Maria Janssen

Universität Heidelberg, Heidelburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

Are you Maria Janssen?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)2.45 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigated the real motives of German non-smokers. In the German SToP ("Sources of Tobacco for Pupils") Study 707 non-smoking pupils were asked to write down their motives for being non-smokers. A total of 1324 partially very elaborate free text statements (mean/range: 1.9/1-7 distinguishable motives) were evaluated in a qualitative content analysis. The most important and frequently mentioned motives for not smoking were health-related arguments (78.1%). Except for cancer significant main health risks of tobacco consumption like cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases or COPD were hardly perceived. Further important reasons were an aesthetic aversion (38.6%), missing perception of a benefit (25.2%), and economic motives (20.8%). Girls and pupils from academic high schools named aesthetic motives significantly more often than boys and pupils from secondary schools respectively. A historical comparison shows that the motive "lacking benefit" reached a higher rank in our study than in the 1990s. When non-smokers are asked directly, extrinsic reasons (restrictions, smoking bans) do not seem to be relevant for them. Reasons concerning health, good physical shape, and beauty should be a central argument in the medical practise with young smokers.
    Health Policy 11/2009; 95(1):36-40. DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.10.007 · 1.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    S Schneider · M Janssen · S Röhrig · M Schüssler · D Solle
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In spite of declining smoking prevalence nothing is known about the motives of adolescents in Germany who abstain from smoking. If one knows what motives prevent youngsters from ever starting to smoke it would make it possible to adjust future preventive strategies that would reach the "hard core" of smoking adolescents. This study investigated the true motives of non-smokers and also focused on possible gender and social background as well as age differences in the structure of their motivation. In the SToP-Study ("Sources of Tobacco for Pupils" Study 2008) 780 pupils, of whom 709 were non-smokers from 32 school classes, grades 7-9, were interviewed about their smoking experience. In anonymized answers to the questions pupils wrote down their motives for being non-smokers. A total of 1,329 free text statements, some of them very elaborate, were categorized and evaluated in a qualitative analysis. The most important and frequently mentioned motives for not smoking were health related (78,1%). But the most significant health risks of tobacco consumption (cardiac and cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), except cancer risk, were hardly appreciated. Other important reasons for not smoking were aesthetic aversion (38.6%), lacking perception of a benefit (25.1%) and economic motives (20.9%). It was especially female grammar school pupils who most frequently expressed health and aesthetic reasons (such as disgust, smell and taste aversion, dental and finger discolorations) as motives for not smoking. Extrinsic reasons (legal restrictions, smoking bans imposed by parents and schools, age limits etc.) are not important reasons to abstain for young non-smokers. Specifically, arguments about health, participation in sports and being in good physical condition should be central to any advice given to young smokers within the setting of general medical practice.
    DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 08/2009; 134(31-32):1573-7. DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1233982 · 0.54 Impact Factor