-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Vasovagal syncope is the most common cause of syncope, but its risk for driving remains uncertain. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients who had syncope during driving and subsequently underwent the head-up tilt test (HUTT). Of the 245 consecutive patients undergoing HUTT, 23 (9%) had > or =1 episode of syncope during driving. HUTT was positive in 19 (group A) and negative in 4 (group B) patients. No patient had structural heart disease. In group A, the driving incident occurred on the first syncope in 3 patients, and the other 16 patients had 1 to 4 episodes of prior syncope not associated with driving. In group B, the driving incident occurred on the first syncope in 1 patient, and the other 3 patients had prior syncope (3 episodes in each) not associated with driving. Seven group A and 1 group B patients had 2 syncope-related driving incidents, and the remaining patients had only 1 syncope-related driving incident. The syncope-related driving incidents caused personal injury in 7 group A and 2 group B patients. One incident in 1 group A patient caused the death of another driver. After HUTT, all but 1 patient in group A received medical treatment and only 1 patient in group B received empirical beta-blocker therapy. During the follow-up of 51+/-26 months, 1 patient died and another was lost to follow-up. Of the remaining patients, 4 patients had recurrence of syncope and 2 patients had presyncope in group A. One of these patients had another syncope-related driving incident. No group B patient had syncope recurrence. A second etiology of syncope was never found in any patient. We conclude that vasovagal syncope during driving is not uncommon in patients referred for syncope evaluation. Early medical attention to patients with vasovagal syncope may help reduce syncope-related driving incidents.
The American Journal of Cardiology 01/2000; 85(2):184-6. · 3.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We repeated direct-current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation after ibutilide injection in patients who failed conventional cardioversion. Eleven of 12 patients (92%) had successful cardioversion and avoided the need for internal cardioversion.
The American Journal of Cardiology 12/1999; 84(9):1096-8, A10. · 3.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In programming the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), the ventricular tachycardia (VT) detection cycle length (CL) is based on the CL of the documented tachycardia but the ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection CL is set arbitrarily. Appropriate programming of VF detection may not only reduce the incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks for non-VF rhythms but can also avoid the fatal underdetection of VF. The mean VFCL may provide a useful parameter for optimal ICD programming for VF detection if it is reproducible. This study examined the intrapatient reproducibility and interpatient variation of the mean VFCL in 30 ICD patients (25 men and 5 women, mean age 63 +/- 13 years). A total of 210 VF episodes (7 +/- 4 per patient, range 3-17) induced by T-wave shocks (166) or AC (44) at the ICD implant (30 patients) and the predischarge test (12 of 30 patients) were analyzed. The mean VFCL was calculated from the stored V-V intervals in the ICDs. Although the mean VFCL varied significantly from 171 +/- 6 to 263 +/- 11 ms (P < 0.01) among different patients, it was reproducible among different VF episodes in an individual patient (maximal variation 4-50 ms, P > 0.05). The mean VFCL was not significantly different between patients with and without antiarrhythmic drugs (210 +/- 32 vs 210 +/- 23 ms, P > 0.05) and was correlated with the ventricular effective refractory period (r = 0.5, P < 0.05). The mean VFCL varies greatly among different patients but remains reproducible in an individual patient, suggesting that the mean VFCL may serve as a reference for ICD programming of VF detection.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 10/1998; 21(9):1789-94. · 1.35 Impact Factor
-
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 08/1998; 21(7):1470-2. · 1.35 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: AF is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Recognition and appropriate management of AF is important to optimize care of concurrent medical problems and prevent long-term consequences. DC cardioversion under sedation should be performed in patients with pulmonary edema, angina, or hypotension. Ventricular rate control is the first choice in stable patients with rapid ventricular rate. Anticoagulation should be considered in all patients with AF duration < 48 hours, except for those under 65 years old and having no other risk factors of stroke. Recent data imply that early attempts at cardioversion may increase success rates and decrease AF recurrence rates. Thus, transesophageal echocardiogram-guided early cardioversion may become more widely used.
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 06/1998; 16(2):389-403. · 0.86 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Infection and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks are important contributing factors to discontinuation of cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in non-terminally ill patients. These patients are at a high risk of sudden cardiac death despite continued antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
The American Journal of Cardiology 06/1998; 81(10):1203-5. · 3.37 Impact Factor
-
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 02/1997; 20(1 Pt 1):122-4. · 1.35 Impact Factor
