Michaela T Dewar

Publications (2)9.72 Total impact

• Article: Forgetting due to retroactive interference: a fusion of Müller and Pilzecker's (1900) early insights into everyday forgetting and recent research on anterograde amnesia.

  Michaela T Dewar, Nelson Cowan, Sergio Della Sala
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Ebbinghaus' seminal work suggested that forgetting occurred as a function of time. However, it raised a number of fundamental theoretical issues that still have not been resolved in the literature. Müller and Pilzecker (1900) addressed some of these issues in a remarkable manner but their observations have been mostly ignored in recent years. Müller and Pilzecker (1900) showed that the materials and the task that intervene between presentation and recall may interfere with the to-be-remembered items, and they named this phenomenon "retroactive interference" (RI). They further asked whether there is a type of RI that is based only on distraction, and not on the similarity between the memoranda and the interfering stimuli. Their findings, and our follow up research in healthy volunteers and amnesiacs, confirm that forgetting can be induced by any subsequent mentally effortful interpolated task, irrespective of its content; the interpolated "interfering" material does not have to be similar to the to-be-remembered stimuli.
  Cortex 08/2007; 43(5):616-34. · 6.08 Impact Factor
• Source

  Available from: aberdeen.ac.uk

  Article: Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.

  Michaela T Dewar, David P Carey
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Recent findings of visuomotor immunity to perceptual illusions have been attributed to a perception-action division of labour within two anatomically segregated streams in the visual cortex. However, critics argue that such experimental findings are not valid and have suggested that the perception-action dissociations can be explained away by differential attentional/processing demands, rather than a functional dissociation in the neurologically intact brain: perceptual tasks require processing of the entire illusion display while visuomotor tasks only require processing the target that is acted upon. The present study examined whether grasping of the Müller-Lyer display would remain immune to the illusion when the task required the direction of attention or a related resource towards both Müller-Lyer shafts. Twelve participants were required to match and grasp two Müller-Lyer shafts bimanually (i.e. one with each hand). It was found that bimanual grasping was not significantly affected by the illusion, while there was a highly significant illusion effect on perceptual estimation by matching. Furthermore, it was established that this dissociation did not result from a differing baseline rate of change in manual estimation and grasping aperture to a change in physical object size. These findings provide further support for the postulated perception-action dissociation and fail to uphold the idea that grasping 'immunity' to the Müller-Lyer illusions merely represents an experimental artefact.
  Neuropsychologia 02/2006; 44(8):1501-8. · 3.64 Impact Factor