Laurel W. Rice

University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Are you Laurel W. Rice?

Claim your profile

Publications (85)316.77 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study objective: To determine the complications associated with single incision laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology surgery. Design: Retrospective cohort DESIGN: Classification: II-3 SETTING: Single academic institution PATIENTS: 115 consecutive patients undergoing single-incision laparoscopy with suspected gynecology oncology conditions INTERVENTION: Single-incision laparoscopy MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 115 patients underwent single-incision laparoscopy. Mean age 55.3 ± 13.1 years. For procedures completed via single-incision laparoscopy 102/115 (88.7%), the mean operative time was 130.7 ± 55.5 minutes. The average blood loss was 63 ± 111 milliliters. The conversion to open rate was overall 13/115 (12.17%). Conversion rate of the 55 patients with benign conditions was lower 2/55 (3.64%), compared to the 60 patients with malignant conditions; 11/60 (18.33%). The hernia rate was 2/115 (1.80%), one of which was a recurrent hernia. The median time for follow up was 30 days (range 5-653 days). Conclusion: Single-incision laparoscopy provides a feasible, safe, and promising minimally invasive modality for treating gynecologic oncology patients.
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 11/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.002 · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To examine the treatment and survival of elderly women diagnosed with advanced-stage, high-grade endometrial cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 with advanced-stage, high-grade endometrial cancers (grade 3 adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, clear-cell carcinoma, and uterine serous carcinoma) using the National Cancer Database. Women were stratified by age: younger than 55, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and 85 years old or older. Multivariate logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazards survival methods for all-cause mortality were used for analyses. Results: Twenty thousand four hundred sixty-eight patients were included, 14.9% younger than 55 years, 30.9% 55-64 years, 31.1% 65-74 years, 18.8% 75-84 years, and 4.3% 85 years old or older. Patients younger than 55 years had surgery more frequently compared with patients 75-84 years (97.2% compared with 95.8%; P<.001) and 85 years or older (97.2% compared with 94.8%; P<.001) and a higher rate of lymph node dissection (78.7% compared with 70.5%; P<.001 and 78.7% compared with 59.5%; P<.001, respectively). Women younger than 55 years old were more likely to receive chemotherapy compared with those 75-84 years (63.9% compared with 42.2%; P<.001) and 85 years old or older (63.9% compared with 22%; P<.001). After adjusting for prognostic factors, women ages 75-84 and 85 years or older were less likely to have received chemotherapy compared with women younger than 55 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.38 and OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.10-0.14). The same was true with surgery (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.88 and OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.70) and radiotherapy (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.70 and OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.37-0.56). The Cox regression model showed that in women with stage III disease, women 75-84 years had a twofold higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 2.38, 95% CI 2.14-2.65) and those 85 years or older had a threefold higher risk (HR 3.16, 95% CI 2.76-3.61) compared with patients younger than 55 years. Patients with stage IV and age 75-84 years had a 24% increased risk of death (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.40) and those 85 years or older had a 52% increased risk (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.29-1.79). Conclusion: Elderly women with high-grade endometrial cancer are less likely to be treated with surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation. Level of evidence: II.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 11/2015; DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001140 · 5.18 Impact Factor

  • Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 11/2015; 22(6):S90-S91. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.244 · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • H Barnes · R Spencer · S Uppal · L Rice · A Al-Niaimi ·

    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 11/2015; 22(6):S49-S50. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.136 · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • LB Huffman · RJ Spencer · EE Medlin · S Uppal · LW Rice · AN Al-Niaimi ·

    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 11/2015; 22(6):S98. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.263 · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify the pre-discharge predictors of 30-day readmission and the impact of same day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Patients undergoing only laparoscopic hysterectomy ± bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The 30-day readmission rate was 3.1% (277/8890).Factors predictive of higher rates of readmission were diabetes (4.4%vs 3.0%,p=0.03), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (8.5%vs 3.1%,p=0.02), disseminated cancer (20%vs 3.1%,p<0.001), chronic steroid use (7.1%vs 3.1%,p=0.03), daily alcohol use >2 drinks (12.5%vs 2.5%,p=0.04) and bleeding disorder (10.8%vs 3%,p=0.001). Operative factors included surgical time of greater than equal to 2 hours (3.5% vs. 2.7%,p=0.014). Post surgery, patients had a higher rate of readmission when they experienced any one or more complication prior to discharge, (6.9%vs.3.1%, p=0.01) as well as any complication after discharge (3.6%vs.1.6%, p=0.01). Infections (35.7%) and surgical complications (24.2%) were the most common reasons of readmissions. Of these patients, 20.9% were discharged the same day (n= 1855) and had similar rate of readmission (2.6% vs. 3.2%,p=n.s.). Laparoscopic hysterectomy readmission score (LHRS) can be calculated by assigning 1 point to diabetes, COPD, disseminated cancer, chronic steroid use, bleeding disorder, length of surgery >=2hrs and 2 points to any postoperative complication prior to discharge. Readmission rates for the LHRS score were score 1 (2.4%), score 2 (3.3%), score 3 (5.8%), score 4 (9.5%). Overall readmission rate after laparoscopic hysterectomy is low. Patients discharged the same day have similar rates of readmission. Higher LHRS is indicative of higher rates of readmission and may identify a population not suitable for same day discharge and in need of higher vigilance to prevent readmissions. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 05/2015; 213(3). DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.014 · 4.70 Impact Factor

  • Gynecologic Oncology 04/2015; 137:151. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.377 · 3.77 Impact Factor
  • Marcela G Del Carmen · Laurel W Rice · Kathleen M Schmeler ·
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe challenges faced by low-middle income countries (LMICs) across the cancer spectrum, with specific focus on gynecologic cancers. MEDLINE was searched for research articles published in English between January 1, 2000-February 1, 2015 which reported on global health efforts in LMICs. An estimated 80% of global cancer burden and only 5% of global cancer spending affects LMICs. The overwhelming majority of cervical cancer cases and related deaths occur in LMICs. The charge to close this cancer divide is at the center of global health efforts. Prevention is central to global health efforts to close the cancer divide. The gynecologic oncology community is well positioned to lead efforts in global health by partnering with institutions, professional societies and advocacy groups. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Gynecologic Oncology 03/2015; 137(2). DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.009 · 3.77 Impact Factor
  • Marcela G. del Carmen · Laurel W. Rice ·
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In gynecologic oncology, significant advances with improved patient outcomes have clearly and thankfully resulted from randomized clinical trials. The recent restructuring of cooperative groups and decreased funding for phase III clinical trials have unintentionally resulted in a 90% reduction of available trials and accrual in gynecologic oncology. This Commentary reviews the history of the underrepresentation of women in clinical trials, highlighting the challenges that threaten the viability of gynecologic oncology clinical research, resulting in a decreased likelihood of improving the survival of women with gynecologic cancer. We suggest an opportunity for partnering with the U.S. government and the private sector to enhance research funding opportunities while increasing advocacy efforts to reinvigorate our clinical trials platform.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 03/2015; 125(3):1. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000695 · 5.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The purpose of this study was to quantify the predictive value of frailty index on 30-day Clavien class IV (requiring critical care support) and class V (30-day mortality) complications after gynecologic cancer surgery. Methods: Patients included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2008-2011 had a final diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy. Modified frailty index (mFI) was calculated with 11 variables. Higher mFI scores indicated more severe comorbidities. Logistic regression was used to control for known predictors of complications. Results: Of the total 6551 patients, 188 (2.9%) of the patients experienced a Clavien IV/V complication. 2958 patients had a score of 0 (45.2%), 2405 patients had a score of 1 (36.7%), 985 patients had a score of 2 (15%), 162 patients had a score of 3 (2.5%) and 41 patients had a score≥4 (0.6%). The rates of Clavien IV/V complications were 2%, 2.7%, 4.4%, 7.4% and 24.4% for mFI scores of 0, 1, 2, 3 and ≥4, respectively (p<0.001). Variables found to be significant for predicting Clavien IV and V complications on logistic regression modeling were preoperative albumin<3g/dL (OR=6.5), operative time (OR=1.003 per min increase), non-laparoscopic surgery (OR=3.3), and frailty index (OR score 0=reference, score 1=1.26, score 2=1.9, score 3=2.33 and score≥4=12.5). Taking the two preoperative factors of albumin and mFI allowed for greater precision in identifying women who are at higher risk for requiring ICU care (>10% risk). Conclusions: Modified frailty index (mFI) is predictive of the need for critical care support and 30-day mortality after surgery for gynecologic cancer.
    Gynecologic Oncology 01/2015; 137(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.532 · 3.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate a cohort of gynecologic oncology patients to discover risk factors for early- and late-occurring incisional hernia after midline incision for ovarian cancer. We collected retrospective data from patients undergoing primary laparotomy for ovarian cancer at the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics from 2001 to 2007. Patient characteristics and potential risk factors for hernia formation were noted. Physical examination, abdominal computerized assisted tomography scans, or both were used to detect hernias 1 year after surgery (early hernia) and 2 years after surgery (late hernia). There were 265 patients available for the 1-year analysis and 189 patients for the 2-year analysis. Early and late hernia formation occurred in 9.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2-12%) and an additional 7.9% (95% CI 4.1-12%) of patients, respectively. Using multiple logistic regression, poor nutritional status (albumin less than 3 g/dL) and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery (1 cm or greater residual tumor) were significantly associated with the formation of early incisional hernia after midline incision (P<.001 for both). Late hernia formation was associated only with age 65 years or older (P=.01). The formation of early incisional hernias after midline incision is associated with poor nutritional status and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery, whereas late hernia formation is associated with advanced age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: II.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 01/2015; 125(2). DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000610 · 5.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: SSI rates after gynecologic oncology surgery vary from 5% to 35%, but are up to 45% in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Strict postoperative glucose control by insulin infusion has been shown to lower morbidity, but not specifically SSI rates. Our project studied continuous postoperative insulin infusion for 24h for gynecologic oncology patients with DM and hyperglycemia with a target blood glucose of <139 mL/dL and a primary outcome of the protocol's impact on SSI rates. Methods: We compared SSI rates retrospectively among three groups. Group 1 was composed of patients with DM whose blood glucose was controlled with intermittent subcutaneous insulin injections. Group 2 was composed of patients with DM and postoperative hyperglycemia whose blood glucose was controlled by insulin infusion. Group 3 was composed of patients with neither DM nor hyperglycemia. We controlled for all relevant factors associated with SSI. Results: We studied a total of 372 patients. Patients in Group 2 had an SSI rate of 26/135 (19%), similar to patients in Group 3 whose rate was 19/89 (21%). Both were significantly lower than the SSI rate (43/148, 29%) of patients in Group 1. This reduction of 35% is significant (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed an odd ratio = 0.5 (0.28-0.91) in reducing SSI rates after instituting this protocol. Conclusions: Initiating intensive glycemic control for 24h after gynecologic oncology surgery in patients with DM and postoperative hyperglycemia lowers the SSI rate by 35% (OR = 0.5) compared to patients receiving intermittent sliding scale insulin and to a rate equivalent to non-diabetics.
    Gynecologic Oncology 09/2014; 136(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.09.013 · 3.77 Impact Factor

  • Gynecologic Oncology 06/2014; 133:129. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.338 · 3.77 Impact Factor

  • Gynecologic Oncology 06/2014; 133:25-26. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.083 · 3.77 Impact Factor

  • Gynecologic Oncology 06/2014; 133:167. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.441 · 3.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To quantify the impact of preoperative hypoalbuminemia on 30-day mortality and morbidity after gynecologic cancer surgery METHODS: Patients included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) dataset who underwent any non-emergent surgery for gynecologic malignancy between 1/1/2008 and 12/31/2010 were identified. Analysis was conducted with albumin both as a dichotomous variable (< 3.5g/dl was defined as low albumin) and as a continuous variable to determine a clinically relevant cut-off value. Of the total 3171 patients identified, 2110 had preoperative albumin levels available for analysis. In addition, 279 (13.3%) of these patients had low albumin levels. According to multivariate analysis, the low albumin group had significantly higher odds of developing one or more post-operative complications (OR-2,CI: 1.47-2.73, p<0.0001), three or more complications (OR-4.1,CI: 2.31-7.1, p<0.0001), surgical complications (OR-2.39,CI: 1.59-3.58, p<0.0001), thromboembolic complications (OR-2.59,CI: 1.33-5.06, p<0.0001), pulmonary complications (OR-4.06,CI: 2.05-8.03, p<0.0001), or infectious complications (OR-1.84,CI: 1.26-2.69, p<0.0001) and a higher 30-day mortality (OR-6.52,CI: 2.51-16.95, p<0.0001). Upon subgroup analysis, this difference was not found in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. In patients undergoing open surgery, the probability of experiencing one or more post-operative complications increased linearly with the decrease in albumin level; however, the probability of patients experiencing three or more complications and 30-day mortality increased sharply as soon as the albumin level decreased below 3g/dl. Preoperative albumin levels<3g/dL identify a population of patients at a very high-risk of experiencing perioperative morbidity and 30-day mortality after open surgery.
    Gynecologic Oncology 08/2013; 131(2). DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.08.011 · 3.77 Impact Factor

  • Gynecologic Oncology 07/2013; 130(1):e22. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.114 · 3.77 Impact Factor

  • Gynecologic Oncology 03/2012; 125:S10. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.12.020 · 3.77 Impact Factor
  • M Heather Einstein · Laurel W Rice ·
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is reasonable to perform complete lymphadenectomy in patients at significant risk of lymph node metastases, and use the results to guide adjuvant treatment decisions.(24,25) Criteria for staging based on intraoperative pathology should be determined in consultation with the pathologist, preferably with an institution-specific quality-assurance review.(34) Patients with more aggressive histologies should undergo a staging procedure including an omental biopsy whenever possible, with the understanding that most require systemic adjuvant therapy. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with shorter recovery and fewer postoperative complications than open endometrial cancer staging,(4,5,45) with preliminary data showing similar oncologic outcomes (Walker and colleagues, late breaking abstract SGO 2010 Annual Meeting). Whenever feasible, patients should be offered minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer staging. Retrospective data support an attempt at complete cytoreduction in patients with advanced endometrial cancer and a good performance status.(8-12) The decision to perform aggressive cytoreductive surgery should be individualized, taking into account the patient's comorbidities, her performance status, her symptoms, and the risks associated with more aggressive surgical procedures.
    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America 02/2012; 26(1):79-91. DOI:10.1016/j.hoc.2011.10.005 · 2.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Concerns have been raised about gynecologists as vaccinators. This survey evaluated use of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, attitudes, and barriers among gynecologists and family practitioners for differences between the 2 specialties. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a 50-item, self-administered questionnaire mailed to participants. The study was conducted in Virginia through the University of Virginia Center for Survey Research. The questionnaire was mailed to 500 family practitioners and 500 gynecologists. The questionnaire asked provider and practice demographics, vaccine practices, knowledge, HPV vaccine attitudes, and barriers to vaccination. We compared gynecologists to family practitioners for the outcome of offering HPV vaccination. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with providers choosing to offer and recommend the HPV vaccine. After exclusion of ineligible physicians, 385 of 790 doctors responded (48.7%). Seventy percent of family practitioners and 73.5% of gynecologists currently offer the HPV vaccine. There were no significant differences in demographics or practice patterns between the specialties. The most frequent barrier to vaccination reported by both groups was reimbursement. In multivariate logistic regression, inadequate reimbursement was negatively associated with offering the HPV vaccine (odds ratio [OR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-1.1) and with recommending the vaccine to patients (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.26-0.76). Experience treating HPV- related disease was positively associated with offering the HPV vaccine (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.8). Gynecologists are providing HPV vaccination at rates similar to family practitioners. Reimbursement concerns may negatively have an impact on doctors' recommendation of the HPV vaccine.
    Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology 09/2011; 24(6):380-5. DOI:10.1016/j.jpag.2011.06.016 · 1.68 Impact Factor

Publication Stats

3k Citations
316.77 Total Impact Points


  • 2008-2015
    • University of Wisconsin–Madison
      • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • 1996-2008
    • University of Virginia
      • • Department of Pathology
      • • Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism
      • • Division of Gynecologic Oncology
      • • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • 2007
    • Gynecologic Oncology Group
      Buffalo, New York, United States
  • 1989-1996
    • Harvard Medical School
      • • Department of Pathology
      • • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology
      Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • 1995
    • National Cancer Institute (USA)
      베서스다, Maryland, United States
    • Virginia Mason Medical Center
      Seattle, Washington, United States
  • 1994
    • Tufts University
      Бостон, Georgia, United States
  • 1993
    • Harvard University
      Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • 1991-1992
    • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Department of Pathology
      Boston, Massachusetts, United States