Hidehisa Tachiki

Publications (3)13.66 Total impact

• Article: Measurement of Drug Concentration in the Stomach After Intragastric Administration of Drug Solution to Healthy Volunteers: Analysis of Intragastric Fluid Dynamics and Drug Absorption.

  Shinji Yamashita, Makoto Kataoka, Haruki Higashino, Shinji Sakuma, Takashi Sakamoto, Hinako Uchimaru, Hiroshi Tsukikawa, Masanari Shiramoto, Hitoshi Uchiyama, Hidehisa Tachiki, Shin Irie
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To evaluate the time-profile of intragastric fluid volume in humans after intragastric administration of drug solution. METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers were intragastrically administered 150 mL of drug solution containing atenolol (non-absorbable marker) and salicylic acid, then, aliquots of gastric fluid (ca. 2 mL) were sampled for 2 h through the catheter. Rate constants for secretion and emptying of the fluid were obtained by fitting the time-course of atenolol concentration to the simple gastric fluid transit model. Absorption of salicylic acid from the stomach was estimated by comparing its gastric concentration with that of atenolol. RESULTS: Kinetic analysis of atenolol concentration in the stomach indicated a rapid emptying of the fluid with an average half-life of 4.2 min. Steady-state intragastric fluid volume in 8 volunteers was estimated as 4-133 mL with an average of 42 mL. Intragastric concentration (normalized by dose) of salicylic acid was always lower than that of atenolol, showing approximately 40% of salicylic acid was absorbed from the stomach before emptying to the intestine. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided valuable information on intragastric fluid dynamics and gastric drug absorption in humans to establish a better in vitro-in vivo correlation in oral drug absorption.
  Pharmaceutical Research 11/2012; · 4.09 Impact Factor
• Article: A perspective for biowaivers of human bioequivalence studies on the basis of the combination of the ratio of AUC to the dose and the biopharmaceutics classification system.

  Shinji Sakuma, Hidehisa Tachiki, Hitoshi Uchiyama, Yasunobu Fukui, Naohiro Takeuchi, Kazuo Kumamoto, Tomonori Satoh, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Emi Ishii, Yoshiyuki Sakai, Susumu Takeuchi, Masaru Sugita, Shinji Yamashita
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: The ratio of AUC to the dose (AUC/dose) was previously found as a parameter that predicts a risk of bioinequivalence of oral drug products. On the basis of the combination of this parameter and the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS), a perspective for biowaivers of human bioequivalence studies is discussed. Databases of bioequivalence studies using immediate-release solid oral dosage forms were disclosed by 6 Japanese generic pharmaceutical companies, and the number of subjects required for demonstrating bioequivalence between generic and reference products was plotted as a function of AUC/dose for each BCS category. A small variation in the number of subjects was constantly observed in bioequivalence studies using dosage forms containing an identical BCS class 1 or class 3 drug, even though formulations of the generic product differ between companies. The variation was extremely enlarged when the drugs were substituted with BCS class 2 drugs. Rate-determining steps in oral absorption of highly water-soluble BCS class 1 and class 3 drugs are independent of formulations when there is no significant difference in the in vitro dissolution profiles between formulations. The small variation observed for both BCS categories indicates that the number of subjects converges into one value for each drug. Our analysis indicates the appropriateness of biowaiver of bioequivalence studies for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms containing not only BCS class 1 drugs but also class 3 drugs.
  Molecular Pharmaceutics 06/2011; 8(4):1113-9. · 4.78 Impact Factor
• Article: Analysis of risk factors in human bioequivalence study that incur bioinequivalence of oral drug products.

  Shinji Yamashita, Hidehisa Tachiki
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: In the study of human bioequivalence (BE), newly developed oral products sometimes fail to prove BE with a reference product due to the high variability in pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters after oral absorption. In this study, risk factors that incur bioinequivalence in BE study were analyzed by applying the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). Forty-four generic products were selected from a database of BE studies in the past 10 years at Towa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan), and 90% confidence interval (CI) of AUC and C(max) in human BE study for all products were converted into coefficient of variation (CV(90)). Then, the required number of subjects to confirm BE was estimated from the 90% CI in human BE study of new products. It was found that both the permeability of drugs to human intestinal membrane (P(eff)) and the dose number calculated from their water solubility did not correlate well to CV(90) and the estimated subject number in human BE study, suggesting the contribution of other factors to cause the variability in oral drug absorption. As the PK parameter of drugs, the value of AUC/dose was calculated and plotted against CV(90) and the estimated subject number by classifying drugs into 4 BCS classes. For drugs in classes 1 and 3, AUC/dose gave a clear criterion to distinguish the drugs with a high risk of bioinequivalence, where drugs with low AUC/dose showed high CV(90) and large number of subjects. It was suggested that the high metabolic clearance (for class 1 drug) and low oral absorption (for class 3 drug) could be significant factors to incur bioinequivalence in human BE study, although for drugs in classes 2 and 4, clear factors were not defined. Consequently, for drugs in BCS classes 1 and 3, risks in human BE study to incur bioinequivalence could be predicted by calculating the AUC/dose. In the case of generic drugs, since the parameter of AUC/dose is available before initiating human BE study, this finding is expected to promote an efficient and cost-saving strategy for the development of oral drug products.
  Molecular Pharmaceutics 01/2009; 6(1):48-59. · 4.78 Impact Factor