N F Forbes

Publications (2)9.03 Total impact

• Article: Working memory in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

  N F Forbes, L A Carrick, A M McIntosh, S M Lawrie
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Memory impairment is being recognized increasingly as an important feature of the neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Dysfunction of working memory, a system for the short-term storage and manipulation of information, may relate to a number of core symptoms of schizophrenia. Many studies have examined working memory function in schizophrenia but a clear understanding of the nature and extent of any deficit has been elusive. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing working memory function in subjects with schizophrenia and healthy controls was performed. Following a comprehensive literature search, meta-analyses were conducted on 36 measures of phonological, visuospatial and central executive working memory functioning, encompassing 441 separate results from 187 different studies. Statistically significant effect sizes were found for all working memory measures, indicating deficits in schizophrenia groups. Some of these were robust findings in the absence of evidence of significant heterogeneity or publication bias. Meta-regression analyses showed that the working memory deficit was not simply explained by discrepancies in current IQ between schizophrenia and control groups. Large deficits in working memory were demonstrated in schizophrenia groups across all three working memory domains. There were, however, no clear differences across subdomains or between particular working memory tasks. There was substantial heterogeneity across results that could only be partly explained.
  Psychological Medicine 11/2008; 39(6):889-905. · 6.16 Impact Factor
• Article: Chronic mild stress and sucrose consumption: validity as a model of depression.

  N F Forbes, C A Stewart, K Matthews, I C Reid
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Sucrose consumption and preference were examined in rats subjected to a 6-week regimen of unpredictable mild stressors, after Willner et al. (11). These subjects were compared with groups exposed to: 1. only the food deprivation element of the stress protocol; or 2. the stress protocol without the food deprivation element. A control group was not exposed to stressors. Body weight and sucrose consumption were significantly reduced in stressed and food-deprived animals compared to the other 2 groups. These variables therefore appeared dependent on food deprivation and independent of other elements of the stress protocol. Neither sucrose consumption per gram body weight nor sucrose preference differed significantly among the 4 groups. These results indicate that food deprivation is not only necessary, but sufficient, to produce sucrose consumption deficits in rats. It is, therefore, likely that reduced sucrose consumption in stressed rats results solely from diminished body weight rather than exposure to the series of stressors. We conclude that sucrose consumption is not a valid index of reward responsiveness. Other measures (such as place-preference conditioning or intracranial self-stimulation threshold) should be evaluated also with respect to body weight change when considering the validity of stressor-based models of depressive disorder.
  Physiology & Behavior 01/1997; 60(6):1481-4. · 2.87 Impact Factor