Cornelis J Van Groeningen

VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Are you Cornelis J Van Groeningen?

Claim your profile

Publications (5)18.1 Total impact

  • Source
    Article: Tonsillar metastasis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the literature less than 100 cases of metastatic carcinoma of the palatine tonsil have been reported. Tonsillar metastasis of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus has not been reported previously. We report a case of a 57-year-old male with a primary adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus with a metastasis in the right palatine tonsil. Metastatic tumour involving the palatine tonsil is rare. The route of dissemination remains unclear. Hypothetically the dissemination of tumour cells could be lymphogenic or secondary by transportation due to vomiting or at the time of endoscopy, but most likely represents haematogenous spread.
    Archiv für Klinische und Experimentelle Ohren- Nasen- und Kehlkopfheilkunde 02/2008; 265(1):127-9. · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Article: The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of S-1 after single oral administration to patients with solid tumors.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose is to determine the effect of food on the bioavailability of S-1, an oral formulation of the 5-fluorouracil (5FU) prodrug Ftorafur (FT), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor, and oxonic acid (an inhibitor of 5FU phosphoribosylation in normal gut mucosa) in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. Eighteen patients received a single dose of S-1 of 35 mg/m(2) with (535-885 kcal) or without food in a crossover study design: in arm A without breakfast on day -7 and with breakfast on day 0 and in arm B the reversed sequence. Blood samples were taken before and after S-1 administration. This food effect was evaluated according to the Food and Drug Administration guidelines using log-transformed data. Pharmacokinetic parameters for 5FU without breakfast were as follows: Tmax, 107 min; Cmax, 1.60 microm; area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) 441 microm x min; and T(1/2), 104 min. Fasting decreased Tmax of FT, 5FU, CDHP, and oxonic acid significantly (P < 0.006) and increased the Cmax (P < 0.013). The food/fast ratio for the AUC of FT was not different, which for 5FU was 0.84 (P = 0.041), for CDHP was 0.89 (P = 0.191), for oxonic acid was 0.48 (P < 0.0005), and for cyanuric acid, the breakdown product of oxonic acid, was 5.1 (P = 0.019). Accumulation of uracil, indicative for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibition, was not affected, as well as the T(1/2) of FT, 5FU, CDHP, and oxonic acid. Evaluation of the log-transformed data demonstrated that the 90% confidence interval for the food/fast ratio for the Cmax and AUC of FT, 5FU, CDHP, and uracil were within 70-143% and 80-125%, respectively, indicating no food effect. Only for oxonic acid and cyanuric acid were these values outside this interval. Food intake affected only the pharmacokinetics of the S-1 constituent oxonic acid but not of FT, CDHP, and 5FU. Because oxonic acid is included to protect against gastrointestinal toxicity, this observation might affect the gastrointestinal toxicity and thus the efficacy of S-1.
    Clinical Cancer Research 06/2004; 10(12 Pt 1):4072-6. · 7.74 Impact Factor
  • Article: Pretreatment deoxycytidine kinase levels predict in vivo gemcitabine sensitivity.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) is essential for the phosphorylation of gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine), a deoxycytidine analogue active against various solid tumors. Cytidine deaminase (CDA) catalyzes the degradation of gemcitabine. We determined whether dCK and/or CDA levels would predict response to gemcitabine. Activities of dCK and CDA were measured in a panel of eight gemcitabine-sensitive and -resistant tumors of a different origin (pancreas, lung, colon, ovary, and head and neck) grown as s.c. tumors in mice. Sensitivity to gemcitabine was expressed as treated versus control (tumor volume treated mice/control mice). Gemcitabine was given on days 0, 3, 6, and 9 (q3dx4) at its maximum tolerated dose. In addition, we measured the mRNA expression and protein levels of dCK in seven human tumor xenografts. dCK activity (mean +/- SE) ranged from 3.3+/-0.3 to 18.4+/-1.2 nmol/h/mg protein. Sensitivity to gemcitabine, expressed as treated versus control, ranged from 0.98 to 0.02, and the activity of CDA varied from 2+/-2 to 411+/-4 nmol/h/mg protein. In contrast to CDA, dCK activity was clearly related to gemcitabine sensitivity (p = -0.93; P < 0.001). This indicates that dCK might be an important prognostic marker for gemcitabine sensitivity. Protein levels were significantly related to both dCK activity (r = 0.96; P < 0.001) and gemcitabine sensitivity (rho = -0.96; P < 0.001). dCK expression as determined by competitive template reverse transcriptase PCR was significantly related with the dCK activity (r = 0.88; P = 0.025) and protein levels (p = 0.80; P = 0.052) but not with gemcitabine sensitivity, suggesting a post-translational regulation of dCK. In conclusion, the clear correlation between dCK levels and gemcitabine sensitivity in various murine tumors and human tumor xenografts may be a prognostic parameter when considering gemcitabine therapy.
    Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 04/2002; 1(6):371-6. · 5.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Lack of effectiveness of combined 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with 5-fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer
    Cornelis J. van Groeningen, Godefridus J. Peters, Herbert M. Pinedo
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Favorable results have been reported for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). In these investigations the highest response rates were obtained in non-pretreated patients. In the present study, 22 patients with primary or acquired resistance to single-agent 5-FU and documented progressive disease on 5-FU were given a bolus injection of LV at a dose of 200 mg/m2, 1 h prior to a 2 h infusion of 5-FU at a dose of 370–770 mg/m2 on 5 consecutive days, and this was repeated every 3 weeks. Whenever possible the dose of 5-FU was escalated to find the maximum tolerable dose. No objective response was observed. Five patients had short-lasting stable disease. Despite 5-FU dose escalation, toxicity was acceptable. One patient developed 5-FU-related angina pectoris with EKG changes. It is concluded that in the schedule used, combined LV/5-FU treatment is ineffective for patients with 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer.
    European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 02/1989;
  • Article: Positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose for response monitoring in locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer; a comparison of different analytical methods.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the ability of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) to monitor response in locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer (LAGEC). Additionally, optimal FDG-PET methods for response monitoring were selected. Sequential dynamic FDG-PET scans were performed in 13 patients with LAGEC (T2-3N0-1M0-1a) treated with neoadjuvant cisplatin and gemcitabine plus granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating growth factor at a three weekly schedule. The standard FDG-PET method, nonlinear regression (NLR), was compared with computed tomography (CT), endoscopic-ultrasound (EUS), and histopathology as well as with 21 simplified analytical FDG-PET methods. Five out of 12 operated tumors responded histopathologically with less than 10% residual tumorcells (42%). These had a higher decrease in FDG uptake compared with nonresponders (P=0.008). Early (after two cycles) and late (after completed induction therapy) response evaluation showed a specificity of 86% and 100%, respectively, and a sensitivity of 100%. Both FDG-PET and EUS were superior to CT. From 21 methods analyzing FDG uptake, the quantitative Patlak analysis, the simplified kinetic method (SKM), and the semiquantitative standardized uptake value corrected for bodyweight (SUV-BW) seemed to correlate best with NLR. FDG-PET reliably predicted response in LAGEC. FDG-PET measurements using Patlak analysis or the more clinical applicable SKM and SUV-BW were acceptable alternatives to NLR.
    Molecular Imaging & Biology 5(5):337-46. · 3.84 Impact Factor