Publications (2)0 Total impact
Article: [Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate, i.v. zoledronic acid and i.v. generic pamidronate in the management of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer patients: two parallel studies].[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Two parallel cost-effectiveness studies comparing oral ibandronate and i.v. zoledronic acid and generic pamidronate have been performed. Two global economic models were adapted to the Italian National Health Service within the management of metastatic osteolysis in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Total cost was respectively Euro 100 and Euro 418 lower per patient for ibandronate, vs. zoledronic acid and pamidronate in chemotherapy-treated patients, and Euro 337 and Euro 419 lower in patients undergoing hormonal therapy; also, with a small increment in QALYs, ibandronate resulted as the dominant therapeutic option.Recenti progressi in medicina 02/2008; 99(1):27-31.
Article: [Cost analysis of tumor-induced osteolysis treated with intravenous zoledronic acid and pamidronate: a time-motion study].[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A time-motion study was performed by evaluating time and use of medical supply resources in the administration of zoledronic acid and pamidronate as palliative care of tumor-induced osteolysis within the clinical setting of three Italian oncology day-hospital sites. The direct medical costs were similar for both treatments (Euro 226 for zoledronic acid versus Euro 231 for pamidronate). With the exclusion of the pharmacological therapy, most of the difference in costs derives from nurses' labor costs, which is related to the longer infusion time for pamidronate (1 h, 47 min versus 28 min for zoledronic acid).Recenti progressi in medicina 02/2007; 98(1):12-5.