Rami Manochakian

Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA

Are you Rami Manochakian?

Claim your profile

Publications (3)6.68 Total impact

  • Article: An assessment of patient sign-outs conducted by University at Buffalo internal medicine residents.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Internal medicine residents were surveyed regarding patient sign-outs at shift change. Data were used to design and implement interventions aimed at improving sign-out quality. This quasi-experimental project incorporated the Plan, Do, Study, Act methodology. Residents completed an anonymous electronic survey regarding experiences during sign-outs. Survey questions assessed structure, process, and outcome of sign-outs. Analysis of qualitative and quantitative data was performed; interventions were implemented based on survey findings. A total of 120 surveys (89% response) and 115 surveys (83% response) were completed by residents of 4 postgraduate years in response to the first (2008) and second (2009) survey requests, respectively. Approximately 79% of the respondents to the second survey indicated that postintervention sign-out systems were superior to preintervention systems. Results indicated improvement in specific areas of structure, process, and outcome. Survey-based modifications to existing sign-out systems effected measurable quality improvement in structure, process, and outcome.
    American Journal of Medical Quality 09/2011; 27(1):39-47. · 1.64 Impact Factor
  • Article: Clinical impact of bortezomib in frontline regimens for patients with multiple myeloma.
    Rami Manochakian, Kena C Miller, Asher A Chanan-Khan
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Standard frontline therapy for multiple myeloma comprises cytoreductive therapy with or without consolidative high-dose therapy plus stem cell transplantation (HDT-SCT). Despite therapeutic advances, the disease remains incurable; most patients relapse following frontline treatment and die within 5 years of diagnosis. New options are required to enhance and prolong response, and improve survival, particularly for elderly patients and those with renal dysfunction. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the ability of bortezomib to enhance the activity of commonly used myeloma agents, an observation validated through clinical studies in both the relapsed and frontline settings. This review focuses on the growing body of clinical evidence showing the effectiveness of bortezomib and bortezomib-based combinations in newly diagnosed patients, characterized by high overall response rates and consistently high rates of complete response. A number of studies incorporating bortezomib as part of induction therapy have demonstrated no adverse impact of bortezomib on stem cell harvest and engraftment in patients proceeding to transplantation. The higher rates of complete response typically associated with bortezomib treatment may potentially improve clinical outcomes in this setting. Final results from ongoing phase III studies of bortezomib-based combinations versus standard regimens will help define the optimal use of bortezomib as a standard component of frontline therapy for multiple myeloma. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.
    The Oncologist 09/2007; 12(8):978-90. · 3.91 Impact Factor
  • Article: Bortezomib in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many novel agents and new combinations (including bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide) have been developed in recent years for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), creating major shifts in therapeutic management. Achieving complete response (CR)/near CR (nCR) generally serves as a reliable clinical surrogate for overall treatment outcome, ie, prolonged survival. Indeed, some newer induction regimens are yielding similar median time to disease progression effects compared with transplantation. Thus, it can be a dilemma whether a patient with CR/nCR needs to be subjected to the potential morbidity associated with transplantation after induction therapy. Combining new agents with chemotherapy-based regimens appears to offer higher overall response and CR/nCR rates than similar combinations that do not include chemotherapy. We review the preclinical and clinical rationale for combining bortezomib with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of MM. The synergistic interaction in sensitizing each other toward myeloma cells in vitro and their complementary in vivo activities have justified clinical studies. We summarize data for completed and ongoing phase I/II trials of this combination. To date, results have been sufficiently encouraging to initiate an international, multicenter, randomized, phase III trial comparing bortezomib with or without pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. The results of this trial will confirm whether the rationale for combining bortezomib with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is validated by improved clinical outcome, ie, improved time to progression, for patients with MM.
    Clinical Lymphoma & Myeloma 02/2007; 7(4):266-71. · 1.13 Impact Factor

Institutions

  • 2007
    • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
      • Department of Medicine
      Buffalo, NY, USA