-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: AIM: A clear relationship between tongue coating and oral malodour has been observed in many clinical trials. Why or when this coating is formed remains an open question. The aim of this study was to analyse possible factors related to the presence of tongue coating in a population complaining from oral malodour. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were recruited from a halitosis clinic (UZ Leuven). Medical history, dietary and oral hygiene habits were retrieved via a questionnaire. Data were recorded on organoleptic score and level of sulphur compounds in breath, anatomical features of the tongue dorsum, amount of tongue coating (according to three indices: Miyazaki, Winkel and modified Winkel), tongue coating wet weight and salivary flow. The correlation between the presence of tongue coating and a series of parameters was analysed. RESULTS: The level of oral hygiene was the strongest determinant factor for the presence of tongue coating. Smoking, presence of a denture, periodontal status and dietary habits also correlated although less obvious. CONCLUSION: The presence of tongue coating appears to be related to several factors of which oral hygiene is the strongest.
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 10/2012; · 3.00 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of a simple colorimetric chair side test detecting amines in saliva as an adjunct test in the oral malodour diagnosis.
Non-stimulated saliva samples were collected from 100 volunteers with different degrees of oral malodour. The amount of amines detected by the test was estimated clinically (colorimetric test), confirmed semi quantitatively in the laboratory (standard addition method) and consequently compared with (i) the organoleptic score (OLS); (ii) the volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs) levels (OralChroma(™)) and (iii) the amount of amines detected by means of gas chromatography - mass spectroscopy.
The chair side test correlated well (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.46-0.77), with the OLS, the level of VSCs, and the amines determined by using gas chromatography - mass spectroscopy. The results of the new test for patients with and without oral malodour were significantly different (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of this chair side test were similar to those of the VSCs evaluations.
These results support the "fit for purpose" of the new chair side test as adjunctive diagnostic tool for oral malodour.
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 04/2012; 39(7):645-50. · 3.00 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Until now, the application of biogenic amines as bio-markers of oral malodour has been limited because of the complexity of their detection. This study explores the usability of a simple colorimetric reaction detecting amines in saliva as an adjunct test for the diagnosis of oral malodour. The colour reaction caused by a newly discovered enzyme capable of detecting amines in saliva was characterized in vitro. Two colour scales were developed by transforming the colours of selected dilutions of a mixture of cadaverine and putrescine into a 5- and a 10-point pink-colour scale. Afterwards, this new enzymatic test was used to assess the amount of amines in saliva samples of 50 volunteers with different degrees of oral malodour. The enzymatic reaction was shown to be linear towards the concentration of amines and stable over a time of ≥4 h. Colour scores correlated well with organoleptic scores and the volatile sulfur compounds. More importantly differences between patients with and without oral malodour were significant. Based on these results, we conclude that this new enzymatic test, interpreted by means of a simple colour scale, has the potential to be used as an adjunct chair-side test for oral malodour diagnosis.
Journal of Breath Research 08/2011; 5(4):046003. · 2.54 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Measurement of volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) by portable sulphur monitors (Halimeter, OralChroma) is a common practice for diagnosis of oral malodour. In this study, the clinical value of these devices was examined.
Two hundred and eighty patients with bad breath complaints attending a halitosis consultation were enrolled. Organoleptic scores were given by a trained and calibrated judge, before measurement of the VSC levels (Halimeter, OralChroma), to avoid any bias.
Significant correlations were found between the organoleptic assessment, the Halimeter, and the OralChroma (R=0.74 for organoleptic versus Halimeter; 0.66 for organoleptic versus OralChroma; 0.63 for Halimeterversus OralChroma). The sensitivity and specificity (with regard to the organoleptic score) to detect patients with/without oral malodour for the Halimeter were 63% and 98%, respectively, and for the OralChroma 69% and 100% when using the cutoffs suggested by the manufacturer. By lowering these values, sensitivity could be improved without a significant decrease in specificity (both devices).
We concluded that the measurement of the VSC levels can be used as an adjunct to the organoleptic assessment. Thresholds should be revisited in order to improve their clinical utility. These devices can prove the absence of malodour in case of pseudo-halitosis.
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 11/2009; 36(11):964-9. · 3.00 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper was to analyse the aetiology and characteristics of 2000 patients who visited a multidisciplinary bad breath clinic in Leuven, Belgium and to correlate organoleptic ratings with portable device measurements.
The characteristics and aetiology of breath malodour of two thousand consecutive patients who visited a halitosis consultation were explored by means of a standard questionnaire and a clinical examination, including organoleptic scores provided by a trained and calibrated judge, and a portable bad breath detector (Halimeter).
Most patients came without referral and had complaints for several years (mean: 7 years, SD: 8 years). For 76% of the patients, an oral cause was found [tongue coating (43%), gingivitis/periodontitis (11%) or a combination of the two (18%)]. Pseudo-halitosis/halitophobia was diagnosed in 16% of the cases; and ear, nose and throat/extra-oral causes were found in 4% of the patients. Most patients had an organoleptic score <3 and a Halimeter value <240 p.p.b.
Even though it was observed that halitosis has a predominantly oral origin, a multidisciplinary approach remains necessary to identify ear, nose and throat or extra-oral pathologies and/or pseudo-halitosis/halitophobia.
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 10/2009; 36(11):970-5. · 3.00 Impact Factor
