Publications (2)4.89 Total impact
-
Article: Impact of end-stage renal disease care in planned dialysis start and type of renal replacement therapy--a Spanish multicentre experience.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Timely referral, preparation and initiation of dialysis remain problematic issues. The purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of chronic renal disease care and education on the mode of dialysis start (planned vs non-planned) and on the modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT). A total of 1504 patients from 35 hospitals started RRT in 2003. Out-patient, scheduled initiation of dialysis with a permanent vascular or peritoneal access was considered planned. About 46% of the patients started non-planned dialysis. Of all the patients, 75% had > or =3 months of nephrological follow-up, but nearly half were never educated on dialysis options. Haemodialysis (HD) occurred in 82% and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in 18%. Planned starts were associated (all P < 0.001) with many factors: younger age, longer renal and pre-dialysis follow-up, more education on RRT and general care, more medical visits, more PD (27 vs 8%), more follow-up by specific end-stage renal disease (ESRD) units, more permanent access and better biochemical status at the start of dialysis. Some global differences were found between patients: planned vs non-planned with > or =3 months of follow-up, vs non-planned <3 months follow-up or acute non-planned and <3 months of follow-up or acute patients. HD occurred in a similar rate (92%) in patients with non-planned start, no previous follow-up or who were never educated in dialysis modality options. Although a high prevalence of nephrologic care and follow-up was provided among incident patients in dialysis, nearly half the patients did not have a planned dialysis start nor dialysis modality education. Planned start was associated with better analytical and multidisciplinary status. PD was more prevalent in planned starts and when education was given. Specific ESRD units were more likely to provide an optimal care.Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 08/2006; 21 Suppl 2:ii51-5. · 3.40 Impact Factor -
Article: [Prevalence of HIV-1-infection in dialysis units in Spain and potential candidates for renal transplantation: results of a Spanish survey].
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Patients with HIV infection and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have improved their survival in the last few years. HIV infection is not considered a contradiction for renal transplantation, but little experience exists in renal transplantation in HIV infected individuals. There is no information about the prevalence of HIV infection in Spanish patients under renal replacement therapies (RRT). A survey was performed in Spanish dialysis units during 2004. The objective was to study the prevalence and characteristics of HIV infection in patients under RRT in Spain. We also aimed to know how many of them met the Spanish criteria to be included on the renal transplantation waiting list. HIV prevalence was 1.15% (95%CI 0.85-1.45) of 4,962 patients who were under RRT, mostly under hemodialysis and, less commonly, peritoneal dialysis. The most frequent risk factor for HIV infection was parenteral drug use (58%). The most common causes of ESRD were glomerulonephritis (44%). The median time under RRT was 46 months. Coinfections with hepatitis C (60%) and B (7%) were found. Thirty-four percent of patients had a history of aids-defining events. Eighty-six percent were under HAART. The median CD4 cell count was 333 cells/.l and the viral load was undetectable in 68%. Of 40 patients with a completed clinical questionnaire, 9 (22.5%) met the Spanish criteria for renal transplantation. HIV prevalence in patients under RRT in Spain is 1.15% (0.85%-1.45%) and 22.5% percent of these patients met the Spanish criteria to be included on a renal transplantation waiting list.Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 23(6):335-9. · 1.49 Impact Factor
