Fedor Nikulenkov

Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden

Are you Fedor Nikulenkov?

Claim your profile

Publications (3)35.42 Total impact

  • Article: Inhibition of glycolytic enzymes mediated by pharmacologically activated p53: targeting Warburg effect to fight cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unique sensitivity of tumor cells to the inhibition of glycolysis is a good target for anticancer therapy. Here, we demonstrate that the pharmacologically activated tumor suppressor p53 mediates the inhibition of glycolytic enzymes in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. We showed that p53 binds to the promoters of metabolic genes and represses their expression, including glucose transporters SLC2A12 (GLUT12) and SLC2A1 (GLUT1). Furthermore, p53-mediated repression of transcription factors c-Myc and HIF1α, key drivers of ATP-generating pathways in tumors, contributed to ATP production block. Inhibition of c-Myc by p53 mediated the ablation of several glycolytic genes in normoxia, whereas in hypoxia down-regulation of HIF1α contributed to this effect. We identified Sp1 as a transcription cofactor cooperating with p53 in the ablation of metabolic genes. Using different approaches, we demonstrated that glycolysis block contributes to the robust induction of apoptosis by p53 in cancer cells. Taken together, our data suggest that tumor-specific reinstatement of p53 function targets the "Achilles heel" of cancer cells (i.e. their dependence on glycolysis), which could contribute to the tumor-selective killing of cancer cells by pharmacologically activated p53.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 08/2011; 286(48):41600-15. · 4.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Rescue of the apoptotic-inducing function of mutant p53 by small molecule RITA.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Expression of mutant p53 correlates with poor prognosis in many tumors, therefore strategies aimed at reactivation of mutant p53 are likely to provide important benefits for treatment of tumors that are resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We have previously identified and characterized a small molecule RITA which binds p53 and induces a conformational change which prevents the binding of p53 to several inhibitors, including its own destructor MDM2. In this way, RITA rescues the tumor suppression function of wild type p53. Here, we demonstrate that RITA suppressed the growth and induced apoptosis in human tumor cell lines of a diverse origin carrying mutant p53 proteins. RITA restored transcriptional transactivation and transrepression function of several hot spot p53 mutants. The ability of RITA to rescue the activity of different p53 mutants suggests its generic mechanism of action. Thus, RITA is a promising lead for the development of anti-cancer drugs that reactivate the tumor suppressor function of p53 in cancer cells irrespective whether they express mutant or wild type p53.
    Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) 05/2010; 9(9):1847-55. · 5.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Ablation of key oncogenic pathways by RITA-reactivated p53 is required for efficient apoptosis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Targeting "oncogene addiction" is a promising strategy for anticancer therapy. We report a potent inhibition of crucial oncogenes by p53 upon reactivation by small-molecule RITA in vitro and in vivo. RITA-activated p53 unleashes the transcriptional repression of antiapoptotic proteins Mcl-1, Bcl-2, MAP4, and survivin; blocks the Akt pathway on several levels; and downregulates c-Myc, cyclin E, and beta-catenin. p53 ablates c-Myc expression via several mechanisms at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional level. We show that the threshold for p53-mediated transrepression of survival genes is higher than for transactivation of proapoptotic targets. Inhibition of oncogenes by p53 reduces the cell's ability to buffer proapoptotic signals and elicits robust apoptosis. Our study highlights the role of transcriptional repression for p53-mediated tumor suppression.
    Cancer cell 06/2009; 15(5):441-53. · 25.29 Impact Factor