Are you James Trow?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)3.1 Total impact

  • Article: Managing Input Data Uncertainty within Strategic Noise Mapping by Utilising Data Schema Specifications.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the proclamation of the Directive on Environmental Noise (200249), the process of noise mapping and action planning has begun around Europe. Large scale wide area noise modelling requires an extensive range of data inputs. The requirements for these inputs are driven by several factors, including the noise calculation methodologies, noise mapping software system, GIS and the deliverables set out within the Directive and recommended Reporting Mechanism. Utilising a staged approach to project design led to the development of detailed noise mapping data schema specifications prior to the collation of input datasets for the calculation process. The data schema may be used throughout the mapping project as a framework to manage dataset concatenation, data capture or the use of defaults and GPGv2 Toolkits to infill data gaps. They also enable data pre-processing guidelines to be passed to non-acoustic GIS specialists, and help to guide and catalogue data processing steps. This paper presents experience gained whilst developing a number of noise mapping data schema specifications and their implementation within successful projects during the first round of mapping. Railway noise mapping is used as an example of how a data schema may be used to develop solutions to technical problems as well as coordinate data capture.
    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 06/2008; 123(5):3263. · 1.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Managing risk by utilising an integrated approach to quality assurance during strategic noise mapping.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the proclamation of the Directive on Environmental Noise (200249), the process of noise mapping and action planning has begun around Europe. As the development of strategic noise maps is arguably a new experience for many end-users, the first round of noise mapping could potentially lead to uncertainties within many aspects of the process. Noise maps represent a baseline for the implementation of noise management systems and any systematic errors within the noise maps could reduce the effective implementation of the whole management system. The extensive range of data inputs required in strategic noise mapping are usually obtained from different data sources or base datasets and as such, cataloguing with the use of metadata is key. The implementation of a quality assurance system is imperative to maintain consistency between technicians and within multi-disciplinary teams. It is also essential to ensure the control of processes and the ability to review inputs, intermediaries and deliverables. A similar approach may also be applied to calculation and post processing of noise levels. This paper presents collective experience of the implementation of quality assurance procedures used in several EU countries during the successful completion of projects within the first round of mapping.
    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 06/2008; 123(5):3135. · 1.55 Impact Factor