Haldun Soygur

Samsun Training And Research Hospital, Djanik, Samsun, Turkey

Are you Haldun Soygur?

Claim your profile

Publications (7)13.01 Total impact

  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Suffering comes in many ways for patients confronting cancer. One of these is an unspecifiable fear about death, which is an existential issue. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between death anxiety and its correlates in cancer patients. Seventy cancer patients were assessed using SCID-I, Templer's Death Anxiety Scale, the Hospital Anxiety (A) and Depression (D) Scale, the Distress Thermometer, the Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), the Global Assessment of Functioning, and Glock and Stark's Dimensions of Religious Commitment scales, and these assessments were compared between cancer patients with and without death anxiety. Multiple regression analysis was conducted after correlation analysis between death anxiety and sociodemographic and clinical variables. Axis I psychiatric diagnosis, pain scores, and negative believes about what will happen after death were found to be higher in patients having death anxiety than patients not having death anxiety. Also life expectancy was perceived as shortened in patients with death anxiety. Death anxiety was associated with anxiety, depressive symptoms, and beliefs about what will happen after death. In conclusion, death anxiety could not be regarded as a natural consequence of having cancer; it is associated with the unresolved psychological and physical distress.
    Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 05/2012; 30(3):347-58. · 1.04 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of mirtazapine and imipramine on not only the distressing symptoms of cancer patients such as pain, nausea, vomiting, appetite loss, and sleep disturbances but also depressive and anxiety symptoms. Fifty-three patients with cancer who were diagnosed with major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, or adjustment disorder were included. Twenty patients on mirtazapine, 13 patients on imipramine, and 20 patients in the control group without medication were interviewed during three visits (baseline, third week, and sixth week). Pain, nausea, vomiting, appetite loss, and sleep disturbances were evaluated with self-assessment single-symptom scales during each visit. The patients were also asked to complete the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) during each visit. There were no significant differences among the three visits in the mirtazapine, imipramine, or control groups in terms of pain, nausea, vomiting, or appetite loss. For the initial, middle, and late insomnia, only the mirtazapine group showed improvements (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.003). There were also significant differences in the mean total (p = 0.03), anxiety (p = 0.003), and depression (p = 0.025) scores of HADS among the three visits for patients taking mirtazapine. There were no significant differences for HADS scores from the baseline to the end point for patients taking imipramine or control group patients. Our findings suggest that mirtazapine is effective for resolving insomnia as well as anxiety and depressive symptoms in cancer patients. However, more systematic research, such as placebo-controlled studies, is needed.
    Supportive Care Cancer 03/2008; 16(11):1291-8. · 2.65 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quality of life (QOL) has become an important area to address. The most commonly used QOL tool in oncology is the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL measure (EORTC QLQ-C30). The aim of this study is to examine the reliability and validity of this widely used questionnaire in Turkish language. A total of 114 cancer patients were recruited in this study. The internal consistency of the subscales, concurrent validity between EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0 and Short Form-36 (SF-36), the correlations between the subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale-Anxiety (HADS-A), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale-Depression (HADS-D) were also evaluated. Cronbach's alpha-coefficient for multi-item scales ranged from 0.56 to 0.85, with emotional functioning having the highest Cronbach's alpha-coefficient. General health/QOL subscale was correlated significantly with all other subscales. Modest correlations were found between relevant subscales of SF-36 and EORTC QLQ-C30 scales indicating good convergent validity. Although score of emotional functioning subscale was significantly correlated with HADS-A, no correlation was found with HADS-D. The correlations between general health/QOL and HADS-A and HADS-D were significant though Pearson's coefficients were below 0.4. The EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0 is a reliable and valid instrument and suitable for measuring the QOL in cancer patients in Turkey.
    European Journal of Cancer Care 02/2008; 17(1):98-104. · 1.31 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An association or a casual link has been proposed between the neuroendocrinological and neuroimmunological changes attributed to either depression or cancer. This study investigated whether breast cancer patients with and without major depression exhibit plasma interleukin-6 abnormalities and dexamethasone suppression test results. Four groups, each consisting of 30 women (1--healthy women, 2--patients with major depression, 3--breast cancer patients without major depression, 4--breast cancer patients with major depression), were compared to each other. Psychiatric evaluations were made by structured clinical interview for DSM-IV. Severity of depression was measured with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Plasma levels of interleukin-6 were measured. A dexamethasone suppression test was applied. Breast cancer patients with major depression had markedly higher plasma levels of interleukin-6 than the other group. All breast cancer patients with depression had abnormal dexamethasone suppression test results. These findings suggest a hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis activation and plasma levels of interleukin-6 and plasma interleukin-6 elevation and plasma levels if interleukin-6 and plasma levels of post cortisol concentrations. Evidence for a casual link or association of major depression with immune and endocrinological activation needs to be investigated further.
    Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 09/2007; 31(6):1242-7. · 3.55 Impact Factor
  • Haldun Soygúr, Alp Üçok, Derya Iren Akbiyik
    International Journal of Mental Health - INT J MENT HEALTH. 01/2007; 36(3):58-65.
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is not scarce that patients experience various extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) during antidepressant drug therapy. Thus, choice of an antidepressant drug in case of extrapyramidal side effects, at present, is a dilemma. Escitalopram, which is a recently marketed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), has no such reputation. There is just one case reported for tianeptine that induced abnormal involuntary movements/extrapyramidal side effects. We would like to present a case that was successfully managed with bupropion which had developed EPS during 2 different SSRI (sertraline and escitalopram) and tianeptine therapy.
    Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 10/2006; 30(7):1337-9. · 3.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We described a 32-year-old woman with Huntington's disease (HD) who presented with severe chorea, psychosis and cognitive abnormalities. We started risperidone at 2 mg p.o./d and increased to 4 mg p.o./d after six weeks. Psychotic and motor symptoms were markedly improved. Since there was no change in cognitive functions, we added memantine at 5 mg p.o./d and gradually increased the dose to 20 mg p.o/d after five weeks. We continued risperidone and memantine for nearly six months. The patient did not show any progression of cognitive symptoms or motor abnormalities. We did not observe any psychotic symptoms.
    Journal of the National Medical Association 09/2006; 98(8):1353-5. · 0.91 Impact Factor