Sebastian Andrees

Publications of Sebastian Andrees

• Evaluation of RIDOM, MicroSeq, and Genbank services in the molecular identification of Nocardia species.

  Authors: Alexander Mellmann, Joann L Cloud, Sebastian Andrees, Kym Blackwood, Karen C Carroll, Amin Kabani, Andreas Roth, Dag Harmsen

  International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM. 11/2003; 293(5):359-70.

  The molecular identification of Nocardia species, when compared to phenotypic identification, has two primary advantages: rapid turn-around time and improved accuracy. The information content in theThe molecular identification of Nocardia species, when compared to phenotypic identification, has two primary advantages: rapid turn-around time and improved accuracy. The information content in the 5'-end of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene is sufficient for identification of most bacterial species. An evaluation was performed to demonstrate the quality of results provided by two specialized databases (RIDOM and MicroSeq 500 versions 1.1 and 1.4.3, library version 500-0125, respectively) and the more general GenBank database. In addition, these results were compared with phenotypic identifications. Partial 5'-16S rDNA sequences from 64 culture collection strains (DSM, CIP, JCM, and ATCC) were derived, in duplicate, independently in two laboratories. Furthermore, the sequences and the conventional identification results of 91 clinical Nocardia isolates were determined. With the exception of N. soli and N. cummidelens, all Nocardia type strains were distinguishable using 5'-16S rDNA sequencing. Assuming a normal distribution for the pairwise distances of all unique Nocardia sequences and choosing a reporting criterion of > or = 99.12% similarity for a "distinct species", a statistical error probability of 1.0% can be calculated. When the various databases were searched with the clinical isolate sequences RIDOM gave a perfect match in 71.4% of cases whereas MicroSeq yielded a perfect match in only 26.4%. The GenBank service gave a 100% similarity in 59.3% but in 70.4% of these cases the results obtained were not exclusive for a single Nocardia species. Conventional methods gave a correct identification in 59 cases, although most recent taxonomic changes were not taken into account. The RIDOM service (http://www.ridom-rdna.de/) is in the process of making available a comprehensive and high-quality database for bacterial identification purposes and provides excellent results for the majority of Nocardia isolates.

• Phylogeny of the genus Nocardia based on reassessed 16S rRNA gene sequences reveals underspeciation and division of strains classified as Nocardia asteroides into three established species and two unnamed taxons.

  Authors: Andreas Roth, Sebastian Andrees, Reiner M Kroppenstedt, Dag Harmsen, Harald Mauch

  Journal of clinical microbiology. 03/2003; 41(2):851-6.

  Conventional identification of Nocardia in the routine laboratory remains problematic due to a paucity of reliable phenotypic tests and due to the yet-unresolved taxonomy of strains classified asConventional identification of Nocardia in the routine laboratory remains problematic due to a paucity of reliable phenotypic tests and due to the yet-unresolved taxonomy of strains classified as belonging to the species Nocardia asteroides, which comprises the type strain and isolates with drug pattern types II and VI. The 16S rRNA gene of 74 representative strains of the genus Nocardia, encompassing 25 established species, was sequenced in order to provide a molecular basis for accurate species identification and with the aim of reassessing the phylogeny of taxons assigned to the species N. asteroides. The result of this phylogenetic analysis confirms that the interspecies heterogeneity of closely related nocardial species can be considerably low (a sequence divergence of only 0.5% was found between N. paucivorans and N. brevicatena). We observed a sequence microheterogeneity (sequence divergence of fewer than five bases) in 8 of 11 species of which more than one strain in the species was studied. At least 10 taxons were found that merit description as new species. Strains previously classified as N. asteroides fell into five distinct phylogenetic groups: the type strain cluster (N. asteroides sensu strictu), N. abscessus, N. cyriacigeorgica, and two clusters closely related to N. carnea or N. flavorosea. The strains within the latter two groups probably represent new species, pending further genetic and phenotypic evaluation. Restricted phenotypic data revealed that N. abscessus, N. cyriacigeorgica, and the two Nocardia species taxons are equivalent to drug patterns I, VI, and II, respectively. In the future, these data will help in finding species-specific markers after adoption of a more precise nomenclature for isolates closely related to N. asteroides and unravel confusing phenotypic data obtained in the past for unresolved groups of strains that definitely belong to separate taxons from a phylogenetic point of view.