David C Wrighton

The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, SCT, United Kingdom

Are you David C Wrighton?

Claim your profile

Publications (1)4.38 Total impact

  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) display differences in their sensitivity to the channel blockers Mg(2+) and memantine that are dependent on the identity of the NR2 subunit present in the receptor-channel complex. This study used two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings from Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing recombinant NMDARs to investigate the actions of Mg(2+) and memantine at the two NMDARs displaying the largest differences in sensitivity to these blockers, namely NR1/NR2A and NR1/NR2D NMDARs. In addition, NR2A/2D chimeric subunits have been employed to examine the effects of pore-forming elements and ligand-binding domains (LBD) on the potency of the block produced by each of these inhibitors. Our results show that, as previously documented, NR2D-containing NMDARs are less sensitive to voltage-dependent Mg(2+) block than their NR2A-containing counterparts. The reduced sensitivity is determined by the M1M2M3 membrane-associated regions, as replacing these regions in NR2A subunits with those found in NR2D subunits results in a approximately 10-fold reduction in Mg(2+) potency. Intriguingly, replacing the NR2A LBD with that from NR2D subunits results in a approximately 2-fold increase in Mg(2+) potency. Moreover, when responses mediated by NR1/NR2A NMDARs are evoked by the partial agonist homoquinolinate, rather than glutamate, Mg(2+) also displays an increased potency. Memantine block of glutamate-evoked currents is most potent at NR1/NR2D NMDARs, but no differences are observed in its ability to inhibit NR2A-containing or NR2A/2D chimeric NMDARs. We suggest that the potency of block of NMDARs by Mg(2+) is influenced not only by pore-forming regions but also the LBD and the resulting conformational changes that occur following agonist binding.
    The Journal of Physiology 02/2008; 586(1):211-25. · 4.38 Impact Factor

Publication Stats

20 Citations
1 Download
50 Views
4.38 Total Impact Points

Top Journals

Institutions

  • 2008
    • The University of Edinburgh
      • Research Centre for Social Sciences
      Edinburgh, SCT, United Kingdom