Are you Luciano Guandalini?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)4.24 Total impact

  • Article: Comparative study of different tendon grasping techniques for arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One cause of early failure of rotator cuff repairs is the pull out of the suture through the tendon. The aims of this study were to investigate the initial strength and failure mode of different tendon grasping techniques and to evaluate an alternative stitch proposed for arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tendons. Four different stitches were investigated: simple stitch, Mattress, modified Mason-Allen and simple stitch closed over a horizontal loop. The last stitch was proposed as an alternative to the modified Mason-Allen stitch since the former is simpler to sew arthroscopically than the latter. The experimental procedure was designed to assess the mechanical behaviour of the stitches. Tests were performed using sheep infraspinatus tendons. Two different non-absorbable sutures were used. Each specimen was preloaded with about 30 N and then loaded to failure. No significant difference was found in compliance among the four investigated stitches. Conversely, the tensile strength of the simple stitch and Mattress was lower than the tensile strength of the other two stitches, while no significant difference was observed between the modified Mason-Allen and the simple stitch closed over a horizontal loop. The maximum grasping power of these two 'reinforced' stitches was achieved only with the high-strength suture. The simple stitch closed over a horizontal loop seems to be an attractive alternative to the modified Mason-Allen for arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff and it seems recommendable instead of simple or Mattress stitches. The use of a high-strength suture would increase the tensile strength of the grasping in the case of good quality tendon tissue.
    Clinical Biomechanics 11/2006; 21(8):799-803. · 2.07 Impact Factor
  • Article: Mechanical effects of the use of vancomycin and meropenem in acrylic bone cement.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The increasing resistance of certain bacteria to antibiotics commonly used in bone cements has led to a demand for alternative antibacterial agents. The antibiotics added to bone cements may, however, have detrimental effects on the mechanical properties of the cement. We evaluated the mechanical effects of adding vancomycin and meropenem to bone cement by compression, bending and fatigue tests. Addition of vancomycin at a concentration of up to 2.5% (w/w) had no effect on the compressive strength. Bending and fatigue strength were negatively affected by vancomycin but not by meropenem. A cement containing 1.25% vancomycin and 1.25% meropenem might be an interesting compromise between the introduction of antibacterial properties and preservation of the mechanical properties. With this concentration of additives the compressive strength and the fatigue strength remain unchanged, while the bending strength (-14%) and the bending modulus (-9%) are only slightly reduced and remain above the limits set by the ISO5833 standard.
    Acta Orthopaedica 09/2006; 77(4):617-21. · 2.17 Impact Factor