Publications (7)32.31 Total impact
-
Article: Transfusion-related acute lung injury: incidence and risk factors.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) is the leading cause of transfusion-related mortality. To determine TRALI incidence by prospective, active surveillance and to identify risk factors by a case-control study, 2 academic medical centers enrolled 89 cases and 164 transfused controls. Recipient risk factors identified by multivariate analysis were higher IL-8 levels, liver surgery, chronic alcohol abuse, shock, higher peak airway pressure while being mechanically ventilated, current smoking, and positive fluid balance. Transfusion risk factors were receipt of plasma or whole blood from female donors (odds ratio = 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-11.2, P = .001), volume of HLA class II antibody with normalized background ratio more than 27.5 (OR = 1.92/100 mL, 95% CI, 1.08-3.4, P = .03), and volume of anti-human neutrophil antigen positive by granulocyte immunofluoresence test (OR = 1.71/100 mL, 95% CI, 1.18-2.5, P = .004). Little or no risk was associated with older red blood cell units, noncognate or weak cognate class II antibody, or class I antibody. Reduced transfusion of plasma from female donors was concurrent with reduced TRALI incidence: 2.57 (95% CI, 1.72-3.86) in 2006 versus 0.81 (95% CI, 0.44-1.49) in 2009 per 10 000 transfused units (P = .002). The identified risk factors provide potential targets for reducing residual TRALI.Blood 11/2011; 119(7):1757-67. · 9.90 Impact Factor -
Article: Minority and foreign-born representation among US blood donors: demographics and donation frequency for 2006.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Historically, minority populations have represented only a small proportion of US blood donors, but recent trends in immigration and potential blood shortages emphasize the need for recruitment strategies to increase minority donations. Donation data from a network of six US blood centers for 2006 were analyzed. Race/ethnicity, country of birth, and educational attainment data were collected specifically for the study and assessed for their influence on donation behavior. Logistic regression was used to determine independent associations with repeat donors status and annual donation frequency. A total of 1,288,998 donations from 729,068 donors were studied; most donors had data on race/ethnicity (97.1%) and country of birth (93.1%). The proportion of minority donors differed by blood center, with African American donors (16%) most common at the Southeastern blood center and Asian (12%), Hispanic (13%), and foreign-born donors (13%) most common at the Northern California blood center. Minority donors and those born in Mexico or Latin America were younger than white donors. Minority and non-US-born donors were less likely than white and US-born donors to be repeat donors (odds ratio [OR], 0.60-0.78), and most were less likely to give two or more annual donations (OR, 0.82-1.11). Minority and Mexico/Latin America-born donors represent a younger and often first-time donor population compared to white and US-born donors, but their annual donation frequency was only slightly lower than white and US-born donors. Increasing the retention and donation frequency of minorities will be important for supplementing the blood supply.Transfusion 07/2009; 49(10):2221-8. · 3.22 Impact Factor -
Article: Evaluation of a new Trypanosoma cruzi antibody assay for blood donor screening.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This multicenter prospective study was designed to evaluate the performance characteristics of a new commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi in blood donors, the ORTHO T. cruzi ELISA Test System (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics). Assay specificity was evaluated among 40,665 serum and ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) plasma specimens from volunteer blood donors and 481 T. cruzi antibody-negative specimens from a high-risk population. Sensitivity was evaluated among 106 T. cruzi-infected subjects identified by parasite detection, among 93 radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA)-positive specimens from high-risk subjects, and 662 specimens presumed positive for the presence of T. cruzi antibodies by serologic methods. Also assessed were the equivalence of serum and plasma as specimen sources, performance equivalence of automated and semiautomated processing methods, nonspecific reactivity in specimens from other disease states or clinical conditions, and assay precision. Assay specificity was 99.998 percent in volunteer blood donors and 99.4 percent among high-risk subjects. Sensitivity was 100 percent among specimens positive by parasite detection, or by serologic methods, and 98.9 percent among RIPA-positive specimens from high-risk subjects. No differences were demonstrated between serum and plasma or between semiautomated and automated processing methods. Cross-reactivity was observed with known positive leishmaniasis specimens. Total inter- and intraassay variability was less than 10 percent with both the automated and the semiautomated methods. The ORTHO T. cruzi ELISA Test System is an effective, qualitative assay for screening blood donors for immunoglobulin G antibodies to T. cruzi. The assay was licensed for donor screening by the FDA in December 2006.Transfusion 04/2008; 48(3):531-40. · 3.22 Impact Factor -
Article: A randomized trial of blood donor recruitment strategies.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Improvement in donor return rates, especially among first-time donors, may significantly improve the blood supply. There are few rigorous studies of the effectiveness of various approaches to donor recruitment, however. By use of a single-blind, randomized trial design, 6919 post-September 11, 2001, first-time donors were randomly assigned into the following intervention arms: T-shirt incentive versus none, recruitment scripts with a patient story (Script A) versus a complimentary message including the donor's blood type (Script B), and telephone versus e-mail recruitment. Our primary outcome was a second donation within 6 months. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95 percent confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated with Taylor series methods. A total of 1421 (20.5%) first-time donors returned within the 6 months, including 1252 with a second and 169 with both second and third donations. The T-shirt incentive was not effective in increasing returns compared to no incentive (20.5% vs. 20.6%; RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09). Script A was significantly more effective than Script B (22.2% vs. 18.9%; RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.29). E-mail was substantially less effective than telephone recruitment (13.2% vs. 27.8%; RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.57). A T-shirt incentive had no apparent effect, but an empathetic message significantly improved the return donation rate. E-mail recruitment was substantially less effective than telephone recruitment, perhaps due to technical problems. The study illustrates the utility of the randomized clinical trial study design for testing donor recruitment strategies.Transfusion 08/2006; 46(7):1090-6. · 3.22 Impact Factor -
Article: Blood donor and component management strategies to prevent transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI).
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Discuss the pros and cons of using donor and blood product-management strategies to prevent transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). A review of the literature was performed. Despite therapeutic advances in pulmonary and critical care medicine, TRALI is now considered to be one of the leading causes of transfusion-associated mortality, and thus determining how to prevent TRALI is extremely important. Donor and product-management strategies to prevent this life-threatening condition have been suggested, but because of gaps in our understanding of TRALI, blood-bankers do not know how beneficial these interventions will be, nor the amount of potential harm-such as decreasing the availability of blood-that could arise if they were implemented. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the various preventive measures that have been described in the literature. Preventing TRALI poses a difficult challenge for blood-banking experts, because it is unknown which measures will be effective in decreasing the incidence of TRALI and which could have significant drawbacks. Only additional research into TRALI prevention will provide the answers on how to best protect patients from this potentially fatal reaction.Critical Care Medicine 06/2006; 34(5 Suppl):S137-43. · 6.33 Impact Factor -
Article: The impact of male-to-male sexual experience on risk profiles of blood donors.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Men who have had sex with men (MSM) since 1977 are permanently deferred from donating blood. Excluding only men who engaged in male-to-male sex within either the prior 12 months or 5 years has been proposed. Little is known about infectious disease risks of MSM who donate blood. Weighted analyses of data from an anonymous mail survey of blood donors were conducted to examine the characteristics of men reporting male-to-male sex during specified time periods. Of the 25,168 male respondents, 569 (2.4%) reported male-to-male sex, 280 (1.2%) since 1977. Compared to donors who did not report male-to-male sex, the prevalence of reactive screening test results was higher among donors who reported the practice within the past 5 years (< or =12 months odds ratio [OR] 5.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-10.4; >12 months to 5 years, OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.2-41.7); however, no significant difference was found for donors who last practiced male-to-male sex more than 5 years ago (>5 years-after 1977, OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.7-2.6; 1977 or earlier, OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7-3.7). The prevalence of unreported deferrable risks (UDRs) other than male-to-male sex was significantly higher for all donors who reported male-to-male sex with ORs ranging from 3.1 to 18.9 (p < or = 0.01). No evidence was found to support changing current policy to permit donations from men who practiced male-to-male sex within the past 5 years. For donors with a more remote history of male-to-male sex, the findings were equivocal. A better understanding of the association between male-to-male sex and other UDRs appears needed.Transfusion 04/2005; 45(3):404-13. · 3.22 Impact Factor -
Article: Estimating blood donor loss due to the variant CJD travel deferral.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The FDA recommended new travel deferrals in May 2002 to prevent the potential transmission of variant CJD (vCJD). The predicted impact of such deferrals on the blood supply was controversial. We distributed anonymous, self-administered questionnaires to donors over 2 weeks in April 2002. Two thousand surveys were allocated to each of five geographic groupings of blood centers in the western and central US. Results were analyzed with chi-squared tests and logistic regression. Of 9800 surveys, 7405 (76%) were returned and analyzed. Overall, 257 (3.47%; 95% CI, 3.05-3.89) donors responding to the survey met the expanded May and November 2002 FDA vCJD travel criteria for deferral. Deferral rates ranged from 1 percent or less in Northern and Southern centers, 3 to 4 percent in San Francisco, California, and Scottsdale, Arizona, to over 13 percent in El Paso, Texas (p < 0.0001). Service at a European military base was the most common reason for deferral, whereas in San Francisco most deferrals were for UK and European travel or residence. The vCJD deferral was also associated with ages 30 through 49 years and with male gender. During June through September 2002, observed deferral rates were 1.6 percent at the same centers. Predicted deferrals due the new vCJD travel criteria depend upon the number of military donors at a blood center, as well as on the age and gender of donors. Actual deferrals were lower than predicted by an anonymous survey.Transfusion 06/2004; 44(5):645-50. · 3.22 Impact Factor
