Francesco Petrocelli

University Hospital San Martino, Genova, Liguria, Italy

Are you Francesco Petrocelli?

Claim your profile

Publications (5)13.63 Total impact

  • Article: Subclavian artery pseudoaneurysm complicating central venous catheterization: Endovascular treatment with amplatzer vascular plug 4 and covered stent.
    Umberto G Rossi, Francesco Petrocelli, Carlo Ferro
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Central venous catheterization is a routine vascular access procedure; however, it may be associated with life-threating complications such as arterial puncture, leading to pseudoaneurysm formation.We report a case of a 41-year-old female that developed an iatrogenic left subclavian pseudoaneurysm complicating the attempt of left internal jugular vein cannulation for temporary haemodialysis therapy. The patient underwent urgent endovascular treatment with deployment of covered stent into the left subclavian artery after embolization of the origin of the left internal mammary artery with Amplatzer Vascular Plug 4. The patient's recovery was unremarkable. Follow-up till 24 months reveals total exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm of the left subclavian artery with patency of the distal branches. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 01/2013; · 2.29 Impact Factor
  • Article: Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia in a dialysis patient with extensive vascular calcification.
    Umberto G Rossi, Francesco Petrocelli, Sara Seitun, Carlo Ferro
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We describe a case of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia in a 37-year-old man with hemodialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease due to diabetes who was admitted to our hospital with abdominal pain. A plain radiograph of the abdomen showed distended loops of small bowel and gas in the hepatic portal vein. Multidetector computed tomography showed massive wall calcification of the superior mesenteric artery and its collaterals, pneumatosis intestinalis of a segment of the jejunum, and porto-mesenteric vein gas. Urgent laparotomy confirmed segmental necrosis of the jejunum, which was resected. Pathologic examination showed whole-layer necrosis of the resected bowel without arterial or venous thrombosis. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia is an increasingly recognized and potentially lethal complication in hemodialysis patients. In the present case, critical factors for the development of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia may have included prolonged hypotension during hemodialysis treatments that reduced blood flow to the small bowel and massive vascular calcification that negatively affected compliance of the superior mesenteric artery and its branches.
    American Journal of Kidney Diseases 07/2012; 60(5):843-6. · 5.43 Impact Factor
  • Article: Recurrent acute Budd-Chiari syndrome after right hepatectomy: US color-Doppler vascular pattern and left hepatic vein stenting for treatment.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: After extended right hepatectomy remnant liver can be affected by outflow obstruction due to torsion of the inferior vena cava or kinking of the left hepatic vein. Remnant liver fixation is therefore suggested to avoid postoperative acute Budd-Chiari syndrome. Despite remnant liver reposition during surgery, a 76-years-old woman developed complete outflow obstruction. This clinical situation, due to left hepatic vein kinking, was suspected by US examination and confirmed by CT scan that showed a pathological intrahepatic vascular pattern. Patient required urgent relaparotomy and the liver was replaced in normal position. However, recurrence of outflow obstruction occurred and it was ultimately treated by inferior vena cava angiogram with left hepatic vein stenting.
    Abdominal Imaging 06/2012; · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • Article: Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the abdominal aorta involving the celiac trunk origin and superior mesenteric artery occlusion: endovascular treatment.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We describe a case of endovascular treatment in a 64-year-old woman affected by a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) of the abdominal aorta with a 26-mm pseudoaneurysm involving the celiac trunk (CT) origin and with superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion in the first 30 mm. The patient underwent stenting to treat the SMA occlusion and subsequent deployment of a custom-designed fenestrated endovascular stent-graft to treat the PAU involving the CT origin. Follow-up at 6 months after device placement demonstrated no complications, and there was complete thrombosis of the PAU and patency of the two branch vessels.
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 02/2011; 34 Suppl 2:S40-3. · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • Article: The Amplatzer vascular plug 4: preliminary experience.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this communication is to describe our preliminary experience with the Amplatzer Vascular Plug 4 (AVP 4) in peripheral vascular embolization. The AVP 4 was used for peripheral vascular embolization in five patients with renal pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), postsurgical peritoneal bleeding (n = 1), posttraumatic gluteal hemorrhage (n = 1), and intercostal pseudoaneurysm (n = 1). Occlusion time was recorded. Patients were followed up clinically and by imaging for 1 month after the procedure. All treated vessels or vascular abnormalities were successfully occluded within 3 min for low-flow circulation and over 8 min for high-flow circulation. At 1-month follow-up, all patients were symptom-free. All deployed devices remained in the original locations and desirable configurations. In conclusion, the AVP 4 seems to be safe and effective for occluding peripheral vessels and vascular abnormalities. Because of its compatibility with 0.038-in. catheters, it can be deployed through a diagnostic catheter following angiography without exchanging a sheath or guiding catheter. Compared with the previous generation of vascular plugs, the AVP 4 allows for faster procedure times and decreased exposure to radiation.
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 11/2009; 33(4):844-8. · 2.09 Impact Factor