Alima S Ali

University of Oxford, Oxford, ENG, United Kingdom

Are you Alima S Ali?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)14.17 Total impact

  • Article: Vestibular-evoked muscle responses in patients with spinal cord injury.
    J F Iles, Alima S Ali, Gordana Savic
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The vestibular system was activated by galvanic electrical stimulation in 22 patients with spinal cord injury. Three patients were studied standing and all were studied sitting. Electromyographic responses recorded in soleus (standing patients) and the erectores spinae (all patients) were compared with data from 18 control subjects. The vestibular stimulus polarity and head position were arranged so as to produce excitatory medium latency muscle responses in the controls. Responses in the patient group were present bilaterally, present unilaterally or absent below the level of injury. The amplitude of response recorded in erectores spinae at lumbar levels below the lesion in 21 patients (left and right side responses summed) and five control subjects was positively correlated with American Spinal Injuries Association (ASIA) grade: the smallest amplitudes were found in patients with the most severe impairment (Spearman rank correlation coefficient rs = 0.59; P = 0.002, two-tailed). The latency of response (averaged for both sides) was negatively correlated with ASIA grade in 21 patients: the longest latencies were found in patients with the most severe impairment (rs = -0.57; P < 0.01, two-tailed). Amplitude and latency were negatively correlated (rs = -0.72, P < 0.002, two-tailed). The latencies of responses recorded in the erectores spinae at different vertebral levels were linearly related to the vertical distance from the inion to the recording site in both patient and control groups. The conduction velocities of the spinal pathways activated by vestibular stimulation were 4.6 and 10.4 m/s in patient (recording below lesion) and control groups, respectively. Both clinical status (patients recording below lesion, patients recording above lesion and controls) and distance were significant predictors of latency (general linear model, P < 0.0005). It is concluded that measurement of vestibular-evoked responses could provide information on the level and density of spinal cord lesions.
    Brain 08/2004; 127(Pt 7):1584-92. · 9.46 Impact Factor
  • Article: Vestibular actions on back and lower limb muscles during postural tasks in man.
    Alima S Ali, Katherine A Rowen, J F Iles
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The vestibular system was activated by galvanic electrical stimulation in 19 normal subjects. With the head turned to one side so that the stimulating anode was on the posterior mastoid process, stimulation caused standing subjects to sway backwards in the sagittal plane. Electromyography showed bilateral activation of erector spinae, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, soleus and intrinsic foot (toe flexor) muscles. When head direction or electrode polarity was reversed so that the anode was anterior, all those muscles became less active and the subjects swayed forwards. With the head facing forward, stimulation caused sideways sway in the coronal plane, towards the anode, with excitation of the erector spinae on the anode side and reduced activity on the cathode side. The limb muscles were activated on the side opposite the anode and showed complex responses on the anode side. Responses were detectable in the erectores spinae muscles in sitting subjects. No responses in limb muscles were detected in the sitting posture. Subject responses in erector spinae recorded at L3/L4 had latencies from 59 to 110 ms, using a 2 mA stimulus. Latencies in lower limb muscles were longer. The results suggest a role for the vestibular system and descending brain stem motor pathways to the erectores spinae muscles in the control of postural orientation of the back when sitting and standing. The conduction velocity in the motor pathway was estimated to be 13 +/- 10 m s(-1) (mean +/- S.D., n = 12 subjects).
    The Journal of Physiology 02/2003; 546(Pt 2):615-24. · 4.72 Impact Factor

Top Journals

Institutions

  • 2003
    • University of Oxford
      • Department of Zoology
      Oxford, ENG, United Kingdom