Publications (5)20.73 Total impact
-
Article: Syntaxin 11 marks a distinct intracellular compartment recruited to the immunological synapse of NK cells to colocalize with cytotoxic granules.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The syntaxin 11 (STX11) gene is mutated in a proportion of patients with familial haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FHL) and exocytosis of cytotoxic granules is impaired in STX11-deficient NK cells. However, the subcellular localization, regulation of expression and molecular function of STX11 in NK cells and other cytotoxic lymphocytes remain unknown. Here we demonstrate that STX11 expression is strictly controlled by several mechanisms in a cell-type-specific manner and that the enzymatic activity of the proteasome is required for STX11 expression in NK cells. In resting NKL cells, STX11 was localized in the cation-dependent mannose-6-phosphate receptor (CD-M6PR)-containing compartment, which was clearly distinct from cytotoxic granules or Rab27a-expressing vesicles. These subcellular structures appeared to fuse at the contact area with NK-sensitive target cells as demonstrated by partial colocalization of STX11 with perforin and Rab27a. Although STX11-deficent allo-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes efficiently lysed target cells and released cytotoxic granules, they exhibited a significantly lower extent of spontaneous association of perforin with Rab27a as compared with STX11-expressing T cells. Thus, our results suggest that STX11 promotes the fusion of Rab27a-expressing vesicles with cytotoxic granules and reveal an additional level of complexity in the spatial/temporal segregation of subcellular structures participating in the process of granule-mediated cytotoxicity.Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 02/2011; 16(1):129-41. · 4.13 Impact Factor -
Article: Switching protein-DNA recognition specificity by single-amino-acid substitutions in the P1 par family of plasmid partition elements.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The P1, P7, and pMT1 par systems are members of the P1 par family of plasmid partition elements. Each has a ParA ATPase and a ParB protein that recognizes the parS partition site of its own plasmid type to promote the active segregation of the plasmid DNA to daughter cells. ParB contacts two parS motifs known as BoxA and BoxB, the latter of which determines species specificity. We found that the substitution of a single orthologous amino acid in ParB for that of a different species has major effects on the specificity of recognition. A single change in ParB can cause a complete switch in recognition specificity to that of another species or can abolish specificity. Specificity changes do not necessarily correlate with changes in the gross DNA binding properties of the protein. Molecular modeling suggests that species specificity is determined by the capacity to form a hydrogen bond between ParB residue 288 and the second base in the BoxB sequence. As changes in just one ParB residue and one BoxB base can alter species specificity, plasmids may use such simple changes to evolve new species rapidly.Journal of bacteriology 12/2008; 191(4):1126-31. · 3.94 Impact Factor -
Article: Species and incompatibility determination within the P1par family of plasmid partition elements.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The P1par family of active plasmid partition systems consists of at least six members, broadly distributed in a variety of plasmid types and bacterial genera. Each encodes two Par proteins and contains a cis-acting parS site. Individual par systems can show distinct species specificities; the proteins from one type cannot function with the parS site of another. P1par-versus-P7par specificity resides within two hexamer BoxB repeats encoded by parS that contact the ParB protein near the carboxy terminus. Here, we examine the species specificity differences between Yersinia pestis pMT1parS and Escherichia coli P1 and P7parS. pMT1parS site specificity could be altered to that of either P1 or P7 by point mutation changes in the BoxB repeats. Just one base change in a single BoxB repeat sometimes sufficed. The BoxB sequence appears to be able to adopt a number of forms that define exclusive interactions with different ParB species. The looped parS structure may facilitate this repertoire of interaction specificities. Different P1par family members have different partition-mediated incompatibility specificities. This property defines whether two related plasmids can coexist in the same cell and is important in promoting the evolution of new plasmid species. BoxB sequence changes that switch species specificity between P1, P7, and pMT1 species switched partition-mediated plasmid incompatibility in concert. Thus, there is a direct mechanistic link between species specificity and partition-mediated incompatibility, and the BoxB-ParB interaction can be regarded as a special mechanism for facilitating plasmid evolution.Journal of Bacteriology 10/2005; 187(17):5977-83. · 3.83 Impact Factor -
Article: Plasmid partition system of the P1par family from the pWR100 virulence plasmid of Shigella flexneri.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: P1par family members promote the active segregation of a variety of plasmids and plasmid prophages in gram-negative bacteria. Each has genes for ParA and ParB proteins, followed by a parS partition site. The large virulence plasmid pWR100 of Shigella flexneri contains a new P1par family member: pWR100par. Although typical parA and parB genes are present, the putative pWR100parS site is atypical in sequence and organization. However, pWR100parS promoted accurate plasmid partition in Escherichia coli when the pWR100 Par proteins were supplied. Unique BoxB hexamer motifs within parS define species specificities among previously described family members. Although substantially different from P1parS from the P1 plasmid prophage of E. coli, pWR100parS has the same BoxB sequence. As predicted, the species specificity of the two types proved identical. They also shared partition-mediated incompatibility, consistent with the proposed mechanistic link between incompatibility and species specificity. Among several informative sequence differences between pWR100parS and P1parS is the presence of a 21-bp insert at the center of the pWR100parS site. Deletion of this insert left much of the parS activity intact. Tolerance of central inserts with integral numbers of helical DNA turns reflects the critical topology of these sites, which are bent by binding the host IHF protein.Journal of Bacteriology 06/2005; 187(10):3369-73. · 3.83 Impact Factor -
Article: The role of Par proteins in the active segregation of the P1 plasmid.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The parS centromere-like site promotes active P1 plasmid segregation in the presence of P1 ParA and ParB proteins. At the modest growth rate used here, time-lapse and still photomicroscopy shows that the plasmid copies are clustered as a focus at the Escherichia coli cell centre. Just before cell division, the focus is actively divided and ejects bidirectionally into opposite halves of the dividing cell. In the absence of the wild-type parS binding protein ParB, a focus was formed, but generally did not go to the cell centre. The randomly placed focus did not divide and was inherited by one daughter cell only. In the absence of ParA, foci formed and frequently fixed to the cell centre. However, they failed to divide or eject and were left at the new cell pole of one cell at division. Thus, ParB appears to be required for recognition of the plasmid and its attachment to the cell centre, and ParA is required for focus division and energetic ejection from the cell centre. The ATPase active site mutation, parAK122E, blocked ejection. Mutant parAM314I ejected weakly, and the daughter foci took two generations to reach a new cell centre. This explains the novel alternation of segregation and missegregation in successive generations seen in time-lapse images of this mutant.Molecular Microbiology 08/2004; 53(1):93-102. · 5.01 Impact Factor
Top co-authors
Top Journals
Institutions
-
2011
-
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, MD, USA
-
-
2004–2008
-
National Cancer Institute (USA)
- Gene Regulation and Chromosome Biology Laboratory
Bethesda, MD, USA
-
