Are you Armand Lucas?

Claim your profile

Publications (6)19.22 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study is a prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation. Forty-seven patients undergoing breast augmentation were studied. They were assessed for pectoralis muscle function, breast sensation, and body image before and after subpectoral breast augmentation with saline implants. The patients were evaluated as follows: Pectoralis function was determined by measuring maximal voluntary isometric force. Sensation was evaluated by two means: vibration and pressure. The patient's body image was assessed using the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. Results indicated a significant change in breast sensation at 3 months postoperatively but not at 6 months. Pectoralis muscle function did not significantly change during the study period. Body image was significantly improved at both postoperative measuring periods. The authors conclude that breast augmentation results in improved body image with negligible effect on muscle or nerve function.
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 03/2004; 113(2):701-7; discussion 708-11. DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000101503.94322.C6 · 2.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Smoking results in impaired wound healing and poor surgical results. In this retrospective study, we compared outcomes in 155 smokers, 76 ex-smokers, and 517 nonsmokers who received postmastectomy breast reconstructions during a 10-year period. Ex-smokers were defined as those who had quit smoking at least 3 weeks before surgery. Transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery was performed significantly less often in smokers (24.5 percent) than in ex-smokers (30.3 percent) or nonsmokers (39.1 percent) (p < 0.001). Tissue expansion followed by implant was performed in 112 smokers (72.3 percent), 50 (65.8 percent) ex-smokers, and 304 nonsmokers (58.8 percent) (p = 0.002). The overall complication rate in smokers was 39.4 percent, compared with 25 percent in ex-smokers and 25.9 percent in nonsmokers, which is statistically significant (p = 0.002). Mastectomy flap necrosis developed in 12 smokers (7.7 percent), 2 ex-smokers (2.6 percent), and 8 nonsmokers (1.5 percent) (p < 0.001). Among patients receiving TR4AM flaps, fat necrosis developed in 10 smokers (26.3 percent), 2 ex-smokers (8.7 percent), and 17 nonsmokers (8.4 percent). Abdominal wall necrosis was more common in smokers (7.9 percent) than in ex-smokers (4.3 percent) or nonsmokers (1.0 percent). In this large series, tissue expansion was performed more often in smokers than was autogenous reconstruction. Complications were significantly more frequent in smokers. Mastectomy flap necrosis was significantly more frequent in smokers, regardless of the type of reconstruction. Breast reconstruction should be done with caution in smokers. Ex-smokers had complication rates similar to those of nonsmokers. Smokers undergoing reconstruction should be strongly urged to stop smoking at least 3 weeks before their surgery.
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 03/2001; 107(2):342-9; discussion 350-1. DOI:10.1097/00006534-200102000-00007 · 2.99 Impact Factor

  • Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 03/2001; 107(2):350-351. · 2.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obesity and specimen weight have both been associated with a higher incidence of complications for patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. However, obesity has been arbitrarily and inconsistently defined, and the degree of obesity has not been considered in these previous studies. Because insurance companies are increasingly demanding weight loss before authorizing surgery, the relationship of obesity and breast size to complications is of great importance. Upon critical review of the literature, a number of fundamental questions remain unanswered. If complications are more frequent in the obese patient, are these complications directly proportional to the degree of obesity? Also, if the patient is required to lose weight before surgery, is weight loss effective in reducing complication rates? In an attempt to clarify these issues, 395 patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty over a 10-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were arbitrarily divided into five groups in which, depending on their degree of relative obesity, they were classified as less than 5 percent, 5 to 10 percent, 10 to 15 percent, 15 to 20 percent, or greater than 20 percent above average body weight. To evaluate the relationship of specimen weight to complications, patients were also arbitrarily divided into five groups according to weight of the breast reduction specimen, which was classified as less than 300 g, 300 to 600 g, 600 to 900 g, 900 to 1200 g, and greater than 1200 g reduction per breast. Complications were then divided into local and systemic and major and minor. When bilateral reductions alone were analyzed (n = 267), there was a statistically significant increase in complication rate in the obese (p = 0.01). However, when the obese population was further subdivided according to their degree of obesity (less than 5 percent, 5 to 10 percent, 10 to 15 percent, 15 to 20 percent, and greater than 20 percent above average body weight), no further correlation was found. However, the relationship between specimen weight per breast and complications was much stronger with a direct correlation existing between increasing specimen weight and the incidence of complications. Although this study has shown that patients who are average body weight have fewer complications than obese patients after breast reduction surgery, it has not shown an increasing incidence of complication with increasing degrees of obesity. The implications of these findings and their relationship for denying patients surgery on the basis of weight alone are discussed in detail.
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 11/2000; 106(5):998-1003. DOI:10.1097/00006534-200010000-00006 · 2.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To analyze the acute effects of postoperative radiation therapy on the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction following modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Twenty-five consecutive patients were treated with postoperative radiation therapy after TRAM flap reconstruction between 1985 and 1999. The radiation records for these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Information regarding treatment techniques, timing, and dose was obtained and correlated with the extent of erythema, desquamation, and the need for treatment break. The median age was 48 years. The median dose of chest wall radiation was 5040 cGy. Additional boost doses were delivered in 13 patients. Twelve patients (48%) developed mild erythema in the treatment field during the course of treatment and 13 patients (52%) developed moderate (40%) or brisk (12%) erythema. Only 10 patients (40%) developed any kind of desquamation; 5 patients (20%) developed dry desquamation and another 5 patients (20%) developed moist desquamation. No patients required a break in the course of treatment because of acute side effects. None of the parameters evaluated (the use of chemotherapy prior to radiation, the interval between surgery and radiation, smoking, prior incidence of fat necrosis, the use of bolus during radiation, and the use of a boost) were predictive of an increased incidence of either the extent of erythema or the development of desquamation in the treatment field. Postmastectomy radiation for TRAM flap reconstruction is well tolerated and is not associated with an increased incidence of acute side effects. Radiation technique and the use of preradiation chemotherapy do not appear to be correlated with an increased incidence of acute side effects.
    International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics 08/2000; 47(5):1185-90. DOI:10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00589-7 · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • Frank A. Papay · Armand Lucas · Denise Hutton ·

    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 06/1997; 99(6):1787-8. DOI:10.1097/00006534-199705000-00059 · 2.99 Impact Factor