Publications (2)19.41 Total impact
-
Article: Combining low-intensity and maximal exercise test results improves prognostic prediction in chronic heart failure.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study investigated the combination of maximal and low-intensity exercise testing in predicting prognosis in chronic heart failure (CHF), using one single exercise test (two-step protocol). Risk assessment based on any single factor has limited accuracy and reproducibility. Treadmill exercise testing was performed in 202 consecutive CHF patients (174 male; mean age 52 +/- 11 years) using "breath-by-breath" gas exchange monitoring. Oxygen uptake (VO(2)) kinetics were defined as oxygen deficit (DeltaVO(2) x time [rest to steady state] - Sigma VO(2) [rest to steady state]) and mean response time (MRT = oxygen-deficit/DeltaVO(2)). Peak VO(2) (VO(2)max) was defined as the highest VO(2). Mean follow-up was 873 +/- 628 days. The primary end point was cardiac mortality and the need for urgent heart transplantation. Forty-four patients (22%) died and 15 (7%) were urgently transplanted. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, MRT >50 s was the most powerful predictor of the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR] 4.44), followed by predicted VO(2)max <50% (HR 3.50) and resting systolic blood pressure <105 mm Hg (HR 2.49, all p < 0.001). A majority (n = 130 [64%]) had one or none of these risk factors, with a one-year event rate of only 3%. Patients with two risk factors (n = 45 [22%]) were at medium risk (one-year event rate of 33%). Twenty-seven patients (13%) had all three risk factors, with a one-year event rate of 59%. The area under the curve, using the number of risk factors, was 0.86 +/- 0.04 for the primary end point at one year. These results were independent of medication, in particular, beta-blockade. A combination of low-intensity and maximal exercise test results improves assessment of prognosis in patients with CHF.Journal of the American College of Cardiology 08/2003; 42(1):116-22. · 14.16 Impact Factor -
Article: Prolonged oxygen uptake kinetics during low-intensity exercise are related to poor prognosis in patients with mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To investigate the prognostic value of oxygen uptake (O(2)) kinetics during low-intensity exercise in patients with congestive heart failure. Prospective cohort study. Tertiary care center. One hundred forty-six consecutive patients (128 men) with chronic heart failure, followed up for a mean (+/- SD) duration of 25 +/- 15 months. A treadmill exercise test was performed with "breath by breath" gas-exchange monitoring. VO(2) kinetics were defined as the VO(2) deficit (ie, Delta VO(2) x time[rest to steady state] - Sigma VO(2)[rest to steady state]) and mean response time (MRT) [ie, VO(2) deficit/Delta VO(2)]. Cardiac death, urgent cardiac transplantation, and hospitalization due to worsening heart failure were considered as the end points. Thirty patients (21%) died, 11 patients (8%) underwent urgent transplantation, and 32 patients (22%) were hospitalized. In univariate analysis, MRT was the most powerful predictor of survival, survival free of urgent transplantation, and survival free of hospitalization (hazard ratios [HRs] per 10 s, 1.65, 1.72, and 1.61, respectively; all p < 0.0001). The predictive value of MRT exceeded that of peak VO(2) (HR per mL/kg/min, 0.90; p = 0.02, 0.91; p = 0.007, and 0.95; p = 0.08, respectively). In multivariate analysis, MRT (HR per 10 s, 1.73; p = 0.0002), resting systolic BP (HR per 10 mm Hg, 0.65; p = 0.003), and the slope of the ventilatory response to exercise (HR per 10 U, 1.68; p = 0.02) were independent predictors of survival. Our results suggest that VO(2) kinetics are strongly related to outcome in heart failure patients. Since it has several additional advantages over peak exercise testing (eg, less time-consuming, less demanding for the patients, less dependent on motivation, and applicable in patients with limitations other than cardiopulmonary disease), it has the potential to become a prognostic test for the assessment of heart failure patients.Chest 08/2003; 124(2):580-6. · 5.25 Impact Factor
