William F Pirl

St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Are you William F Pirl?

Claim your profile

Publications (40)260.64 Total impact

  • Article: Depression and undertreatment of depression: potential risks and outcomes in black patients with lung cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the United States, Black men are at higher risk than White men for lung cancer mortality whereas rates are comparable between Black and White women. This article draws from empirical work in lung cancer, mental health, and health disparities to highlight that race and depression may overlap in predicting lower treatment access and utilization and poorer quality of life among patients. Racial barriers to depression identification and treatment in the general population may compound these risks. Prospective data are needed to examine whether depression plays a role in racial disparities in lung cancer outcomes.
    Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 03/2013; 31(2):123-35. · 0.98 Impact Factor
  • Article: A Pilot Study To Investigate Adherence to Long-Acting Opioids among Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Uncontrolled pain remains prevalent in patients with advanced cancer and has been associated with worse quality of life and greater health care utilization. Poor adherence to analgesics may represent a modifiable barrier to pain management. Objective: This pilot study aimed to establish feasibility/utility of evaluating self-reported adherence to long-acting (LA) opioids in patients with advanced lung cancer, and to explore rates and correlates of adherence. Methods: Consecutive patients attending an ambulatory thoracic oncology clinic with a diagnosis of advanced lung cancer and a current LA opioid regimen were approached to complete a brief questionnaire during their clinic visit. Participants reported LA opioid adherence during the past 4 weeks (0%-100%) and knowledge of their LA opioid regimen, and completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) depression screen. Demographic and clinical information were confirmed via electronic health record review. Results: Fifty-four eligible patients were approached to reach our target sample (n=50; enrollment=92.6%). Self-reported adherence to LA opioids was 85.4% (standard deviation [SD]=21.0). Twenty-eight percent reported a frequency of medication use that did not match the prescribed daily frequency. Lower adherence was associated with inaccurate frequency (p=0.004), positive depression screen (p=0.005), and older age (p=0.04). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the feasibility of integrating self-report assessments of LA opioid adherence into a thoracic oncology clinic. Patients reported high adherence, but more than one-quarter did not accurately report the prescribed frequency of daily doses. Understanding of LA opioid regimens may be a critical indicator of adherence in patients with advanced cancer.
    Journal of palliative medicine 02/2013; · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • Article: Depression, survival, and epidermal growth factor receptor genotypes in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Although depression appears to be associated with worse survival from cancer, the underlying mechanisms of this association are unknown. Tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotype is a known predictor of survival in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and appears to be associated with depression. We hypothesized that tumor EGFR genotype may account for a relationship between depression and survival in this population. We investigated this possible relationship in a cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC, in which we had previously demonstrated an association between depression and worse survival. Method: A cohort of 151 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC were enrolled and followed in a randomized controlled trial of early palliative care. At enrollment, 150 had depression assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and categorical scoring for major depressive syndrome (MDS) was used for analyses. Patients with tumor tissue available underwent EGFR genotyping. Associations with survival were tested using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Twenty-one patients (14.0%) met criteria for MDS. Forty-four patients (29.3%) had EGFR genotyping, and 17 (38.6%) of these harbored EGFR mutations. Patients with EGFR mutations had significantly lower PHQ-9 scores (p = 0.03), and none met criteria for depression. EGFR mutations were significantly associated with superior survival (p = 0.02). When both depression and EGFR genotype were simultaneously entered into the model, only EGFR mutations remained significantly associated with survival (p = 0.02), and the effect of depression was attenuated. Significance of results: Depression is associated with worse survival in metastatic NSCLC, and this relationship may be at least partially explained by tumor EGFR genotype. Further study into whether depression could be associated with specific biologic properties of cancer that vary by genotype is warranted.
    Palliative and Supportive Care 02/2013;
  • Article: Early Palliative Care in Advanced Lung Cancer: A Qualitative Study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND Early ambulatory palliative care (PC) is an emerging practice, and its key elements have not been defined. We conducted a qualitative analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial that demonstrated improved quality of life, mood, and survival in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who received early PC integrated with standard oncologic care vs standard oncologic care alone. Our objectives were to (1) identify key elements of early PC clinic visits, (2) explore the timing of key elements, and (3) compare the content of PC and oncologic visit notes at the critical time points of clinical deterioration and radiographic disease progression. METHODS We randomly selected 20 patients who received early PC and survived within 4 periods: less than 3 months (n = 5), 3 to 6 months (n = 5), 6 to 12 months (n = 5), and 12 to 24 months (n = 5). We performed content analysis on PC and oncologic visit notes from the electronic health records of these patients. RESULTS Addressing symptoms and coping were the most prevalent components of the PC clinic visits. Initial visits focused on building relationships and rapport with patients and their families and on illness understanding, including prognostic awareness. Discussions about resuscitation preferences and hospice predominantly occurred during later visits. Comparing PC and oncologic care visits around critical time points, both included discussions about symptoms and illness status; however, PC visits emphasized psychosocial elements, such as coping, whereas oncologic care visits focused on cancer treatment and management of medical complications. CONCLUSIONS Early PC clinic visits emphasize managing symptoms, strengthening coping, and cultivating illness understanding and prognostic awareness in a responsive and time-sensitive model. During critical clinical time points, PC and oncologic care visits have distinct features that suggest a key role for PC involvement and enable oncologists to focus on cancer treatment and managing medical complications.
    JAMA internal medicine. 01/2013;
  • Article: Electronic Prompt to Improve Outpatient Code Status Documentation for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSERates of documentation of end-of-life care preferences in the medical record remain low, even among patients with incurable malignancies. We therefore conducted a two-phase study to develop and assess the effect of electronic prompts to encourage oncology clinicians to document code status in the outpatient electronic health record (EHR) of patients with advanced lung cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS To determine the optimal delivery, content, and timing of the electronic prompt, we first facilitated focus groups with oncology clinicians at an affiliated medical center. Given this feedback, we developed e-mail reminders timed to the start of each new chemotherapy regimen. Between July 2009 and January 2011, 102 eligible patients with incurable lung cancer were approached, and 100 agreed to participate. We compared e-mail prompt participants (EPPs) with a cohort of 100 consecutive historical controls who began therapy for incurable lung cancer at least 1 year before the start of this study. The primary outcome measure was clinician documentation of code status in the EHR.ResultsEPPs were similar to historical controls, with no significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics. At 1-year follow-up, 33.7% (n = 33/98) of EPPs had a code status documented in the outpatient EHR compared with 14.5% (n = 12/83) of historical controls (P = .003). Mean time to code status documentation was significantly shorter in EPPs (8.6 months [95% CI, 7.6 to 9.5]) compared with controls (10.5 months [95% CI, 9.8 to 11.3]; P = .004). CONCLUSIONe-mail prompts may improve the rate and timing of code status documentation in the EHR and warrant further investigation.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 01/2013; · 18.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Early palliative care and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Potential mechanisms of prolonged survival.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with advanced cancer experience a significant burden of physical symptoms and psychological distress at the end of life, and many elect to receive aggressive cancer-directed therapy. The goal of palliative care is to relieve suffering and promote quality of life (QOL) for patients and families. Traditionally, both the public and medical community have conceptualized the need for patients to make a choice between pursuing curative therapy or receiving palliative care. However, practice guidelines from the World Health Organization and leadership from the oncology and palliative care communities advocate a different model of palliative care that is introduced from the point of diagnosis of life-threatening illness. Early palliative care has been shown to provide benefits in QOL, mood, and health care utilization. Additionally, preliminary research has suggested that in contrast to fears about palliative care hastening death, referral to palliative care earlier in the course of illness may have the potential to lengthen survival, particularly in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer. This review summarizes the literature on potential survival benefits of palliative care and presents a model of how early integrated palliative care could potentially influence survival in patients with advanced cancer.
    Chronic Respiratory Disease 01/2013; 10(1):35-47.
  • Article: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety in Patients with Terminal Cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction. Patients with terminal cancer often experience marked anxiety that is associated with poor quality of life. Although cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based treatment for anxiety disorders, the approach needs to be adapted to address realistic concerns related to having cancer, such as worries about disease progression, disability, and death. In this pilot randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00706290), we examined the feasibility and potential efficacy of brief CBT to reduce anxiety in patients with terminal cancer.Methods. We adapted CBT by developing treatment modules targeting skills for relaxation, coping with cancer worries, and activity pacing. Adults with incurable malignancies and elevated anxiety based on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) were randomly assigned to individual CBT or a waitlist control group. Primary outcomes included the number of completed CBT visits and the change in HAM-A scores from baseline to 8-week follow-up per a treatment-blind evaluator. The feasibility criterion was 75% adherence to the intervention.Results. We randomized 40 patients with terminal cancers to CBT (n = 20) or waitlist control (n = 20) groups; 70% completed posttreatment assessments. Most patients who received CBT (80%) participated in at least five of the required six therapy sessions. Analysis of covariance models, adjusted for baseline scores, showed that those assigned to CBT had greater improvements in HAM-A scores compared to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference of -5.41 (95% confidence interval: -10.78 to -0.04) and a large effect size for the intervention (Cohen's d = 0.80).Conclusion. Providing brief CBT tailored to the concerns of patients with terminal cancer was not only feasible but also led to significant improvements in anxiety.
    The Oncologist 06/2012; · 3.91 Impact Factor
  • Article: Depression and survival in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: effects of early palliative care.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a randomized trial, early palliative care (EPC) in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was observed to improve survival. In a secondary analysis, we explored the hypothesis that the survival benefit resulted from improving depression. In total, 151 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC participated in a randomized trial of EPC integrated with standard oncology care versus standard oncology care alone. Depression was assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and was scored diagnostically by using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, criteria for major depression syndrome (MDS). Depression response was considered ≥ 50% reduction in PHQ-9 scores at 12 weeks. Survival differences were tested with log-rank and Cox proportional hazards models. At baseline, 21 patients (14%) met MDS criteria. MDS significantly predicted worse survival (hazard ratio, 1.82; P = .02). Patients assigned to EPC had greater improvements in PHQ-9 scores at 12 weeks (P < .001); among patients with MDS, those receiving EPC had greater rates of depression response at 12 weeks (P = .04). However, improvement in PHQ-9 scores was not associated with improved survival, except in a sensitivity analysis in which patients who died before 12 weeks were modeled to have worse depression. The group randomly assigned to EPC remained independently associated with survival after adding improvement in PHQ-9 scores to the survival model. Depression predicted worse survival in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC. Although EPC was associated with greater improvement in depression at 12 weeks, the data do not support the hypothesis that treatment of depression mediated the observed survival benefit from EPC.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 03/2012; 30(12):1310-5. · 18.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Evidence-based treatment of anxiety in patients with cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anxiety is a dynamic response to perceived threat that is common among patients with cancer and fluctuates at critical points in the disease trajectory. A substantial minority of patients may experience clinically significant anxiety resulting from a range of potential etiologic factors. This review summarizes evidence-based recommendations for treatment of anxiety in oncology settings. Recommendations are based on the nature and time course of anxiety and the results of meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and individual trials in cancer populations. The evidence-based literature supports the use of psychosocial and psychopharmacologic treatments to prevent or alleviate anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: are tempered by study heterogeneity and methodologic limitations and a lack of trials that included patients with clinically significant anxiety. In oncology settings, accessibility and acceptability of evidence-based treatments vary, and patients may seek a variety of resources to manage cancer concerns. Treatment planning should incorporate contributing factors to anxiety and patient preferences for psychiatric care.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 03/2012; 30(11):1197-205. · 18.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Comparison of self-reported cognitive difficulties in a national sample of long-term cancer survivors and cancer-naive controls.
    Ilana M Braun, Sowmya R Rao, William F Pirl
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence that long-term cancer survivors (LTCS) experience greater cognitive dysfunction than individuals without cancer is mixed. This analysis of a population-based sample of United States residents compares self-reported cognitive difficulties in LTCS and cancer naïve controls (CNC), controlling for psychiatric disorders. National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R) interviews were conducted in a nationally-representative sample of 9282 people, of whom 5692 were assessed for cancer history. Long-term survivors of adult cancers were defined as individuals who were at least 18 years old at time of diagnosis; greater than 5 years following diagnosis; and with cancer reportedly in remission or cured. Cognitive dysfunction queries included two screening questions and five items drawn than the World Health Organization (WHO) Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Psychiatric disorders were identified using the WHO's Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from multivariable logistic regression models fit to evaluate the relationship between cancer status (LTCS versus CNC) and cognitive symptoms. Of NCS-R participants, 225 met criteria for LTCS and 3953 for CNC. Long-term cancer survivors and CNC screened positive for cognitive symptoms at a rate of 19.5% and 20.8%, respectively, for the first screen and 16.0% and 16.4%, respectively, for the second. Adjusting for demographic and psychiatric variables, LTCS did not carry increased odds of experiencing cognitive symptoms [(OR) 1.00 (95% CI, .59 to 1.68); (OR) .95 (95 %CI, .57 to 1.59)]. Self-reported cognitive symptoms are common among LTCS and CNC. LTCS do not report cognitive symptoms with greater frequency.
    Psychosomatics 01/2012; 53(1):68-74. · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • Article: Effect of early palliative care on chemotherapy use and end-of-life care in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prior research shows that introducing palliative care soon after diagnosis for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with improvements in quality of life, mood, and survival. We sought to investigate whether early palliative care also affects the frequency and timing of chemotherapy use and hospice care for these patients. This secondary analysis is based on a randomized controlled trial of 151 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC presenting to an outpatient clinic at a tertiary cancer center from June 2006 to July 2009. Participants received either early palliative care integrated with standard oncology care or standard oncology care alone. By 18-month follow-up, 133 participants (88.1%) had died. Outcome measures included: first, number and types of chemotherapy regimens, and second, frequency and timing of chemotherapy administration and hospice referral. The overall number of chemotherapy regimens did not differ significantly by study group. However, compared with those in the standard care group, participants receiving early palliative care had half the odds of receiving chemotherapy within 60 days of death (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.99; P = .05), a longer interval between the last dose of intravenous chemotherapy and death (median, 64.00 days [range, 3 to 406 days] v 40.50 days [range, 6 to 287 days]; P = .02), and higher enrollment in hospice care for longer than 1 week (60.0% [36 of 60 patients] v 33.3% [21 of 63 patients]; P = .004). Although patients with metastatic NSCLC received similar numbers of chemotherapy regimens in the sample, early palliative care optimized the timing of final chemotherapy administration and transition to hospice services, key measures of quality end-of-life care.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 12/2011; 30(4):394-400. · 18.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Clinical correlates of suicidal thoughts in patients with advanced cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: : Cancer patients are at heightened risk of suicide. Clinical correlates of suicidal ideation in advanced cancer patients were examined to identify those at risk and to inform the development of interventions to reduce suicidal ideation in this vulnerable group. : Coping with Cancer (CwC) is an NCI- and NIMH-funded multiinstitutional investigation examining psychosocial influences on the quality of life and care of advanced cancer patients. Baseline face-to-face interviews that assessed mental and physical functioning, coping, spirituality, and use of mental health services were conducted with 700 advanced cancer patients. : Compared with patients without suicidal ideation, the 8.9% of patients who reported suicidal thoughts were more likely to be white and report no affiliation with an organized religion (p < 0.05). Adjusted analyses revealed that cancer patients who met criteria for current panic disorder (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 3.24 [1.01-10.4]) and posttraumatic stress disorder (3.97 [1.13-14.1]), who accessed mental health services (3.70 [2.07-6.67]), particularly psychotherapy (2.62 [1.20-5.71]), who were not feeling well physically, and who lacked a sense of self-efficacy, spirituality, and being supported were more likely than others to report thoughts of suicide (p < 0.05). : Advanced cancer patients who report suicidal thoughts are more likely to meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder and panic disorder, feel unsupported, lack a religious affiliation, spirituality, and a sense of self-efficacy, and experience more physical distress. Palliative care interventions that promote a sense of self-efficacy, spirituality, and support while minimizing physical distress may offer promise for reducing suicidal thoughts in this at-risk group.
    The American journal of geriatric psychiatry: official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry 10/2011; 20(4):327-36. · 3.35 Impact Factor
  • Article: Tumor epidermal growth factor receptor genotype and depression in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Depression appears to be associated with worse survival from cancer, but underlying mechanisms for this association are unknown. In the present study, we explored the degree to which tumor genotype may be associated with depression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We examined differences in depression severity and rates of positive screens for major depressive disorder among newly diagnosed patients with stage IV NSCLC and known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotype. Newly diagnosed patients (n = 53) with metastatic NSCLC attending an initial thoracic oncology consultation completed self-report questionnaires regarding demographics, smoking behavior, and depression before meeting with their oncologist. Biopsy samples were subsequently genotyped, including screening for EGFR mutations. We conducted a retrospective chart review to obtain clinical data, including tumor stage, performance status, and EGFR genotype. Twelve patients (22.6%) tested positive for EGFR mutation. No EGFR mutation-positive cases met the screening criteria for major depressive disorder, in comparison with 29.3% of patients with wild-type EGFR (p = .03). Mutations of EGFR were also associated with lower depression severity than with wild-type EGFR, independent of gender, performance status, and smoking history (p < .05). This finding persisted for both the cognitive-affective and somatic domains of depression symptoms. EGFR mutations were associated with lower depression severity and lower rates of probable major depressive disorder in patients with metastatic NSCLC, based on mood screening performed before results of genotyping were known. Findings support further work to explore the directionality of the associations and potential biological pathways to depression.
    The Oncologist 08/2011; 16(9):1299-306. · 3.91 Impact Factor
  • Article: Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized study of early palliative care.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding of prognosis among terminally ill patients impacts medical decision making. The aims of this study were to explore perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to examine the effect of early palliative care on these views over time. Patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either early palliative care integrated with standard oncology care or standard oncology care alone. Participants completed baseline and longitudinal assessments of their perceptions of prognosis and the goals of cancer therapy over a 6-month period. We enrolled 151 participants on the study. Despite having terminal cancer, one third of patients (46 of 145 patients) reported that their cancer was curable at baseline, and a majority (86 of 124 patients) endorsed getting rid of all of the cancer as a goal of therapy. Baseline perceptions of prognosis (ie, curability) and goals of therapy did not differ significantly between study arms. A greater percentage of patients assigned to early palliative care retained or developed an accurate assessment of their prognosis over time (82.5% v 59.6%; P = .02) compared with those receiving standard care. Patients receiving early palliative care who reported an accurate perception of their prognosis were less likely to receive intravenous chemotherapy near the end of life (9.4% v 50%; P = .02). Many patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC hold inaccurate perceptions of their prognoses. Early palliative care significantly improves patient understanding of prognosis over time, which may impact decision making about care near the end of life.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 06/2011; 29(17):2319-26. · 18.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Parsing depression from fatigue in patients with cancer using the fatigue symptom inventory.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A central aim in the management of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is to identify treatable causes, such as depression. However, CRF and depression symptoms overlap and frequently co-occur, complicating diagnostic assessment. As cancer-related symptoms have been associated with more functional impairment among patients who are depressed, this study tested the ratio of fatigue interference to fatigue severity as a method for identifying depression cases. Patients who reported that interference was greater than severity were expected to show higher rates of depression as measured by self-report instrument or structured interview. A secondary analysis was conducted using data from patients who were attending a hospital thoracic oncology clinic and who completed the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Sample 1, n = 86). Analyses were then replicated in a sample of diverse cancer patients who completed the FSI and a structured clinical interview for depression on presentation to a CRF clinic at the same hospital (Sample 2, n = 39). Receiver operating curve analyses supported use of the FSI interference/severity ratio in distinguishing depression cases and noncases (area under the curve: Sample 1 = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.94; Sample 2 = 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-0.99). With sensitivity and specificity weighted equally, the optimal cutoff was ≥ 1.0 in Sample 1 (sensitivity = 62.5%, specificity = 91.4%) and Sample 2 (sensitivity = 90.9%, specificity=85.7%). A fatigue score pattern in which interference was greater than or equal to severity predicted depression in two patient samples. This ratio may be useful for brief initial screening of depression in the context of fatigue.
    Journal of pain and symptom management 03/2011; 42(1):52-9. · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer have a substantial symptom burden and may receive aggressive care at the end of life. We examined the effect of introducing palliative care early after diagnosis on patient-reported outcomes and end-of-life care among ambulatory patients with newly diagnosed disease. We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer to receive either early palliative care integrated with standard oncologic care or standard oncologic care alone. Quality of life and mood were assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks with the use of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, respectively. The primary outcome was the change in the quality of life at 12 weeks. Data on end-of-life care were collected from electronic medical records. Of the 151 patients who underwent randomization, 27 died by 12 weeks and 107 (86% of the remaining patients) completed assessments. Patients assigned to early palliative care had a better quality of life than did patients assigned to standard care (mean score on the FACT-L scale [in which scores range from 0 to 136, with higher scores indicating better quality of life], 98.0 vs. 91.5; P=0.03). In addition, fewer patients in the palliative care group than in the standard care group had depressive symptoms (16% vs. 38%, P=0.01). Despite the fact that fewer patients in the early palliative care group than in the standard care group received aggressive end-of-life care (33% vs. 54%, P=0.05), median survival was longer among patients receiving early palliative care (11.6 months vs. 8.9 months, P=0.02). Among patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, early palliative care led to significant improvements in both quality of life and mood. As compared with patients receiving standard care, patients receiving early palliative care had less aggressive care at the end of life but longer survival. (Funded by an American Society of Clinical Oncology Career Development Award and philanthropic gifts; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01038271.)
    New England Journal of Medicine 08/2010; 363(8):733-42. · 53.30 Impact Factor
  • Article: Screening for major depression in post-myocardial infarction patients: operating characteristics of the Beck Depression Inventory-II.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the operating characteristics of the Beck-Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the BDI-II cognitive subscale (BDI-II-cog) in screening for major depression (MDD) in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Between October 2003 and July 2005, 131 post-MI patients admitted to an urban academic medical center completed the BDI-II and a semi-structured interview for depression within 72 hours of symptom onset. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, overall correct classification, and likelihood ratios for various cutoff values on both scales were evaluated by comparing scores to interview diagnosis of MDD. Receiver-operator curves (ROC) were also calculated and area under the curve (AUC) measured. The optimal cutoff value for the BDI-II was > or = 16, with a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 92.1%. Cutoff values of > or = 3 or > or = 4 were both acceptable for the BDI-II-cog (sensitivity = 88.2% and 82.4%, respectively; specificity = 81.6% and 88.6 %, respectively). AUC was 0.96 for the BDI-II and 0.89 for the cognitive subscale. Effective depression screening is important in post-MI patients because of depression's independent association with morbidity and mortality following MI. Our results suggest that the BDI-II and its cognitive subscale are effective tools for screening for MDD in post-MI patients.
    The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 01/2010; 40(2):187-97. · 1.03 Impact Factor
  • Article: Depression and failure of cholesterol lowering after acute myocardial infarction.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Depression after acute myocardial infarction (MI) is independently associated with cardiac mortality, but the mechanism explaining this association remains unclear. To our knowledge, there has been no prior study exploring the impact of post-MI depression on lipid lowering, a key secondary prevention measure in post-MI patients. In this prospective observational cohort pilot study, we hypothesized that patients with early post-MI depression would have inferior cholesterol reduction 6 months post-MI compared to nondepressed patients. Patients admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit or a cardiac step-down unit between October 2003 and July 2005 were enrolled in the study within 72 hours of MI. Two weeks post-MI, subjects were assessed for depression using the module for current major depressive disorder (MDD) from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID) and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Information regarding cholesterol levels was collected 6 months after MI. Initial and 6-month cholesterol levels were available for 70 subjects who had 2-week post-MI depression assessments. Post-MI depression, measured both using an interview for MDD and the BDI-II, was associated with inferior cholesterol reduction, with depressed subjects improving their cholesterol levels by approximately 8 mg/dL compared to a cholesterol reduction of 37 mg/dL in nondepressed subjects. Furthermore, depression diagnosed by formal MDD interview (beta=-.301; P<.001) and the BDI-II (beta=-.269; P=.001) continued to be associated with significantly smaller reductions in cholesterol levels on linear regression analyses that accounted for demographic and medical variables. In this exploratory pilot study, early post-MI depression was independently associated with impaired lipid lowering 6 months after MI.
    The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 01/2010; 12(1):PCC.08m00766.
  • Article: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and depression.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 09/2009; 27(23):e49-50; author reply e51. · 18.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Major depressive disorder in long-term cancer survivors: analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prior research is mixed as to whether long-term cancer survivors (LCSs) have higher rates of depression than the general population. This is the first study to compare the rates of major depressive disorder (MDD) between LCSs and people without cancer histories in a nationally representative cross-sectional multistage cluster survey sample, the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R). Between 2001 and 2003, face-to-face interviews were conducted for the NCS-R in a national sample of 9,282 people, of whom 5,692 were assessed for a history of cancer. Participants with cancer diagnoses at least 5 years before the interview were considered LCSs. Survivors of childhood cancers were excluded. Comparing LCSs to those without a cancer history, odds ratios for having a MDD episode in the last 12 months before interview were obtained using multiple logistic regression controlling for demographic and medical variables. Differences in characteristics of those MDD episodes were also compared between groups. Of participants age 23 years or older, 243 LCSs and 4,890 adults without a cancer history were identified in the sample. Adjusting for demographic variables and medical comorbidities, LCSs did not have increased odds of MDD in the last 12 months, with an odds ratio of (OR) 0.99 (95% CI, 0.55 to 1.79). LCSs reported higher mean levels of impairment from MDD in their home, social, and work life, but these differences were not significant. LCSs do not appear to have elevated rates of MDD. However, they may experience greater impairment from MDD compared to those without cancer. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 08/2009; 27(25):4130-4. · 18.37 Impact Factor

Institutions

  • 2013
    • St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
      Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    • Boston Medical Center
      Boston, MA, USA
  • 2002–2013
    • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • • Department of Psychiatry
      • • Department of Medicine
      Boston, MA, USA
  • 2012
    • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
      Boston, MA, USA
  • 2009
    • Partners HealthCare
      Boston, MA, USA
  • 2006
    • Boston University
      Boston, MA, USA
  • 2001
    • Hennepin County Medical Center
      Minneapolis, MN, USA