Xiao Yan Zhang

Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China

Are you Xiao Yan Zhang?

Claim your profile

Publications (5)10.01 Total impact

  • Article: Study on the clinical significance of Argonaute2 expression in colonic carcinoma by tissue microarray.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study the expression levels and clinical significance of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) on colonic carcinomas and normal tissues. Colon tissue samples from 90 cases of colonic carcinomas and 90 normal subjects were accumulated and made into a tissue microarray containing 360 dots. Expression of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) was detected by immunohistochemical staining of the tissue microarray. There was significant difference in the expression levels of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) between colonic carcinomas and normal tissues (P<0.01). However, the expression of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) was not related to sex, age, position, differentiation, lymphatic metastasis and clinical stage of the tumor (P>0.05). Abnormal expression of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) may be correlated with colon tumorigenesis.
    International journal of clinical and experimental pathology 01/2013; 6(3):476-84. · 1.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Association between polymorphism rs6983267 and gastric cancer risk in Chinese population.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To explore the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 8q24 and gastric cancer risk. A case-control investigation including 212 gastric cancer patients and 377 healthy controls was conducted. The genotypes of SNPs (rs6983267, rs7008482 and rs10808555) were examined and established through polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between SNPs and gastric cancer. The genotype frequencies of rs6983267 in gastric cancer patients were obviously different from those in the control (P = 0.005). GT genotype of rs6983267 was associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer compared with GG genotype (adjusted odds ratio = 2.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.28-3.14). Further stratified analysis indicated that rs6983267 GT genotype facilitated the risk of gastric cancer of non-cardiac and intestinal type (OR: 2.638, 95% CI: 1.464-4.753; OR: 1.916, 95% CI: 1.166-3.150, respectively). This study demonstrates for the first time that rs6983267 is involved in susceptibility to gastric cancer, although further large-sample investigations are still needed.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 04/2011; 17(13):1759-65. · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • Article: Initial study of microRNA expression profiles of colonic cancer without lymph node metastasis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the difference of microRNA expression profiles between colonic cancer without lymph node metastasis and the para-cancerous control, to identify the specific microRNA associated with the cancer and to predict the carcinogenetic mechanism of microRNA on the basis of these results. The microRNA (miRNA) were extracted and isolated from six specimens, including colonic cancerous and para-cancerous ones, all of which were confirmed to be without lymph node metastasis. Agilent microRNA microarrays consisting of 723 probes were used for screening the expression differences of microRNA. Data were analyzed using feature extraction software. The expression level of differentially expressed microRNA using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was validated. A total of 14 miRNAs were found to be associated with colonic cancer, in which the expression of miR-106b, miR-135b, miR-18a, miR-18b, miR-196b, miR-19a, miR-224, miR-335, miR-424, miR-20a*, miR-301b and miR-374a were up-regulated and the expression of miR-378 and miR-378* were downregulated in colonic cancer tissues, compared with the para-cancerous control. The expression level of miR-18a and miR-135b were validated in accordance with the results of RT-PCR. The miRNAs are differentially expressed between colonic tumor tissues and para-cancerous tissues. Many of these miRNAs are expected to participate in the process of multiple tumorigenesis. These miRNAs could play an important role in the carcinogenesis of colon. These results provide new insights in human colorectal cancer genesis.
    Journal of Digestive Diseases 02/2010; 11(1):50-4. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Article: MicroRNA expression profile in non-cancerous colonic tissue associated with lymph node metastasis of colon cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify microRNA expression patterns associated with the lymph node metastasis of colon cancer. MicroRNA were isolated from six frozen non-cancerous surrounding colonic tissues derived from stage II-III colon cancer patients with (n = 3) and without (n = 3) lymph node metastasis. We compared the microRNA expression profiles of the six non-cancerous colonic tissues from two colon cancer patient groups; those with confirmed lymph node metastasis, termed the lymph node positive group, and those without detectable lymph node metastasis, termed the lymph node negative group. MicroRNA expression was analyzed with Agilent microarrays containing 723 human microRNA probes. We validated the expression level of differentially expressed microRNA using quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Two microRNA (hsa-miR-129*, hsa-miR-137) were differentially expressed in the lymph node positive group compared with the lymph node negative group. The expression level of hsa-miR-137 was quantified via quantitative real-time PCR analysis for validation. Hsa-miR-137 expression was significantly upregulated nearly 6.6-fold in lymph node positive specimens (P = 0.036). The quantitative real-time PCR result correlates with the microarray finding. The non-cancerous colonic tissues from colon cancer patients with lymph node metastasis have a significantly different microRNA expression profile compared to that from colon cancer patients without lymph node metastasis. The differentially expressed microRNA could have relevance to the lymph node metastasis of colon cancer and may provide a simple profiling method to assist in identifying patients with lymph node metastasis. Besides, these data might offer new ideas for preventing and controlling lymphatic metastasis in colon cancer.
    Journal of Digestive Diseases 09/2009; 10(3):188-94. · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Are polymorphisms of N-acetyltransferase genes susceptible to primary liver cancer in Luoyang, China?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify whether the polymorphisms of the N-acetyltransferase (NAT) genes are susceptible to primary liver cancer (PLC) in Luoyang, a PLC low-incidence area of China. The NAT1 and NAT2 genotypes of 96 PLC cases and 173 controls were determined by PCR-RFLP. Both interaction between NAT1 or NAT2 and environmental risk factors were analyzed based on case control study. Compared to the control group, the frequencies of alleles NAT1*3, NAT1*4, NAT1*10, NAT1*14B and alleles NAT2*4, NAT2*6, NAT2*7 in PLC group showed no statistically significant difference (chi(2) = 2.61 and 4.16, respectively, both P>0.05). The frequencies of NAT1 genotypes NAT1*3/*3, NAT1*3/*4, NAT1*3/*10, NAT1*3/*14B, NAT1*4/*4, NAT1*4/*10, NAT1*4/*14B, NAT1*10/*10, NAT1*10/*14B, and NAT2 genotypes NAT2*4/*4, NAT2*4/*6, NAT2*4/*7, NAT2*6/*6, NAT2*6/*7 and NAT2*7/*7 also had no statistically significant difference between the two groups (chi(2) = 11.86 and 2.94 respectively both, P>0.05). Neither the frequencies of rapid and slow NAT1 acetylators nor the frequencies of rapid and slow NAT2 acetylators were significantly different between the two groups (chi(2) = 0.598 and 0.44, respectively, both P>0.05). The interaction between NAT1*10 and occupational exposures was found significant with an odds ratio of 3.40 (chi(2) = 8.42, P = 0.004, OR 95%CI:1.03-11.22). But no interaction was found between NAT2 and any environmental risk factors. The polymorphisms of NAT1 and NAT2 are not susceptible to PLC in Luoyang. Allele NAT1*10 interacts with occupational exposures.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 04/2005; 11(10):1457-62. · 2.47 Impact Factor