-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The low alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer suggests that hypofractionated schemes of dose-escalated radiotherapy should be advantageous. We report our experience using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the primary treatment of prostate cancer to assess efficacy and toxicity.
From 2007 to 2010, 70 patients (51 % low risk, 31 % intermediate risk, and 17 % high risk) with localized prostate cancer were treated with SBRT using the CyberKnife system. One-third of patients received androgen deprivation therapy. Doses of 37.5 Gy (n = 29), 36.25 Gy (n = 36), and 35 Gy (n = 5) were administered in five fractions and analyzed as high dose (37.5 Gy) vs. low dose (36.25 and 35 Gy).
At a median 27 and 37 months follow-up, the low and high dose groups' median PSA nadir to date was 0.3 and 0.2 ng/ml, respectively. The 3-year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) was 100 %, 95.0 % and 77.1 % for the low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients. A dose response was observed in intermediate- and high-risk patients with 72 % vs. 100 % 3-year FFBF for the low and high dose groups, respectively (p = 0.0363). Grade III genitourinary toxicities included 4 % acute and 3 % late (all high dose). Potency was preserved in 83 % of hormone naïve patients.
CyberKnife dose escalated SBRT for low-, intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer exhibits favorable efficacy with acceptable toxicity.
Journal of radiation oncology. 03/2013; 2(1):63-70.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To examine the fractionation effect of stereotactic body radiation therapy with a heterogeneous dose distribution. METHODS: Derived from the linear quadratic formula with measurements from a hypothetical 2-cm radiosurgical tumor, the threshold percentage was defined as (α/β(tissue)/α/β(tumor)), the balance α/β ratio was defined as (prescription dose/tissue tolerance*α/β(tumor)), and the balance dose was defined as (tissue tolerance/threshold percentage). RESULTS: With increasing fractions and equivalent peripheral dose to the target, the biological equivalent dose of "hot spots" in a target decreases. The relative biological equivalent doses of serial organs decrease only when the relative percentage of its dose to the prescription dose is above the threshold percentage. The volume of parallel organs at risk decreases only when the tumor's α/β ratio is above the balance α/β ratio and the prescription dose is lower than balance dose. CONCLUSIONS: The potential benefits of fractionation in stereotactic body radiation therapy depend on the complex interplay between the total dose, α/β ratios, and dose differences between the target and the surrounding normal tissues.
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 12/2012; · 4.59 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We present our initial experience with CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in a heavily pretreated group of patients with liver metastases and primary liver tumors. From October 2007 to June 2009, 48 patients were treated at the Philadelphia CyberKnife Center for liver metastases or primary liver tumors. We report on 30 patients with 41 discrete lesions (1-4 tumors per patient) who received an ablative radiation dose (BED ≥ 79.2 Gy10 = 66 Gy EQD2). The treatment goal was to achieve a high SBRT dose to the liver tumor while sparing at least 700 cc of liver from radiation doses above 15 Gy. Twenty-three patients were treated with SBRT for metastatic cancer to the liver; the remainder (n = 7) were primary liver tumors. Eighty-seven percent of patients had prior systemic chemotherapy with a median 24 months from diagnosis to SBRT; 37% had prior liver directed therapy. Local control was assessed for 28 patients (39 tumors) with 4 months or more follow-up. At a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 10-40 months), 14/39 (36%) tumors had documented local failure. A decrease in local failure was found with higher doses of SBRT (p = 0.0237); 55% of tumors receiving a BED ≤ 100 Gy10 (10/18) had local failure compared with 19% receiving a BED > 100 Gy10 (4/21). The 2-year actuarial rate of local control for tumors treated with BED > 100 Gy10 was 75% compared to 38% for those patients treated with BED ≤ 100 Gy10 (p = 0.04). At last follow-up, 22/30 patients (73%) had distant progression of disease. Overall, seven patients remain alive with a median survival of 20 months from treatment and 57 months from diagnosis. To date, no patient experienced persistent or severe adverse effects. Despite the heavy pretreatment of these patients, SBRT was well tolerated with excellent local control rates when adequate doses (BED > 100 Gy10) were used. Median survival was limited secondary to development of further metastatic disease in the majority of patients.
Frontiers in oncology. 01/2012; 2:23.
-
Radiotherapy and Oncology 02/2010; 94(3):384. · 5.58 Impact Factor
