Elizabet Dachs Cabanas

University of Southampton, Southampton, England, United Kingdom

Are you Elizabet Dachs Cabanas?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)15.25 Total impact

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma harbor common chromosomal abnormalities but the prevalence and relative association of aberrations in these diagnostic groups remains controversial. We investigated these aspects in a large series of patients. Chromosome 13 deletion (Delta13), deletion of TP53, ploidy status and immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) translocations were evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (n=189), smoldering multiple myeloma (n=127) and multiple myeloma (n=400). Overall, Delta13 (25%, 34% and 47%), 16q23 deletions (6%, 8% and 21%) and 17p13 deletions (3%, 1% and 10%) were less frequent in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma than in those with multiple myeloma. When distinct genetic groups were considered, no differences in the prevalence of Delta13 were found with t(4;14)(p16;q32) and t(14;16)(q32;q23) among the three diagnostic groups; in contrast Delta13 was rarer in t(11;14)(q13;q32) in patients with monoclonal gammopathy (1/28) and smoldering myeloma (2/13) than in those with multiple myeloma (40%). Similar results were seen for the few t(6;14)(p21;q32) cases: 0/3 patients with monoclonal gammopathy or smoldering myeloma had the Delta13, whereas 4/6 (67%) patients with multiple myeloma and this translocation also had the deletion. In multiple myeloma patients with both an IgH translocation and Delta13, the proportions of cells affected by the two abnormalities were similar, as was the case for t(4;14) and t(14;16) monoclonal gammopathy patients positive for Delta13. In contrast, in monoclonal gammopathy patients with t(14;20)(q32;q11), the translocation was present in almost all cells, while the Delta13 was present in only a sub-population. These results indicate that the presence and time of occurrence of Delta13 depends on the presence of specific concurrent abnormalities. The observation that Delta13 was extremely rare in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma with translocations directly involving cyclin D genes (CCND1 and CCND3) suggest a possible role of Delta13 in the progression of the disease specifically in these genetic sub-groups. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: ISRCTN 68454111; UKCRN ID 1176).
    Haematologica 12/2009; 94(12):1708-13. DOI:10.3324/haematol.2009.011064 · 5.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In myeloma, the prognostic impact of different strategies used to detect chromosome 13 deletion (Delta13) remains controversial. To address this, we compared conventional cytogenetics and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) in a large multicenter study (n=794). The ability to obtain abnormal metaphases was associated with a poor prognosis, which was worse if Delta13, p53 deletion or t(4;14) was present, but only Delta13 remained significant on multivariate analysis. Patients with Delta13, by either cytogenetics or iFISH, had a poor prognosis. However, when cases with Delta13 detectable by both cytogenetics and iFISH were separated from those detected by iFISH only, the poor prognosis of iFISH-detectable Delta13 disappeared; their outcome matched that of patients with no detectable Delta13 (P=0.115). Addition of ploidy status to iFISH-Delta13 did not affect the prognostic value of the test. Indeed both cytogenetics and iFISH Delta13 divided both hyperdiploidy and nonhyperdiploidy into two groups with similar prognoses, indicating that the poor prognosis of ploidy is entirely due to its association with Delta13. We conclude that Delta13 detected by metaphase analysis is a critical prognostic factor in myeloma. Absence of Delta13, even in those patients yielding only normal or no metaphases, is associated with a relatively good prognosis.
    Leukemia 10/2006; 20(9):1610-7. DOI:10.1038/sj.leu.2404304 · 9.38 Impact Factor