Are you Federica Logiodice?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)6.94 Total impact

  • Article: Levels of follicular G-CSF and interleukin-15 appear as noninvasive biomarkers of subsequent successful birth in modified natural in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To explore oocyte competence for subsequent birth. The modified natural IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle was used as an experimental model by measuring levels of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors in individual follicular fluids (FF). A retrospective blinded study. European network of research, Embryo Implantation Control (EMBIC). Single FF from 83 women were analyzed during a modified natural IVF/ICSI cycle, and reproducibility of follicular composition was evaluated over two cycles for 15 patients. Each FF sample was blindly tested to assess levels of 26 factors by bead-based immunoassays. Each mediator was evaluated as a potential biomarker of subsequent birth by multivariate regression analysis. A combination of both FF G-CSF and IL-15 was the optimal model to predict birth (AUC(ROC), 0.85). Birth rates per cycle were 48.9% (16/33) if two good-prognosis criteria were present (FF G-CSF>12 pg/mL and IL-15<7 pg/mL) and 8% (3/36) and 0% (0/14) if, respectively, one or none were present. FF G-CSF was significantly correlated over two cycles (r=.71), suggesting a possible prognostic value of its documentation. Combined follicular G-CSF and IL-15 quantification appears as an efficient and noninvasive method to define oocyte competence for subsequent successful conception in modified natural IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Fertility and sterility 01/2011; 95(1):94-8. · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • Article: Performance evaluation of microbead and ELISA assays for follicular G-CSF: a non-invasive biomarker of oocyte developmental competence for embryo implantation.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: G-CSF in individual follicular fluids correlates with the potential of the corresponding embryo to result in a live birth after transfer in IVF. To evaluate the requirements for routine follicular fluid G-CSF quantification, we compared follicular fluid G-CSF measurements made with two multiplexed microbead assays purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories and R&D Systems, and a commercial G-CSF ELISA (R&D Systems). Individual follicular fluids (n=139) associated with transferred embryos were analysed to determine cytokine profile and the fate of each transferred embryo was recorded. The effect of multiplexing as well as comparison of the respective performances of the microbead assay with a flow cytometry assay was explored. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the performance and sensitivity/specificity of each method for individual follicular fluids. Covariate factors known to influence IVF outcome such as age, serum oestradiol and embryo score were systematically integrated in each analysis. The quantification of follicular fluid G-CSF using microbead assay methodologies, but not ELISA, yielded results showing the utility of follicular fluid G-CSF as a biomarker predictive of a successful delivery (Au(roc): 0.77 [0.68-0.84] (p=0.003) and 0.75 [0.66-0.82] (p=0.004) for Bio-Rad and R&D Systems microbead assays respectively), whereas follicular fluid G-CSF values quantified by ELISA were not predictive (Au(roc):0.61 [0.52-0.70] p=0.84). Microbead assay and flow cytometry appeared similarly efficient for quantifying follicular fluid G-CSF and multiplex versus single-plex assays did not influence the reliability of quantification.
    Journal of Reproductive Immunology 11/2010; 86(2):126-32. · 2.97 Impact Factor