Christine Beanland

University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Are you Christine Beanland?

Claim your profile

Publications (10)16.78 Total impact

  • Source
    Elizabeth Manias · Christine J Beanland · Robin G Riley · Alison M Hutchinson
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Consumer participation in planning and implementing health care is actively encouraged as a means of improving patient outcomes. In assessing the ability of patients to self-medicate, health professionals can identify areas in which patients need assistance, education, and intervention to optimize their health outcomes after discharge. To develop and validate a tool to quantify the ability of patients to administer their regularly scheduled medications while they are hospitalized. Past research enabled us to develop the Self-Administration of Medication (SAM) tool. Using a Delphi technique of 3 rounds, a panel of expert health professionals established the content validity of the tool. For determining level of agreement in using the SAM tool, 56 patients were selected; for each patient, 2 randomly selected nurses completed an assessment. Construct validity and internal consistency were examined by testing the tool in 50 patients and comparing with other validated scales. The 29-item SAM tool had high content validity scores for clarity, representation, and comprehensiveness, with content validity index values ranging from 0.95-1.0. In testing the level of agreement between 2 nurses, out of 43 valid cases, 95.3% of nurses overwhelmingly agreed about the patients' competence to self-administer their drugs. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.819 (95% CI 0.666 to 0.902). Internal consistency for the SAM tool was high, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.899. A moderate to strong correlation was obtained when comparing the SAM tool with other validated measures. The SAM tool is valid and reliable for quantifying patients' ability to manage their regularly scheduled medications in the hospital setting.
    Annals of Pharmacotherapy 07/2006; 40(6):1064-73. DOI:10.1345/aph.1G677 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • Peter Pietrocola · Robin G Riley · Christine J Beanland · Catherine Kelly · Jenny Radnell
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Postoperative back pain is a common, yet under reported, complication of surgery. Previous studies, although small in number, have indicated that the use of a sacral wedge is effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative back pain. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that the intra-operative use of a sacral wedge would decrease the incidence of postoperative back pain in patients undergoing trans-urethral resection of the prostate in lithotomy position. The design of the study was a randomized controlled trial involving the use of a sacral wedge intra-operatively in a male population undergoing trans-urethral resection of the prostate. A total of 236 participants was recruited to the study and allocated to the control or intervention group by block randomization. All patients selected one of three different sized sacral wedges for use during surgery. Data were collected preoperatively, intra-operatively and at postoperative days 2 and 4 and the tools included a structured questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, a visual analogue scale to measure pain intensity and a body map to record its location. Fifty-two per cent of participants reported having a history of back pain and point prevalence on admission to hospital was 27%. Twenty-eight per cent of participants experienced back pain on day 2 postoperatively and this decreased to 14% on day 4. There was no significant difference between the control and intervention groups. The severity of back pain increased after surgery. Postoperatively there were reports of back pain from participants who had not reported a history of back pain before their admission for surgery. In contrast to other studies we found no evidence to support the use of a sacral wedge intra-operatively to reduce the incidence of postoperative back pain. Despite the non-significant results, the high level of postoperative back pain stills draws attention to the need to develop strategies to reduce its incidence.
    Journal of Clinical Nursing 12/2004; 13(8):977-85. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00994.x · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite high levels of breastfeeding initiation in Australia, only 46 percent of women are still breastfeeding (exclusively or partially) 6 months later, with marked differences between social groups. This study aimed to determine the influence of mid-pregnancy breastfeeding education on the proportions of women breastfeeding at hospital discharge, and on the duration of breastfeeding. A randomized controlled trial to compare two strategies for increasing the initiation and duration of breastfeeding was conducted, in which 981 primiparas who attended a public, tertiary women's hospital in Melbourne, Australia, were randomized to one of two interventions or to standard care (327 in each group). The interventions were a 1.5-hour class on practical aspects of breastfeeding using a previously tested tool (Practical Skills), and two 1-hour classes exploring family and community attitudes toward, and experiences of, breastfeeding (Attitudes). Both interventions took place in interactive small groups when women were in mid-pregnancy. Breastfeeding initiation was ascertained by interview 2 to 4 days after birth, and breastfeeding duration was assessed by telephone interview 6 months after birth. Neither intervention increased breastfeeding initiation or duration compared with standard care. Rates at initiation were 97 percent (296/306) for the Practical Skills intervention, 95 percent (291/308) for the Attitudes intervention, and 96 percent (297/310) for standard care. Rates at 6 months were, respectively, 55 percent (162/297), 50 percent (146/293), and 54 percent (162/299). In settings where breastfeeding initiation is already high, neither study intervention could be recommended as an effective strategy to increase breastfeeding initiation or duration.
    Birth 10/2004; 31(3):176-82. DOI:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00302.x · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • Elizabeth Manias · Christine Beanland · Robin Riley · Linda Baker
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Little information is available about patients' perspectives on self- or nurse-related administration of medication. The aim of the study was to determine patients' perspectives about self-medication in the acute care setting. A qualitative approach, using in-depth semi-structured interviews, was taken. Ten patients with a chronic medical illness who had experienced multiple hospital admissions for treatment were interviewed about their experiences of medication administration in the acute care setting. Participants were recruited from two cardiovascular wards in a private, not-for-profit hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Data collection occurred between August and September 2002. Four major themes were identified from the interviews: benefits of self-administration, barriers to self-administration, assessing appropriateness of self-administration and timing of medication administration. Seven participants had previously experienced self-administration of medications and six were in favour of this practice in the clinical setting. Nine managed their own medications at home, and one self-administered with some assistance from his family. Participants were very concerned about how nurses' heavily regulated routines affected delivery of medications in hospital and disrupted individualized plans of care maintained in the home setting. In planning and implementing self-administration programmes, it is important to consider patients' views. Medication regimes should be simple and flexible enough to adapt to patients' lifestyles and usual routines. Nurses should also take advantage of opportunities to support and facilitate patient autonomy, to enable more effective management of health care needs when patients return home.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 05/2004; 46(2):194-203. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02979.x · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • Bernice Redley · Christine Beanland
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI) has been used widely over the last two decades for analysing the needs of family members in the intensive care unit. However, it has significant limitations as a needs assessment tool for use with families in the Emergency Department (ED). This paper discusses the methodological challenges encountered during the process of reviewing and adapting this tool for use in the ED. The purpose of this study was to revise and adapt the CCFNI for use with a population of family members of critically ill patients in an Australian Emergency Department. The process of tool revision, adaptation and reconstruction included: critique of the CCFNI; concept definition; item review; content and structure revision; scale revision; and testing with a sample of the target population. Data collection methods were aimed at accessing a vulnerable population, while enhancing response rate and data quality. A sample of 84 relatives of critically ill patients from one Melbourne Metropolitan Emergency Department was used, 73% of whom returned questionnaires. Pilot data were examined with the specific purpose of identifying elements of the tool that required refinement or modification. Methods used for establishing reliability and validity of the revised tool provided satisfactory results. Limitations of this study include inadequate sample size for exploratory factor analysis, and an incomplete response set for some items, which influenced item analysis. The process used for addressing the identified methodological issues in reviewing and adapting the CCFNI for use in the ED provides a framework for adapting an established tool for a specific purpose.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 02/2004; 45(1):95-104. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02865.x · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • Bernice Redley · Christine Beanland · Mari Botti
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Family members are a crucial part of the holistic approach to care in emergency departments. In particular, they are a group who are vulnerable, yet have been overlooked when considering care options. The primary aim of this systematic review was to appraise research relevant to identifying and meeting the needs of family members who accompany a critically ill person into the Emergency Department (ED). The information was intended to inform future research into the care of these people. A quality assessment strategy was specifically developed to evaluate the various research designs used. The outcomes of the highest quality studies were used to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to inform clinicians caring for family members who accompany a critically ill person into the ED. Recommendations for family care drawn from this review provide the foundation for more rigorous methodologies in future research into this topic. Key findings concern family needs for communication, proximity, support, comfort, assurance and to locate meaning in the event. The review has revealed current knowledge about the care of family members who accompany a critically ill person into the ED that provides guidelines for practice. Despite significant limitations, the knowledge can lead to recommendation to guide and inform future intervention research.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 11/2003; 44(1):88-98. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02771.x · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Sally Wellard · Jennifer Lillibridge · Christine Beanland · Michele Lewis
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Consumer partnerships have been embraced as an important component of building high quality health care services. While nurses have the greatest contact with clients in hospital, little is known of their views about consumer participation or how they facilitate that participation at the bedside. Using focus group interviews and participant observation methods, this project explored nurses' approaches to working with consumers to support their participation in health care delivery. Findings indicate a sharp contrast between the ideas that nurses expressed and the actions observed in practice. It was clear from the interviews that nurses had adopted the rhetoric surrounding consumer participation, yet observational data revealed nursing practices that excluded active participation by consumers. Factors influencing nurses' facilitation of consumer participation were identified as the division of nursing labour in the setting, limited communication between nurses and patients and environmental constraints.
    International Journal of Nursing Practice 09/2003; 9(4):255-60. DOI:10.1046/j.1440-172X.2003.00429.x · 0.60 Impact Factor
  • Robin G Riley · Christine J Beanland · Adrian L Polglase
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 09/2003; 18(8):1004-5. DOI:10.1046/j.1440-1746.2003.03101.x · 3.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background It has proven difficult to reach World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations that infants be exclusively breastfed from birth to six months of age [1,2], yet there is limited knowledge about interventions that are effective in increasing breastfeeding initiation and duration. Particularly lacking is evidence about how to maintain breastfeeding rates in countries which already have a high initiation of breastfeeding. This study aims to determine whether mid-pregnancy breastfeeding education, with a focus on either attitudes to breastfeeding or on technical aspects of breastfeeding, has an effect on rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration. Secondary aims of the study are to: explore what factors might affect the duration of breastfeeding and evaluate the interventions from the participant and childbirth facilitator perspectives. Methods/Design A randomised controlled trial (RCT) design will be used. Women having their first baby, and planning to give birth as public patients at the Royal Women's Hospital (RWH), Melbourne, will be approached at 18–20 weeks of pregnancy and invited to participate in the study. Participants will be randomly allocated to a control group or one of two group interventions: a previously designed and trialled tool to teach practical aspects of breastfeeding or an exploration of family attitudes to breastfeeding. The latter was developed and piloted by the investigators in conjunction with the group facilitators, prior to trial commencement. The interventions are planned to take place at 20–25 weeks. Data will be collected by questionnaire at recruitment, at interview in hospital after the birth and by telephone interview six months later. Medical/obstetric outcomes will be obtained from the medical record. The sample size (972) was calculated to identify an increase in breastfeeding initiation from 75 to 85% and an increase from 40 to 50% in breastfeeding at six months.
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 09/2003; 3(1):5. DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-3-5 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Robin Riley · Christine Beanland · Henk Bos
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was designed to establish a shelf life for processed (peracetic acid) flexible colonoscopes and to demonstrate the adequacy of manual cleaning procedures. The study challenges current practice in Australia where endoscopes are routinely reprocessed prior to use if the endoscope has been sitting at least overnight. The design was a simulated study in the clinical environment and involved artificial contamination of a colonoscope, cleaning validation, and a time series analysis after processing with peracetic acid in a Steris System 1 processor and drying with 100% isopropyl alcohol. The main outcome measure was the presence of bacteria in the internal channels of the colonoscope after cleaning and at 24 and 168 hours after processing with peracetic acid. The findings suggest that colonoscopes may be left for up to 1 week before needing to be reprocessed before use, provided all channels are thoroughly reprocessed and dried, resulting in cost savings and reduced wear and tear on the instruments. The findings also demonstrate the impact of providing feedback to staff on a regular basis about the efficacy of their cleaning techniques.
    Gastroenterology Nursing 05/2002; 25(3):114-9. DOI:10.1097/00001610-200205000-00006 · 0.69 Impact Factor

Publication Stats

169 Citations
16.78 Total Impact Points


  • 2004–2006
    • University of Melbourne
      • Department of Nursing
      Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    • Karolinska Institutet
      Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2003–2004
    • Deakin University
      • School of Nursing and Midwifery
      Geelong, Victoria, Australia
  • 2002
    • Cabrini Health Australia
      East Malvern, Victoria, Australia