
Delivery of 70 Gy in 10 fractions with HT to meet all the given OAR and PTV dose constraints are most likely when the following parameters are met: lung lesions ≤3.78 cm (11.98 cc), ≤2 immediately adjacent OARs which are ≥0.45 cm from the gross lesion and ≥0.21 cm from the PTV.
PLoS ONE 01/2012; 7(4):e35809. · 4.09 Impact Factor
-
12/2011; , ISBN: 978-953-307-746-8
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study highlights the use of adaptive planning to accommodate testicular shielding in helical tomotherapy for malignancies of the proximal thigh. Two cases of young men with large soft tissue sarcomas of the proximal thigh are presented. After multidisciplinary evaluation, preoperative radiation therapy was recommended. Both patients were referred for sperm banking and lead shields were used to minimize testicular dose during radiation therapy. To minimize imaging artifacts, kilovoltage CT (kVCT) treatment planning was conducted without shielding. Generous hypothetical contours were generated on each "planning scan" to estimate the location of the lead shield and generate a directionally blocked helical tomotherapy plan. To ensure the accuracy of each plan, megavoltage fan-beam CT (MVCT) scans were obtained at the first treatment and adaptive planning was performed to account for lead shield placement. Two important regions of interest in these cases were femurs and femoral heads. During adaptive planning for the first patient, it was observed that the virtual lead shield contour on kVCT planning images was significantly larger than the actual lead shield used for treatment. However, for the second patient, it was noted that the size of the virtual lead shield contoured on the kVCT image was significantly smaller than the actual shield size. Thus, new adaptive plans based on MVCT images were generated and used for treatment. The planning target volume was underdosed up to 2% and had higher maximum doses without adaptive planning. In conclusion, the treatment of the upper thigh, particularly in young men, presents several clinical challenges, including preservation of gonadal function. In such circumstances, adaptive planning using MVCT can ensure accurate dose delivery even in the presence of high-density testicular shields.
Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists 09/2011; 37(2):157-62. · 1.26 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: For patients with peripheral, early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer, it has been found feasible to deliver 5 or fewer fractions of large doses through stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) without causing severe early or late injury and with impressive tumor control. In this review, we employ radiobiological modeling with the linear quadratic formulation to explore the adequacy of various dose schedules used for tumor control in the lung as supported by clinical evidence, the influence of dose distribution and delivery time on local control, and how to decrease the likelihood of severe toxicity following SBRT. Furthermore, the validity of the linear quadratic formalism in the high dose range of SBRT for lung cancer is explored.
American journal of clinical oncology 08/2011; 34(4):432-41. · 2.21 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: There is an increasing recognition of the importance of genetic and familial cancer syndromes in routine clinical practice. Although most of gastrointestinal cancers are sporadic, a number of important cancer predisposition syndromes are now recognized and well characterized. In this review, we discuss some of the basic principles of clinical cancer genetics and clinically relevant aspects of the more common gastrointestinal cancer syndromes from the perspective of practicing radiation oncologists.
American journal of clinical oncology 06/2011; 34(3):332-6. · 2.21 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Pulsed reduced-dose-rate radiotherapy (PRDR) is a reirradiation technique that reduces the effective dose rate and increases the treatment time, allowing sublethal damage repair during irradiation.
A total of 103 patients with recurrent glioma underwent reirradiation using PRDR (86 considered to have Grade 4 at PRDR). PRDR was delivered using a series of 0.2-Gy pulses at 3-min intervals, creating an apparent dose rate of 0.0667 Gy/min to a median dose of 50 Gy (range, 20-60) delivered in 1.8-2.0-Gy fractions. The mean treatment volume was 403.5±189.4 cm3 according to T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and a 2-cm margin.
For the initial or upgraded Grade 4 cohort (n=86), the median interval from the first irradiation to PRDR was 14 months. Patients undergoing PRDR within 14 months of the first irradiation (n=43) had a median survival of 21 weeks. Those treated ≥14 months after radiotherapy had a median survival of 28 weeks (n=43; p=0.004 and HR=1.82 with a 95% CI ranging from 1.25 to 3.10). These data compared favorably to historical data sets, because only 16% of the patients were treated at first relapse (with 46% treated at the second relapse, 32% at the third or fourth relapse, and 4% at the fourth or fifth relapse). The median survival since diagnosis and retreatment was 6.3 years and 11.4 months for low-grade, 4.1 years and 5.6 months for Grade 3, and 1.6 years and 5.1 months for Grade 4 tumors, respectively, according to the initial histologic findings. Multivariate analysis revealed age at the initial diagnosis, initial low-grade disease, and Karnofsky performance score of ≥80 to be significant predictors of survival after initiation of PRDR.
PRDR allowed for safe retreatment of larger volumes to high doses with palliative benefit.
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 03/2011; 79(3):835-41. · 4.59 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: As a modality for delivering rotational therapy, helical tomotherapy offers dosimetric advantages by combining a continuously rotating gantry with a binary multileaf collimator. Helical tomotherapy, embodied in the TomoTherapy(®) Hi-Art II(®) system, delivers intensity-modulated fan beams in a helical pattern using binary multileaf collimator leaves while the couch is translated through the gantry. Helical tomotherapy offers the possibility of treating a variety of cases--from simple to complex--with improved target conformality and sensitive structure sparing compared with 3D or conventional static field IMRT plans, thereby allowing biologically effective dose escalation. For precise irradiation and possible treatment adaptation, the fully integrated on-board image-guidance system provides online volumetric images of patient anatomy using 3.5-MV x-ray beams and the xenon computed tomography detector. Several review articles were published before the year 2007 but emphasized the technical aspects of helical tomotherapy. In this article, we review very recent papers and focus on the dosimetric and clinical aspects of helical tomotherapy.
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 02/2011; 11(2):309-20. · 2.65 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To investigate the ability of helical tomotherapy (HT) to spare critical organs immediately adjacent to the tumor target in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for centrally located lung lesions.
HT SBRT plans for 10 patients with centrally located lesions or lesions immediately adjacent to a critical structure were generated. A total of 70 Gy in 10 fractions was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV) to satisfy a target volume coverage of ≥95% PTV receiving 70 Gy and an established set of dose constraints for the organs at risk (OARs). Quality assurance (QA) of the HT plans was performed with both ion chamber and film measurements.
The PTV coverage criteria was met with 95% of the PTV receiving 70.68 ± 0.33 Gy for all cases even though the OARs immediately adjacent to the PTV ranged from 0.38 to 0.85 cm away. The mean lung dose (MLD), and V(20) were 7.15 ± 1.44 Gy, and 11.93 ± 3.24 % for the total lung, respectively. The dose parameters of MLD, V(5), V(10), and V(20) for the contralateral lung were significantly lower than those for the ipsilateral lung (p < 0.05). An average dose fall off from the PTV periphery to the edge of the immediately adjacent OAR was 47.6% over an average distance of 4.87 mm. Comparison of calculated and measured doses with the ion chamber showed an average of 1.85% point dose error, whereas an average mean gamma and the area with a gamma larger than 1 of 0.20 and 0.94% were observed, respectively.
HT allows the sparing of critical structures immediately adjacent to the tumor target, thus making SBRT for these centrally located lesions feasible.
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 01/2011; 81(3):856-62. · 4.59 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Both helical tomotherapy (HT) and single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) deliver radiation using rotational beams with multileaf collimators. We report a dual-institution study comparing dosimetric aspects of these two modalities.
Eight patients each were selected from the University of Maryland (UMM) and the University of Wisconsin Cancer Center Riverview (UWR), for a total of 16 cases. Four cancer sites including brain, head and neck (HN), lung, and prostate were selected. Single-arc IMAT plans were generated at UMM using Varian RapidArc (RA), and HT plans were generated at UWR using Hi-Art II TomoTherapy. All 16 cases were planned based on the identical anatomic contours, prescriptions, and planning objectives. All plans were swapped for analysis at the same time after final approval. Dose indices for targets and critical organs were compared based on dose-volume histograms, the beam-on time, monitor units, and estimated leakage dose. After the disclosure of comparison results, replanning was done for both techniques to minimize diversity in optimization focus from different operators.
For the 16 cases compared, the average beam-on time was 1.4 minutes for RA and 4.8 minutes for HT plans. HT provided better target dose homogeneity (7.6% for RA and 4.2% for HT) with a lower maximum dose (110% for RA and 105% for HT). Dose conformation numbers were comparable, with RA being superior to HT (0.67 vs. 0.60). The doses to normal tissues using these two techniques were comparable, with HT showing lower doses for more critical structures. After planning comparison results were exchanged, both techniques demonstrated improvements in dose distributions or treatment delivery times.
Both techniques created highly conformal plans that met or exceeded the planning goals. The delivery time and total monitor units were lower in RA than in HT plans, whereas HT provided higher target dose uniformity.
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 01/2011; 81(1):284-96. · 4.59 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Xoft Axxent x-ray source has been used for treating nonmelanoma skin cancer since the surface applicators became clinically available in 2009. The authors report comprehensive calibration procedures for the electronic brachytherapy (eBx) system with the surface applicators.
The Xoft miniature tube (model S700) generates 50 kVp low-energy x rays. The new surface applicators are available in four sizes of 10, 20, 35, and 50 mm in diameter. The authors' tests include measurements of dose rate, air-gap factor, output stability, depth dose verification, beam flatness and symmetry, and treatment planning with patient specific cutout factors. The TG-61 in-air method was used as a guideline for acquiring nominal dose-rate output at the skin surface. A soft x-ray parallel-plate chamber (PTW T34013) and electrometer was used for the output commissioning. GafChromic EBT films were used for testing the properties of the treatment fields with the skin applicators. Solid water slabs were used to verify the depth dose and cutout factors. Patients with basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma were treated with eBx using a calibrated Xoft system with the low-energy x-ray source and the skin applicators.
The average nominal dose-rate output at the skin surface for the 35 mm applicator is 1.35 Gy/min with +/- 5% variation for 16 sources. The dose-rate output and stability (within +/- 5% variation) were also measured for the remaining three applicators. For the same source, the output variation is within 2%. The effective source-surface distance was calculated based on the air-gap measurements for four applicator sizes. The field flatness and symmetry are well within 5%. Percentage depth dose in water was provided by factory measurements and can be verified using solid water slabs. Treatment duration was calculated based on the nominal dose rate, the prescription fraction size, the depth dose percentage, and the cutout factor. The output factor needs to be measured for each case with varying shapes of cutouts.
Together with TG-61, the authors' methodology provides comprehensive calibration procedures for medical physicists for using the Xoft eBx system and skin applicators for nonmelanoma skin cancer treatments.
Medical Physics 10/2010; 37(10):5509-17. · 2.83 Impact Factor
-
Louis Potters,
Brian Kavanagh,
James M Galvin,
James M Hevezi,
Nora A Janjan,
David A Larson,
Minesh P Mehta,
Samuel Ryu,
Michael Steinberg,
Robert Timmerman, James S Welsh,
Seth A Rosenthal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 02/2010; 76(2):326-32. · 4.59 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Megavoltage CT (MVCT) simulation on the TomoTherapy Hi·Art system is an alternative to conventional CT for treatment planning in the presence of severe metal artifact. StatRT is a new feature that was implemented on the TomoTherapy operator station for performing online MVCT scanning, treatment planning and treatment delivery in one session. The clinical feasibility of using the StatRT technique and MVCT simulation to palliative treatment for a patient with substantial spinal metallic hardware is described. A patient with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer involving the thoracic spine underwent conventional kilovoltage CT simulation. The metal artifact due to stainless steel spine-stabilizing rods was too severe for treatment planning, despite attempts to correct using density override. The patient was then re-scanned using MVCT on a tomotherapy unit. Plans were generated using both StatRT and conventional tomotherapy planning (Tomo plan) with different settings for comparison. StatRT planning ran a total of five iterations in a short planning window (10-15 min). Two Tomo plans were generated using: (1) five iterations in the "full scatter" mode, and (2) 300 iterations in the "beamlet" mode. It was noted that the DVH of the StatRT plan was almost identical to the Tomo plan optimized by the "full scatter" mode and the same number of iterations. Dose distribution analysis reveals that these three planning methods yielded comparable doses to heart, lungs and targets. This work also demonstrated that undermodulation can result in a high degree of thread effects. The overall time for the treatment process (including 7 minutes for simulation, 15 minutes for contouring, 10 minutes for planning and 5 minutes for delivery) decreases from hours to around 40 minutes using the StatRT procedure. StatRT is a feasible treatment-planning tool for physicians to scan, contour and treat patients within one hour. This can be particularly beneficial in urgent palliative treatments.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 01/2010; 12(1):3348. · 1.29 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This work reports our initial experience using multimodality image guidance to improve total marrow irradiation (TMI) using helical tomotherapy. We also monitored the details of the treatment delivery to glean information necessary for the implementation of future adaptive processes. A patient with metastatic Ewing's sarcoma underwent MRI, and bone scan imaging prior to TMI. A whole body kilovoltage CT (kVCT) scan was obtained for intensity modulated TMI treatment planning, including a boost treatment to areas of bony involvement. The delivered dose was estimated by using MVCT images from the helical tomotherapy treatment unit, compared to the expected dose distributions mapped onto the kVCT images. Clinical concerns regarding patient treatment and dosimetric uncertainties were also evaluated. A small fraction of thoracic bone volume received lower radiation dose than the prescribed dose. Reconstructed planned treatment volume (PTV) and the dose delivered to the lung were identical to planned dose. Bone scan imaging had a higher sensitivity for detecting skeletal metastasis compared to MR imaging. However the bone scan lacked sufficient specificity in three dimensions to be useful for planning conformal radiation boost treatments. Inclusion of appropriate imaging modalities improves detection of metastases, which allows the possibility of a radiation dose boost to metastases during TMI. Conformal intensity modulated radiation therapy via helical tomotherapy permitted radiation delivery to metastases in the skull with reduced dose to brain in conjunction with TMI. While TMI reduces irradiation to the lungs, onboard megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) to verify accurate volumetric dose coverage to marrow-containing thoracic bones may be essential for successful conformal TMI treatment.
Technology in cancer research & treatment 03/2009; 8(1):23-8. · 2.02 Impact Factor
-
James S Welsh
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: With the arrival of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy, radiation dose distributions in radiation oncology have improved dramatically over the past couple of decades. As part of a natural progression there recently has been a resurgence of interest in hadron therapy, specifically charged particle therapy, because of the even better dose distributions potentially achievable. In principle, using charged particle beams, radiation dose distributions can be achieved that surpass those possible with even the most sophisticated photon radiation delivery techniques. Certain charged particle beams might possess some biologic advantages in terms of tumor kill potential as well as this dosimetric advantage. The particles under consideration for such clinical applications all belong to the category of particles known as hadrons. This review introduces some of the elementary physics of the various hadron species previously used, currently used or being considered for future use in radiation oncology.
American journal of clinical oncology 11/2008; 31(5):493-5. · 2.21 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Helical tomotherapy is a unique approach to image-guided IMRT that combines features of a linear accelerator and a CT scanner. This design allows generation of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images, which among other uses, are used to verify daily setup. In this study, we assessed the image-quality, absorbed radiation doses, and clinical practicality of MVCT from our helical tomotherapy prototype unit.
Phantom studies were first performed to assess the capabilities of MVCT. Next, MVCT images from human patients prospectively enrolled on institutional review board-approved imaging and treatment protocols were analyzed. MVCT was obtained using a 4-MV beam from the University of Wisconsin helical tomotherapy prototype device. These scans were compared with conventional kilovoltage (kVCT) images from a diagnostic CT scanner.
MVCT images in phantoms demonstrate an ability to detect contrast differences as small as 3%. Small objects, 1.2 to 1.6 mm, were seen with good resolution. In human subjects, MVCT imaging of tumor targets and normal anatomy revealed sufficient detail for patient repositioning. MVCT imaging of metallic objects showed minimal artifact in comparison with kVCT. Patient scans were obtained in about 1 to 5 minutes and resulted in absorbed radiation doses of 1.5 to 3 cGy.
MVCT is an elegant pretreatment position and setup verification tool. MVCT images of human subjects obtained from the helical tomotherapy unit showed good resolution and contrast. The high-quality three-dimensional information permits its use in day-to-day setup verification. The unique properties of MVCT also provide the potential for primary imaging of anatomic regions near metal prostheses as well as nonmedical applications. Additional investigations are underway to improve image quality, further reduce patient dose, and aid adaptive radiotherapy and dose reconstruction.
American journal of clinical oncology 01/2008; 30(6):617-23. · 2.21 Impact Factor
-
James S Welsh
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Radioisotopes that decay via beta emission are widely used in science and medicine, particularly in the field of oncology. PET imaging, which exploits the basic mechanism of beta plus decay or positron emission, is becoming increasingly important in cancer diagnosis, follow-up evaluation, and radiation therapy planning. Beta-emitting radiopharmaceuticals are finding wider applications in cancer treatment, such as radioimmunotherapy and bone-seeking radiopharmaceutical therapy. Beta-emitting radioisotopes have also been extensively used in vascular brachytherapy and other brachytherapy applications. Many radioisotopes that undergo beta decay yield excited daughter nuclei, which produce gamma rays that are useful for both brachytherapy and teletherapy. This review briefly describes some of the history, basic physics, and common applications of representative beta emitters in basic science and clinical oncology.
American journal of clinical oncology 09/2007; 30(4):437-9. · 2.21 Impact Factor
