Christian Djurhuus

Novo Nordisk A/S, Lynge, Capital Region, Denmark

Are you Christian Djurhuus?

Claim your profile

Publications (4)9.23 Total impact

  • Article: Cost-effectiveness of somatropin for the treatment of short children born small for gestational age.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Short children born small for gestational age (SGA) may be at increased risk for long-term morbidity and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to their short stature. Normalization of height in childhood and adolescence is possible in such children via the use of the recombinant human growth hormone somatropin. The aim of this study was to determine whether somatropin was a cost-effective treatment option in short children born SGA. A decision analytic model was constructed to calculate the cost-effectiveness of somatropin treatment versus no treatment over the lifetime of a short individual born SGA, from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS). The model was based on patient-level data from a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial that reported the effects of somatropin on final (adult) height in short children born SGA. Health care resource and drug costs associated with each of the treatment arms were considered, and published utility scores were used to calculate improvement in HRQoL. The model calculated incremental costs and incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with somatropin treatment compared with no treatment. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as incremental cost per QALY and cost per centimeter of height gained. Over a patient's lifetime, somatropin (0.033 mg/kg/d) treatment was associated with a height gain of 16.12 cm and a cost per centimeter of height gained of pound4359 compared with no treatment. The incremental cost of somatropin treatment was pound70,263, with a QALY gain of 2.95, resulting in an incremental cost per QALY of pound23,807-below the widely accepted cost-effectiveness threshold in the United Kingdom of pound30,000. In this model, somatropin was a cost-effective treatment option for short children born SGA from the perspective of the UK NHS.
    Clinical Therapeutics 06/2010; 32(6):1068-82. · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • Article: The cost-effectiveness of somatropin treatment for short children born small for gestational age (SGA) and children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in Sweden.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reduction in health-related quality of life is common in children born small for gestational age (SGA) or children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Growth hormone treatment with somatropin in these children leads to normalisation of height. The aim of this study was to determine whether somatropin is a cost-effective treatment option for short children born SGA and GHD children in Sweden. A Markov decision-tree model was used to calculate the relative costs and health benefits associated with somatropin treatment over the lifetime of SGA and GHD children, compared with no treatment. The analysis was undertaken from a Swedish Health Service perspective. As quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) data were not obtained directly in the clinical studies, a degree of uncertainty is related to these results. Sensitivity analyses assessed the degree of uncertainty surrounding central parameters. For short children born SGA, somatropin treatment was associated with an additional 3.29 QALYs at an incremental cost of 792,489 SEK (Swedish Krona), compared with no treatment. For GHD, somatropin treatment resulted in 3.25 additional QALYs at an incremental cost of 391,291 SEK. This equates to an incremental cost per QALY of 240,831 SEK and 120,494 SEK for SGA and GHD, respectively, below a cost-effectiveness threshold of 500,000-600,000 SEK/QALY. Somatropin is a cost-effective treatment strategy in Sweden for children with GHD and SGA. To overcome present study limitations future clinical research should incorporate appropriate quality of life questionnaires.
    Journal of Medical Economics 02/2010; 13(1):168-78.
  • Article: Effects of GH on urea, glucose and lipid metabolism, and insulin sensitivity during fasting in GH-deficient patients.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fasting-related states of distress pose major health problems, and growth hormone (GH) plays a key role in this context. The present study was designed to assess the effects of GH on substrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity during short-term fasting. Six GH-deficient adults underwent 42.5 h of fasting on two occasions, with and without concomitant GH replacement. Palmitate and urea fluxes were measured with the steady-state isotope dilution technique after infusion of [9,10-3H]palmitate and [13C]urea. During fasting with GH replacement, palmitate concentrations and fluxes increased by 50% [palmitate: 378 +/- 42 (GH) vs. 244 +/- 12 micromol/l, P < 0.05; palmitate: 412 +/- 58 (GH) vs. 276 +/- 42 microM, P = 0.05], and urea turnover and excretion decreased by 30-35% [urea rate of appearance: 336 +/- 22 (GH) vs. 439 +/- 43 micromol. kg-1. h-1, P < 0.01; urea excretion: 445 +/- 43 (GH) vs. 602 +/- 74 mmol/24 h, P < 0.05]. Insulin sensitivity (determined by a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp) was significantly decreased [M value: 1.26 +/- 0.06 (GH) vs. 2.07 +/- 0.22 mg. kg-1. min-1, P < 0.01] during fasting with GH replacement. In conclusion, continued GH replacement during fasting in GH-deficient adults decreases insulin sensitivity, increases lipid utilization, and conserves protein.
    AJP Endocrinology and Metabolism 10/2003; 285(4):E737-43. · 4.75 Impact Factor
  • Article: Effects of growth hormone on lipid metabolism in humans.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The most immediate effect of growth hormone (GH) administration in humans is a significant increase in free fatty acids after 1-2 h, reflecting stimulation of lipolysis and ketogenesis. This stimulation represents an important physiological adaptation to stress and fasting. When the capacity of GH to increase lipolysis is blocked, the protein-retaining and insulin-antagonistic effects of GH on glucose metabolism are either abolished or weakened dramatically, compatible with a key role for lipolysis in orchestrating the metabolic actions of GH.
    Growth Hormone & IGF Research 09/2003; 13 Suppl A:S18-21. · 2.16 Impact Factor