Are you Nicole Moraco?

Claim your profile

Publications (4)31.47 Total impact

  • Article: Predictors of Survival and Recurrence in Primary Leiomyosarcoma.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma is a soft tissue sarcoma whose outcome has historically been confounded by the inclusion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Thus, we sought to determine the factors that predict survival and recurrence in patients with primary leiomyosarcoma alone. METHODS: During 1982-2006, a total of 353 patients with primary resectable leiomyosarcoma were identified from a prospective database. Multivariate analysis was used to assess clinicopathologic factors for association with disease-specific survival (DSS). Competing risk survival analysis was used to determine factors predictive for local and distant recurrence. RESULTS: Of 353 patients, 170 (48 %) presented with extremity, 144 (41 %) with abdominal/retroperitoneal, and 39 (11 %) with truncal tumors. Median age was 57 (range, 18-88) years, and median follow-up was 50 (range, 1-270) months. Most tumors were high grade (75 %), deep (73 %), and completely resected (97 %); median size was 6.0 (range, 0.3-45) cm. Abdominal/retroperitoneal location was associated with worse long-term DSS compared to extremity or trunk (P = 0.005). However, by multivariate analysis, only high grade and size were significant independent predictors of DSS. Overall, 139 patients (39 %) had recurrence: 51 % of those with abdominal/retroperitoneal, 33 % of extremity, and 26 % of truncal disease. Significant independent predictors for local recurrence were size and margin, whereas predictors for distant recurrence were size and grade. Site was not an independent predictor of recurrence; however, late recurrence (>5 years) occurred in 9 % of abdominal/retroperitoneal and 4 % of extremity lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Grade and size are significant independent predictors of DSS and distant recurrence. Long-term follow-up in leiomyosarcoma is important, as late recurrence continues in 6-9 % patients.
    Annals of Surgical Oncology 01/2013; · 4.17 Impact Factor
  • Article: Soft tissue sarcoma diagnosed subsequent to lymphoma is associated with prior radiotherapy and decreased survival.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer survivors are at increased risk for second malignancies, and vigilance is thus required. The authors sought to determine whether there was an association among lymphoma, sarcoma, and the associated treatments for these diseases. From the authors' prospective soft tissue sarcoma (STS) database of 8240 patients, they identified 112 patients with STS and lymphoma treated from 1982 to 2009 who had complete follow-up data. They examined the importance of the initial diagnosis in patients with both STS and lymphoma, in addition to determining the role of radiation therapy, a known inducer of sarcoma. Review of their sarcoma, gastric, urology, breast, and gynecology databases revealed that lymphoma (95%) or leukemia (5%) occurred in 1.6% of STS patients in comparison to 0.5% of patients in the other databases (P < .01; odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-3.8). Patients diagnosed with STS only were more likely to die of disease at 10 years compared with those with STS and lymphoma (P = .006), but this difference was not significant when patients presenting with recurrence or metastases were excluded. Among patients with lymphoma and STS, lymphoma was the first diagnosis in 71% of patients. Median survival after STS diagnosis was shorter when lymphoma was the initial diagnosis (67 vs 170 months, P = .002), and these patients were more likely to have radiation-associated STS (44% vs 3%, P < .001). There was a 3-fold higher incidence of lymphoma in STS patients compared with other solid tumors. The poor prognosis of those diagnosed with both STS and lymphoma was most likely a consequence of prior irradiation. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.
    Cancer 04/2011; 117(20):4756-63. · 4.77 Impact Factor
  • Article: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP): predictors of recurrence and the use of systemic therapy.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is an uncommon soft tissue malignancy that typically presents with local invasion but rarely metastasizes. We examine clinicopathologic factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with primary and recurrent DFSP and evaluate responses to multimodality therapy. Patients treated for DFSP were identified in a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic factors associated with DFS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 244 patients with DFSP were identified. Median follow-up was 50 months. A total of 14 patients had local recurrence (LR), and 2 patients had distant recurrence (DR), with a median time to recurrence of 35 months. At time of last follow-up, 70% and 47% of patients showed no evidence of disease (NED) in the primary (n = 197) and recurrent groups (n = 47), respectively. On univariate analysis, tumor location and depth were associated with DFS in the primary group, while margin status (R1 vs. R0) was associated with DFS in the LR group. On multivariate analysis, only depth (primary group) and margin status (LR group), remained significant. Also, 22 patients had therapy other than surgical resection: 14 radiotherapy, 4 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) only, 2 conventional chemotherapy only, and 2 chemotherapy plus TKI. Responses to other therapies were variable. DFS after treatment for DFSP is strongly predicted by tumor depth in the primary setting and margin status in recurrent tumors. The treatment for DFSP in the primary or recurrent setting is excision with negative margins, resulting in low recurrence rates and infrequent metastatic spread. Multimodality treatment, especially TKI use, can be effective, but is not curative.
    Annals of Surgical Oncology 02/2011; 18(2):328-36. · 4.17 Impact Factor
  • Article: Do radiation-associated soft tissue sarcomas have the same prognosis as sporadic soft tissue sarcomas?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE To determine the prognostic significance of histologic type in radiation-associated soft tissue sarcomas (RASs) and determine whether RASs are associated with an inferior prognosis compared with sporadic soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred thirty primary RASs were identified from 7,649 STS patients from 1982 to 2007. Multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic factors for disease-specific survival (DSS) was performed for RASs, and a multivariate analysis of radiation exposure was also performed for RASs and sporadic sarcomas. A matched-cohort analysis was performed for radiation-associated and sporadic malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). Results Most RASs were high grade (83%), deep (87%), and truncal (61.5%). The median interval between radiation therapy and RAS development was 10 years (range, 1.3 to 74 years), which varied significantly by histologic type (P = .003). The 5-year DSS was 58%, and independent predictors were size > 5 cm, margin positivity, and histologic type. Multivariate analysis of histologic types of primary, high-grade radiation-associated and sporadic STSs showed that RAS was associated with a worse DSS (hazard ratio, 1.7; range, 1.1 to 2.4; P = .007). For pleomorphic MFH-the most common RAS type-the 5-year DSS was 44% versus 66% in a matched cohort of sporadic MFH patients (P = .07). DSS was significantly worse in primary RAS malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) compared with unmatched sporadic MPNSTs (P = .001). CONCLUSION Histologic type, margin status, and tumor size are the most important independent predictors of DSS in patients with RASs. DSS in patients with primary RAS is significantly worse compared with sporadic STS independent of sarcoma histologic type.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 03/2010; 28(12):2064-9. · 18.37 Impact Factor