Publications (2)4.43 Total impact
-
Article: CT of pelvic extraperitoneal spaces: an anatomical study in cadavers.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the pelvic extraperitoneal compartments and communications with abdominal retroperitoneal spaces. Helical computed tomography (CT) was used to image the abdomen and pelvis after injection of 800 ml of dilute (1 in 25) contrast material into prevesical, perivesical and perirectal spaces in eight embalmed cadavers. Axial images and multiplanar reconstructions were reviewed to determine flow pathways. The prevesical space was injected in four cadavers, the perivesical space in two and the perirectal in two. After the four prevesical space injections, communication was seen with the perivesical (four of four), perirectal (one of four) and abdominal extraperitoneal spaces (posterior pararenal space in all, anterior pararenal space in two of four, and perirenal space in three of four). After the two perivesical injections, communication was seen with the prevesical (two of two), perirectal (two of two) and abdominal extraperitoneal spaces (posterior pararenal in two of two, anterior pararenal in two of two, and perirenal space in two of two). After the two perirectal space injections, communication was seen with the prevesical (two of two), perivesical (one of two) and abdominal extraperitoneal spaces (posterior pararenal in two of two, anterior pararenal in two of two, and perirenal space in one of two). The extraperitoneal spaces of the pelvis comprise three communicating compartments: the prevesical space, the perivesical space, and the perirectal space. The perirectal space, previously thought to be separate, communicates with the perivesical and the prevesical spaces. Intercommunication occurs both between the pelvic extraperitoneal spaces and with abdominal retroperitoneal spaces.Clinical Radiology 05/2007; 62(5):432-8. · 1.95 Impact Factor -
Article: Outcome after musculoskeletal trauma treated in a regional hospital.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Trauma remains the leading cause of death and morbidity in the under-35-year-old population. The majority of reports assessing outcome after trauma emanate from North American Level I trauma centers. We sought to examine outcome after trauma treated in an Irish regional unit. All patients admitted over a 1-year period with an Injury Severity Score > or =9 were evaluated and 61 patients recruited to the study. Demographic data, medical history, and details of the mechanism and pattern of injury and treatment were collected. Patients' functional outcome was assessed using the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), duration of hospital stay, and return to work. Significant residual disability was noted (mean SIP 13.63+/-14.60). Thirty-seven percent of patients had not returned to work despite a mean follow-up of 18.36 months. Factors associated with a poor outcome include increasing age, a blue-collar occupation, lower limb fractures, comorbid conditions, and the presence of complications. Optimizing primary care of the trauma victim may help to minimize consequent morbidity. A small group of patients suffer permanent disability, and vocational retraining opportunities should be made available to them.The Journal of trauma 10/2000; 49(3):461-9. · 2.48 Impact Factor
