-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that often results in joint pain, inflammation and bone erosions. Perhaps the most notable change in RA treatment during the last decade is the advent of biologics, and, in particular, anti-tumour necrosis factor agents. Given these advances, it is useful to assess how healthcare and work-loss costs of patients with RA have changed.
Our objective was to assess changes in healthcare utilization and costs from 1997 to 2006 for patients diagnosed with RA.
Two cohorts (1997 and 2006) of patients with RA and matched controls were identified from two administrative claims databases along with subsamples of employed patients and matched controls. The analysis focused on the more homogeneous employee subsample. We compared annual excess co-morbidity rates, resource utilization and healthcare and work-loss costs per patient between the 1997 (n = 279) and 2006 cohorts (n = 837) with difference-in-differences methodology. Results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
In the employee subsample, there were no statistically significant differences in the excess prevalence of non-RA co-morbidities or Charlson Co-morbidity Index results, except for cardiovascular disease, which decreased by 11.1%. Excess number of ED visits and days hospitalized decreased by 1.1 visits/patient and 0.9 days/patient, respectively, while rheumatologist visits increased by 0.9 visits/patient. Excess per-patient direct costs were unchanged. However, drug costs increased by $US633/patient, but medical costs decreased by $US618/patient (not significant) [year 2006 values].
For employed patients with RA, there were significant reductions in per-patient excess hospital days, as well as ED visits, and no changes in excess total direct costs over time. New treatments introduced during the study period may be associated with cost savings that offset changes in employee utilization of drug and medical services. In addition, the reductions in excess ED visits and hospital days suggest improvements in patient quality of life.
PharmacoEconomics 03/2012; 30(4):323-36. · 2.66 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare the impact of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and of adalimumab on initial and sustained improvement in HRQL for patients with active AS versus the general US population.
Data from the 5-year ATLAS trial were analysed. HRQL burden of AS and treatment impact on HRQL were assessed by comparing health status and utility scores from ATLAS (Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36] and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 [HUI3]) with population norms.
Baseline scores for all measures were comparable between adalimumab and placebo. All scores for both groups were significantly worse than general population norms (all p<0.0001). Within- and between-group improvements in SF-36 Physical Component Summary and SF-6D scores from baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 were clinically relevant for patients receiving adalimumab. For patients initially randomised to adalimumab, HRQL scores improved from Weeks 25 to 52 and remained relatively stable through 3 years but remained lower than for the general US population at all time points.
Findings demonstrate a significant burden of AS on HRQL. Treatment with adalimumab significantly improved physical functioning and other measures of HRQL compared with placebo. Clinically relevant improvements in HRQL outcomes over 3 years represent a significant benefit of adalimumab. Because of the advanced AS disease, patient health status remained below that of the general population. Treatment earlier in the course of AS may be needed to restore HRQL to the level of the general population.
Clinical and experimental rheumatology 07/2011; 29(4):624-32. · 2.15 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To estimate comprehensive cost of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients to society and individual stakeholders, including patients/employees, employers, family members/caregivers, and government.
Administrative claims databases covering privately insured and Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries in the US were used to compute the excess payer and beneficiary-paid costs per patient with RA compared with matched controls. Similarly, per-person excess costs for caregivers and uninsured patients with RA were estimated. Costs were estimated for other burdens, including costs of work-loss to employers, adaptations to home and work environments, lost on-the-job productivity, informal and hired care/household help, and job turnover costs. Intangible costs associated with quality-of-life deterioration were estimated based on legal system jury awards, whereas costs for premature mortality were based on lifetime earnings data. Per-capita cost estimates were weighted by the relevant population to estimate societal costs. Because data were incomplete, several assumptions were required; these assumptions could lead to an over- or under-estimation of cost burdens.
Annual excess health care costs of RA patients were $8.4 billion, and costs of other RA consequences were $10.9 billion. These costs translate to a total annual cost of $19.3 billion. From a stakeholder perspective, 33% of the total cost was allocated to employers, 28% to patients, 20% to the government, and 19% to caregivers. Adding intangible costs of quality-of-life deterioration ($10.3 billion) and premature mortality ($9.6 billion), total annual societal costs of RA (direct, indirect, and intangible) increased to $39.2 billion.
Societal costs of RA in the US are $19.3 billion and $39.2 billion (in 2005 dollars) without and with intangible costs, respectively. This study was one of the first to attempt to quantify the comprehensive burdens of RA. Despite several assumptions made in areas in which few data exist, the findings generate useful insights into the full burden of RA.
Current Medical Research and Opinion 11/2009; 26(1):77-90. · 2.38 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) greatly affects patients' abilities to perform work, which can translate into substantial employer costs. We developed a customizable model that allows employers to calculate workplace impacts of RA therapies in employees with RA.
Costs of medical leave (absenteeism)/disability, reduced productivity, job turnover, and work-equipment adaptations for employees with RA were calculated. Costs of the tumor necrosis factor antagonist adalimumab were compared with those of other RA treatments. Default parameters were based on literature, clinical trials, government sources, and employers' data.
Annual per-employee workplace cost was $9071 for adalimumab versus $16,335 for other RA therapies. Costs included reduced productivity (57%), absenteeism/disability (21%), and job turnover (21%).
RA imposes a large financial burden on employers, predominantly owing to lost productivity. When compared with other RA therapies, adalimumab substantially reduced employers' costs.
Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 09/2009; 51(10):1167-76. · 1.88 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes pain and serious functional impacts and substantially affects patients' daily lives, including their ability to work.
This review examines recent studies of patients with RA treated with TNF antagonists and the impacts these therapies have on the workplace.
A total of 133 articles and 14 poster abstracts were reviewed that matched specific criteria.
The results of early studies of TNF antagonists varied regarding their effects on patients with RA in the workplace. However, recent studies of adalimumab showed positive impacts across a range of workplace burdens. Treatments such as adalimumab may help employees with RA to remain in the workforce and lead to reduced workplace costs to the employers and employees.
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 03/2009; 10(2):255-69. · 3.20 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To estimate the comparative lifetime cost-effectiveness of sequenced therapy with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists as the initial therapeutic intervention for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Because patients with RA switch regimens many times throughout the course of disease, sequenced therapeutic interventions were modeled, continuing until the last effective agent failed or death occurred. The model used published clinical outcomes from short-term, randomized controlled trials. Direct treatment costs and costs of lost productivity were modeled for each of 5 alternative treatment sequences. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are expressed as quality-adjusted lifeyears (QALY) gained.
Treatment sequences that included TNF antagonists produced a greater number of QALY than conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drug regimens alone. The cost-effectiveness of sequenced therapy initiated with adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) extendedly dominated both infliximab-plus-MTX-initiated and etanercept sequences. The cost of adalimumab plus MTX per QALY was US $47,157 excluding productivity losses, and $19,663 including productivity losses. A supplementary sequence that incorporated adalimumab-plus-MTX-initiated first-line therapy followed by another TNF antagonist as second-line therapy was modeled; this sequence resulted in additional QALY gained and extendedly dominated all single-TNF strategies.
Of the 3 single-TNF antagonist sequences, the adalimumab-plus-MTX-initiated sequence was cost-effective in producing the greatest number of QALY. Multiple TNF strategies, such as the supplementary sequence modeled in this analysis, may be cost-effective in producing even greater health gain.
The Journal of Rheumatology 12/2008; 36(1):16-26. · 3.69 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To describe dosing patterns for tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from health care provider and payer point of interest.
Using privately insured US claims data from 31 large employers covering 31 companies across the US, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were identified and three cohorts were defined based on first TNF-antagonist treatment (adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab) administered after January 1, 2003. Dosage-adjustment patterns were assessed during the following 12-month period. Changes in dosage (both increases and decreases) and maintenance of a stable dosage were evaluated. For the health care provider point of interest, a new algorithm was developed to assess treatment patterns with chronic injectable therapies that incorporated the potential inconsistency between days of supply and prescription-gap data, thus providing the actual use of TNF-antagonist treatment. For the payer, usage data addressed whether the TNF antagonist was used at a greater dosage than recommended. Differences in baseline characteristics and dosage change rates between cohorts were tested using Chi-Square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables.
From the health care provider point of interest, 83.4% of adalimumab-treated patients (n = 205) initially received the recommended dosage, 10.2% received less, and 6.3% received more; 87.7% of etanercept-treated patients (n = 455) initially received the recommended dosage, 11.2% received less, and 1.1% received more; and 83.8% of infliximab-treated patients (n = 148) started with 2-4 vials (the recommended dosage is based on the weight of the patient, not total milligrams). All treatments had similar dosage decrease and discontinuation rates. Maintenance of stable dosage was lower for infliximab (20.9%) than adalimumab (37.1%) and etanercept (39.1%); both p < 0.01. The infliximab dosage-increase rate (35.1%) was greater than adalimumab (3.9%) and etanercept (0); both p < 0.01. From the payer point of interest, dosage-increase rate was greater for infliximab (28.3%) than adalimumab (8.7%) and etanercept (6.9%), both p < 0.01.
Infliximab had greater dosage-increase rates than adalimumab and etanercept. Adalimumab and etanercept had similar dosage-increase rates. All treatments had similar dosage-decrease and discontinuation rates. Maintenance of stable dosage was lower for infliximab than for adalimumab and etanercept. The study has the usual limitation of claims data analysis in that clinical details might be insufficient to draw causal inference.
Current Medical Research and Opinion 06/2008; 24(8):2229-40. · 2.38 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare the effect of adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX monotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and work activities in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Patients in this PREMIER study subanalysis (n = 525) were randomized to adalimumab 40 mg every other week plus MTX or MTX monotherapy. Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores of RA patients were compared with US population norms at Weeks 12, 52, and 104.
Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores at Week 12 for both groups improved from baseline and were significantly lower than US population scores (43.5 combination, 39.4 MTX, 49.4 US norm; p< 0.001). At Week 52, PCS score for adalimumab plus MTX was similar to that of the US population (47.5 vs 48.3; p = 0.25), while the PCS score for MTX was not similar to that of the US population (44.2 vs 48.3; p < 0.001). Criterion- and content-based interpretations for between-treatment differences in PCS scores suggest that those receiving combination therapy had fewer employment difficulties than those receiving MTX.
After 2 years, HRQOL for patients with early RA treated with adalimumab plus MTX improved to US norms. Combination therapy had reduced the influence of RA on work activity.
The Journal of Rheumatology 02/2008; 35(2):206-15. · 3.69 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare the cost of care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept.
RA patients were identified from a privately insured database. Three mutually exclusive treatment cohorts were formed based on the date of first tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist treatment (index date) after January 1, 2003. Baseline characteristics were assessed in the 3-month pretreatment period. Healthcare (i.e., medical service and prescription medications) utilization and cost were assessed for the following 12 months. RA-related medical cost included the total cost for medical service associated with RA diagnosis. RA-related healthcare cost included RA-related medical and drug cost. Uneven distribution of baseline characteristics were adjusted with the propensity score method. Cost was compared between treatment cohorts.
Twelve-month TNF-antagonist therapy cost ($12 853 vs. 17 299, p = 0.002), total RA-related drug cost ($13 794 vs. 17 647, p = 0.006), total RA-related medical cost ($971 vs. 2920, p < 0.001), total RA-related healthcare cost ($14 764 vs. 20 566, p = 0.002), and total drug cost ($16 210 vs. 19 769, p = 0.028) were significantly less for adalimumab (n = 217) than infliximab (n = 234). Twelve-month healthcare cost for adalimumab was comparable to etanercept (n = 546).
Annual healthcare cost for adalimumab patients was significantly less than for infliximab patients and was comparable to etanercept patients. This analysis is subject to the usual limitation of claims data analyses in that few clinical details are available and causal inference conclusions are limited.
Current Medical Research and Opinion 09/2007; 23(8):1749-59. · 2.38 Impact Factor
