-
Ophelia Q P Yin,
Frank J Giles,
Michele Baccarani,
Philipp le Coutre,
Ovidiu Chiparus, Neil Gallagher,
Giuseppe Saglio,
Timothy P Hughes,
Andreas Hochhaus,
Hagop M Kantarjian,
Richard A Larson
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2 blockers) on the efficacy of nilotinib was evaluated.
Retrospective analyses were performed in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP; N = 492) and in patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant Ph+ CML-CP (N = 256) treated with nilotinib.
In the newly diagnosed population, 87 (17.7 %) and 49 (10.0 %) patients received PPIs and H2 blockers, respectively. Major molecular response at 12 months was achieved by 59 (49.6 %) patients who received at least one PPI or H2 blocker (n = 119) and 153 (41.0 %) patients who did not receive any comedication (n = 373; P = 0.13). PPIs and H2 blockers were used by 77 (30.1 %) and 17 (6.6 %) patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant CML-CP, respectively. Major cytogenetic response by 12 months was achieved by 55 (64.0 %) patients who received at least one PPI or H2 blocker (n = 86) versus 98 (57.6 %) patients who did not receive any comedication (n = 170; P = 0.40); 39 (45.3 %) versus 65 (38.2 %), respectively, achieved complete cytogenetic response by 12 months (P = 0.34). Similar findings were observed in patients who received comedication for >50 % of the time on nilotinib therapy. Nilotinib steady-state trough concentration was not affected by the presence of PPIs or H2 blockers.
Concurrent use of PPIs or H2 blockers did not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of nilotinib in patients with Ph+ CML-CP.
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 05/2012; 70(2):345-50. · 2.83 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Nilotinib is a selective, potent BCR-ABL inhibitor. Previous studies demonstrated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase (CML-CP) or accelerated phase who failed prior imatinib.
This expanded access trial further characterized the safety of nilotinib 400 mg twice daily in patients with CML-CP (N = 1422).
In this large, heavily pretreated population, nilotinib demonstrated significant efficacy, with complete hematologic response and complete cytogenetic response achieved in 43% and 34% of patients, respectively. Responses were rapid, mostly occurring within 6 months, and were higher in patients with suboptimal response to imatinib, with 75% and 50% achieving major cytogenetic response and complete cytogenetic response, respectively. At 18 months, the progression-free survival rate was 80%. Most patients achieved planned dosing of 400 mg twice daily and maintained the dose >12 months. Nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) were mostly mild to moderate and included rash (28%), headache (25%), and nausea (17%). Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (22%), neutropenia (14%), and anemia (3%) were low and managed by dose reduction or brief interruption. Grade 3 or 4 elevations in serum bilirubin and lipase occurred in 4% and 7% of patients, respectively. The incidence of newly occurring AEs decreased over time. Of patients who experienced a dose reduction because of AEs and attempted a re-escalation, 87% successfully achieved re-escalation to the full dose.
This large study confirms that nilotinib was well tolerated and that grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred infrequently and were manageable through transient dose interruptions.
Cancer 07/2011; 118(1):118-26. · 4.77 Impact Factor
-
Giuseppe Saglio,
Dong-Wook Kim,
Surapol Issaragrisil,
Philipp le Coutre,
Gabriel Etienne,
Clarisse Lobo,
Ricardo Pasquini,
Richard E Clark,
Andreas Hochhaus,
Timothy P Hughes, Neil Gallagher,
Albert Hoenekopp,
Mei Dong,
Ariful Haque,
Richard A Larson,
Hagop M Kantarjian
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Nilotinib has been shown to be a more potent inhibitor of BCR-ABL than imatinib. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib, as compared with imatinib, in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase.
In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study, we assigned 846 patients with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nilotinib (at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg twice daily) or imatinib (at a dose of 400 mg once daily). The primary end point was the rate of major molecular response at 12 months.
At 12 months, the rates of major molecular response for nilotinib (44% for the 300-mg dose and 43% for the 400-mg dose) were nearly twice that for imatinib (22%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rates of complete cytogenetic response by 12 months were significantly higher for nilotinib (80% for the 300-mg dose and 78% for the 400-mg dose) than for imatinib (65%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Patients receiving either the 300-mg dose or the 400-mg dose of nilotinib twice daily had a significant improvement in the time to progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis, as compared with those receiving imatinib (P=0.01 and P=0.004, respectively). No patient with progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis had a major molecular response. Gastrointestinal and fluid-retention events were more frequent among patients receiving imatinib, whereas dermatologic events and headache were more frequent in those receiving nilotinib. Discontinuations due to aminotransferase and bilirubin elevations were low in all three study groups.
Nilotinib at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg twice daily was superior to imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00471497.)
New England Journal of Medicine 06/2010; 362(24):2251-9. · 53.30 Impact Factor
-
Timothy Hughes,
Giuseppe Saglio,
Susan Branford,
Simona Soverini,
Dong-Wook Kim,
Martin C Müller,
Giovanni Martinelli,
Jorge Cortes,
Lan Beppu,
Enrico Gottardi,
Dongho Kim,
Philipp Erben,
Yaping Shou,
Ariful Haque, Neil Gallagher,
Jerald Radich,
Andreas Hochhaus
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Nilotinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP; CML-CP) and accelerated phase (AP; CML-AP) who are resistant to or intolerant of prior imatinib therapy. In this subanalysis of a phase II study of nilotinib in patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant CML-CP, the occurrence and impact of baseline and newly detectable BCR-ABL mutations were assessed.
Baseline mutation data were assessed in 281 (88%) of 321 patients with CML-CP in the phase II nilotinib registration trial.
Among imatinib-resistant patients, the frequency of mutations at baseline was 55%. After 12 months of therapy, major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was achieved in 60%, complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in 40%, and major molecular response (MMR) in 29% of patients without baseline mutations versus 49% (P = .145), 32% (P = .285), and 22% (P = .366), respectively, of patients with mutations. Responses in patients who harbored mutations with high in vitro sensitivity to nilotinib (50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50)] <or= 150 nM) or mutations with unknown nilotinib sensitivity were equivalent to those responses for patients without mutations (not significant). Patients with mutations that were less sensitive to nilotinib in vitro (IC(50) > 150 nM; Y253H, E255V/K, F359V/C) had less favorable responses, as 13%, 43%, and 9% of patients with each of these mutations, respectively, achieved MCyR; none achieved CCyR.
For most patients with imatinib resistance and with mutations, nilotinib offers a substantial probability of response. However, mutational status at baseline may influence response. Less sensitive mutations that occurred at three residues defined in this study, as well as the T315I mutation, may be associated with less favorable responses to nilotinib.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 09/2009; 27(25):4204-10. · 18.37 Impact Factor
