M Marlina Multani

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

Are you M Marlina Multani?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)5.16 Total impact

  • Article: Dynamic and differential changes in myocardial and plasma endothelin in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The bioactive peptide endothelin modulates left ventricular function by changing afterload, coronary vascular tone, and myocardial contractility. However, whether increased plasma endothelin levels observed in patients during and after coronary revascularization and cardiopulmonary bypass reflect actual myocardial interstitial levels are unknown. A microdialysis probe (outer diameter: 0.77 mm; length: 4 mm) was placed in the left ventricular apical midmyocardium in 20 patients and myocardial interstitial fluid was collected (2.5 microL/min) at baseline and up to 30 minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass. Myocardial interstitial and systemic arterial endothelin were measured by radioimmunoassay. Baseline myocardial interstitial endothelin was over 6-fold higher than plasma (20.11 +/- 2.07 vs 3.19 +/- 0.25 fmol/mL, P < .05). Plasma endothelin increased by 23% +/- 12% at 60 minutes of cardiopulmonary bypass whereas myocardial interstitial endothelin increased by 105% +/- 24%, P < .05), and this change was higher than in the plasma ( P < .05). Although no further change in plasma endothelin occurred during cardiopulmonary bypass, myocardial interstitial levels increased further after crossclamp removal (400% +/- 75%) and remained significantly higher than plasma at separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. The unique findings of this study were 2-fold: First, significant compartmentalization of endothelin exists within the human myocardium. Second, a significantly higher and temporally disparate change in myocardial interstitial endothelin occurs during and after cardiopulmonary bypass when compared with systemic levels. These dynamic changes in myocardial endothelin likely influence coronary vascular tone and contractility.
    Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 04/2005; 129(3):584-90. · 3.41 Impact Factor
  • Article: Effects of adrenomedullin on human myocyte contractile function and beta-adrenergic response.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adrenomedullin has been demonstrated to cause systemic vasodilation, and increased plasma adrenomedullin levels have been observed in cardiovascular disease states such as heart failure. While adrenomedullin receptors have been localized to the myocardium, the effects of adrenomedullin on human myocyte contractility remained unknown. Left ventricular myocytes were isolated from myocardial biopsies of patients (n = 16) undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery with normal left ventricular ejection fractions (51 +/- 1%). A total of 233 left ventricular myocytes were studied by videomicroscopy. Myocyte shortening velocity (microm/s) was measured at baseline and following the addition of either 3 nM, 30 nM, or 60 nM of adrenomedullin. The change in myocyte shortening velocity with increasing concentrations of adrenomedullin was computed. At all concentrations, adrenomedullin reduced myocyte shortening velocity from baseline values (P < 0.05). Next, the potential interaction of adrenomedullin with the beta-adrenergic receptor system was examined using 25 nM isoproterenol. The beta-adrenergic receptor-mediated increase in the myocyte shortening velocity was blunted with adrenomedullin (29 +/- 7 vs 63 +/- 13 microm/s, P < 0.05). These unique findings demonstrate that adrenomedullin reduced contractility in isolated human left ventricular myocytes and exhibited a negative interaction with the beta-adrenergic receptor system. Past studies have shown that adrenomedullin induces nitric oxide synthesis and that nitric oxide can uncouple myocyte metabolism. Thus, while adrenomedullin causes systemic vasodilation, this peptide can also exert a negative contractile effect in human left ventricular myocytes.
    Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 11/2002; 7(4):235-40. · 1.75 Impact Factor