J Smith-Palmer

Publications (2)6.28 Total impact

• Article: Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody treatment in newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes patients: a hypothetical modelling analysis.

  J Smith-Palmer, B H Curtis, K S Boye, G Goodall, S R Pillemer
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Although limited clinical data exist for anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody therapies, it is believed that they may influence glycaemic control, endogenous insulin secretion and hypoglycaemic event rates in individuals newly diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. In the absence of suitable empirical evidence, the objective of this study was to estimate the potential long-term clinical outcomes associated with treatment via a hypothetical modelling analysis. Analyses were performed using a published and validated computer simulation model of diabetes in a hypothetical US cohort based on published literature and expert opinion. The efficacy of anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody treatment was estimated from clinical data and expert opinion and simulations were performed over a 60-year time horizon. The impact on quality of life associated with treatment was also captured via published utility values. Assuming that a treatment course of an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody produced an initial reduction in glycated haemoglobin of -0.8%, and that the effects persisted for up to 5 years, treatment was projected to lead to an increase in undiscounted life expectancy of 0.43 years and an increase in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.36 quality-adjusted life years compared with conventional exogenous insulin. A course of a hypothetical anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody treatment associated with improved glycaemic control and, potentially, the preservation of pancreatic beta-cell function was estimated to lead to improved life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy compared with conventional treatment in patients with newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes.
  Diabetic Medicine 02/2010; 27(2):189-96. · 2.90 Impact Factor
• Article: Evaluation of exenatide vs. insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: cost-effectiveness analysis in the German setting.

  T Mittendorf, J Smith-Palmer, L Timlin, M Happich, G Goodall
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: The objective of this analysis was to determine the cost-effectiveness of exenatide vs. insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycaemic control with oral antidiabetic agents, in the German setting, from a third-party payer perspective. Data from a published randomized controlled trial were used in combination with a published, validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes to project clinical and cost outcomes over a time horizon of 10 years. Cost data were obtained from published literature and expert opinion. Clinical and cost outcomes were discounted at 5% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were performed to establish key drivers and parameters. Treatment with exenatide compared with insulin glargine was projected to be associated with improvements in life expectancy of 0.016 years and quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.280 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), increased lifetime direct medical costs of euro 3854 (euro 22 095 vs. euro 18 242) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of euro 13 746 per QALY. If quality of life was not taken into account, exenatide was associated with an ICER of euro 238 201 per life year gained vs. insulin glargine. Sensitivity analyses revealed that outcomes were most sensitive to changes in assumptions for (dis)utility values relating to weight change and the rate of self-monitored blood glucose testing. Exenatide was projected to be associated with similar clinical outcomes and increased costs compared with insulin glargine. Analysis of cost-effectiveness from a third-party perspective suggests that exenatide is likely to represent good value for money in the German setting.
  Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism 10/2009; 11(11):1068-79. · 3.38 Impact Factor