Publications (2)5.5 Total impact
-
Article: Value of an individual liver biopsy in the preoperative evaluation of apparently healthy potential liver donors.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Living donor liver transplantation has acquired widespread acceptance. A thorough workup of the potential living donor is guided by 2 objectives: the first is ensuring the safety of the surgical procedure for the donor, and the second is identifying donor grafts that pose potential risks for the recipient. Of 305 living-related liver donors, liver biopsy was performed in 201. The results of those patients' liver function tests and serologic tests were within normal limits. Forty-one of the 201 patients had steatosis on abdominal ultrasonography or tomography. Of 201 liver biopsies, 94 (46.8%) demonstrated normal findings, whereas 107 (53.2%) showed abnormal findings on pathology. Of 107 patients with abnormal pathological findings, 32 (29.9%) had fatty changes, 4 (3.7%) had steatohepatitis, and 71 (66.4%) had nonsteatotic histologic findings including fibrosis, hepatitis, and granulomatous reactions. In conclusion, our data show that half of the living-related liver donors, appearing absolutely healthy, had biopsies with abnormal pathology results. As it is well known that increasing percentages of steatosis may reduce the functional mass of the graft and occult liver diseases may not be detected without liver biopsy, we recommend that liver biopsies be part of the routine evaluation protocol for living-related liver donors in all transplantation institutions.Liver Transplantation 05/2008; 14(4):541-6. · 3.39 Impact Factor -
Article: Factors prognostic of survival in patients awaiting liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In this study, we investigated possible independent predictive factors for survival, other than MELD score, in patients with cirrhosis. We reviewed the serum sodium, cholesterol, albumin, and platelet levels of 99 patients with cirrhosis and investigated the possible correlation of these parameters with survival period. We found that 77% and 81% of patients with cirrhosis were hypocholesterolemic and hypoalbuminemic, respectively. We noted that the survival time of 6 months in patients with serum sodium levels <125 mM at the time of admission to the study was 27% less than that in patients with sodium levels >130 mM. Patients with cirrhosis and serum sodium levels >130 mM survived for more than 1 year (95% CI). MELD scores of patients with serum sodium levels >130, between 125 and 129, and <125 mM were 15.8 to 19.9, 19.7 to 23.6, and 23.3 to 27.2, respectively (95% CI). In conclusion, we suggest that although all of these parameters are correlated with survival in patients with cirrhosis, the serum sodium level is the most accurate prognostic factor and a valid tool for predicting survival when considered in combination with the MELD score.Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2007; 52(11):3217-23. · 2.12 Impact Factor
