Are you Charles Hagège?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)5.24 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last decade, the development of new therapeutic options has made more patients benefit from antitumoral strategies including several lines of chemotherapy, the aim of which is a long-term control of the disease progression. In such a context of "chronic" management, the choice of tumor response as a single parameter appears restrictive to assess those new therapeutic options. For that reason, we have recently proposed a composite index of relative efficacy including response rate as well as parameters related to tumour stabilization and duration of the response. The objective of this index, published as the In-RATE is to allow the comparison of two treatments a and b as follows: In-RATE a/b = (response rate a/response rate b) x (time to progression a/time to progression b) x (progression rate b/progression rate a). Values significantly higher or less than 1 suggest the superiority, in terms of efficacy, of treatments a or b, respectively. When retrospectively applied to randomised studies, the In-RATE showed that some results and conclusions based on the response rate as a unique endpoint might be reconsidered, and that a significant difference between protocols could be detected in published reports having concluded to statistical equivalence. This paper reviews the rationale and principle of this work, and discusses the potential clinical applications of the In-RATE.
    Bulletin du cancer 12/2008; 95(11):1075-82. · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last decades, the development of new drugs has allowed cancer patients to experience several lines of chemotherapy, the objective of which is a long term stabilization of the tumour. The objectives of this work was to delineate a composite index of relative antitumoural efficacy (In-RATE) of a regimen over another, including response rate (RR), median time to progression (TTP) and progression rate (PR). When considering two treatments a and b, the In-RATE was defined as RRa/RRb x TTPa/TTPb x PRb/PRa. Values significantly superior or inferior to 1 reveal an advantage for treatment a or b, respectively. The applicability of the In-RATE to published randomized trials in four frequent tumour types (colorectal, non-small cell lung, advanced ovarian and metastatic breast cancers) was suggested to more precisely distinguish the effects of different drugs, and sometimes to detect a significant difference when the published data did not conclude to statistical difference.
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 12/2007; 64(2):106-14. · 4.64 Impact Factor