W Allan Alexander

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center (AZ, USA), Phoenix, AZ, USA

Are you W Allan Alexander?

Claim your profile

Publications (8)25.76 Total impact

  • Article: Safety and Immunogenicity of Recombinant Human Thrombin: A Pooled Analysis of Results from 10 Clinical Trials.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of recombinant human thrombin (rThrombin), an active topical stand-alone hemostatic agent. DESIGN: Analysis of pooled data from 10 rThrombin clinical trials. PATIENTS: A total of 644 adult and pediatric patients treated with rThrombin; 609 patients were included in the immunogenicity analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In all studies, rThrombin was applied during a single surgical procedure (day 1); the procedures consisted of spinal procedures, major hepatic resection, peripheral arterial bypass, arteriovenous graft formation for hemodialysis access, and synchronous burn wound excision and skin grafting. A dosage of 1000 IU/ml of rThrombin was administered for more than 99% of patients. Adverse events and clinical laboratory values were monitored through day 29. Blood samples were obtained for immunogenicity analyses before the procedure and on day 29. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity for the majority of patients; no patients discontinued from an rThrombin study due to adverse events. The most commonly reported adverse events in the 644 patients were incision site pain (305 patients [47.4%]), procedural pain (215 patients [33.4%]), and nausea (170 patients [26.4%]). Five patients (0.8%) died during the studies; all deaths were considered unrelated to rThrombin treatment. Antibodies to the rThrombin product developed in 5 (0.8%, 95% confidence interval 0.4-2.8%) of 609 patients by day 29, approximately 1 month after treatment; these antibodies did not neutralize the activity of native human thrombin. The development of antibodies did not appear to differ substantively by type of surgical procedure, amount of rThrombin administered, or patient age. CONCLUSION: Recombinant human thrombin was well tolerated, and adverse events were consistent with those reported in the postoperative setting in the surgical populations studied. Approximately 1 month after treatment, less than 1% of the patients had developed antibodies to the rThrombin product, and these antibodies did not neutralize the activity of native human thrombin. These results support the safety of rThrombin when used as a topical aid to hemostasis in numerous surgical settings and for patients of differing ages.
    Pharmacotherapy 10/2012; · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Article: Recombinant human thrombin: safety and immunogenicity in pediatric burn wound excision.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies of recombinant human thrombin (rThrombin) enrolled adult and adolescent patients. This phase 4, open-label, single-group study was conducted in pediatric patients undergoing synchronous burn wound excision and skin grafting to provide information regarding the safety and immunogenicity of rThrombin (primary and secondary endpoints) in this population. Topical rThrombin was applied as a hemostatic aid during a surgical procedure (day 1). Adverse events and clinical laboratory abnormalities were recorded during the study. Immunogenicity samples were collected on days 1 and 29 (study end). Study results were summarized with descriptive statistics. Thirty patients enrolled and 28 completed the study. Mean age was 6.9 years (range, 0.9-17.8 years); 40.0% of patients were girls. Flame and scald were the most common burn types (33.3% each, n = 10/30). Mean graft size was 3.6% total body surface area. Procedural pain (50.0% patients), pruritus (43.3%), and anemia (30.0%) were the most commonly reported adverse events. All adverse events and clinical laboratory abnormalities were considered unrelated to treatment. No patients developed anti-rThrombin product antibodies at day 29. In pediatric patients undergoing burn wound excision and skin grafting, rThrombin was well tolerated and did not lead to the formation of anti-rThrombin product antibodies.
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery 10/2011; 46(10):1992-9. · 1.45 Impact Factor
  • Article: Immunogenicity and safety of re-exposure to recombinant human thrombin in surgical hemostasis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This Phase 4, open-label study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of a second exposure to recombinant human thrombin (rThrombin) in adult patients with previous exposure to rThrombin. Topical rThrombin was applied as a hemostatic aid during a surgical procedure (day 1). Adverse events and clinical laboratory abnormalities were monitored to day 29 (study end). Immunogenicity samples were collected on days 1 and 29. Thirty-one patients were treated at 9 study sites; 30 patients completed the study. Mean age was 59.5 years; 61.3% of patients were male. Study operations types included spinal (n = 23 of 31; 74.2%), arterial reconstruction or peripheral arterial bypass (n = 4; 12.9%), arteriovenous vascular access procedure (n = 3; 9.7%), and other (n = 1; 3.2%). A median of 10 mL rThrombin (1,000 IU/mL; range 5 to 60 mL) was prepared per patient. Median elapsed time since previous rThrombin exposure was 1.3 years (range 19 days to 3.3 years). Recombinant human thrombin was not observed to be immunogenic; no patients (n = 0 of 30, 0%; 95% CI 0.0%, 11.6%) became positive for anti-rThrombin product antibodies at day 29, approximately 1 month after the second exposure to rThrombin. The most commonly reported adverse events were procedural pain (n = 23 of 31, 74.2%), constipation (n = 8, 25.8%), and nausea (n = 8, 25.8%) All adverse events and clinical laboratory abnormalities were considered unrelated to treatment. For the majority of patients, maximal severity of any adverse event was mild or moderate. The immunogenicity and safety results of this Phase 4 rThrombin trial suggest that patients with known previous exposure may be safely re-exposed to topical rThrombin.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 09/2011; 213(6):722-7. · 4.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Persistence of antibodies to the topical hemostat bovine thrombin.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Immunoassays that detect antibovine thrombin product antibodies are not widely available. However, knowing whether these antibodies are present preoperatively would be useful because re-exposure to bovine thrombin-containing products is contraindicated in patients with pre-existing antiproduct antibodies due to the risk of developing immune-mediated coagulopathies. In these exploratory analyses, we characterized one aspect of immune sensitization, the persistence of circulating antibodies after exposure to bovine thrombin product. Elapsed time since a historical surgical procedure with documented or highly likely use of bovine thrombin product was determined for 204 patients enrolled in a recently completed trial. After study completion, baseline samples were assayed for antibovine thrombin product antibodies using validated immunoassays. Antibody data were sorted by time elapsed since the historical procedure. The proportion of patients with antibovine thrombin product antibodies and 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined for each 1-year period, providing an estimate for antibody persistence. Antibovine thrombin product antibodies were detected in 20.7% of patients (23 of 111; 95% CI 14.2%, 29.2%) with ≤1 year since the historical surgical procedure; 6.8% of patients (3 of 44; 95% CI 1.68%, 18.9%) with 1 to <2 years; 16.1% of patients (5 of 31; 95% CI 6.62%, 33.1%) with 2 to <3 years; and 5.6% of patients (1 of 18; 95% CI 0.00%, 27.6%) with ≥3 years since the historical procedure. The proportion of patients with antibovine thrombin product antibodies ranged from 5.6% to 20.7% across the multiyear postoperative window. Clinicians should be aware that antibodies to bovine thrombin products may persist for years after exposure.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 10/2010; 211(6):798-803. · 4.55 Impact Factor
  • Article: Safety and immunogenicity observations pooled from eight clinical trials of recombinant human thrombin.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluated safety and immunogenicity observations pooled from 8 clinical trials of recombinant human thrombin (rThrombin), an active topical hemostatic agent. Recombinant thrombin was applied with an absorbable gelatin sponge or spray applicator during a surgical procedure (day 1). Adverse events and laboratory parameters were monitored until study end (day 29). Immunogenicity was evaluated after study completion on plasma samples collected at baseline and on day 29. Studies included 583 rThrombin-treated patients (median age, 59 years; 54% men). Surgical procedures included: spinal, 33% of patients; hepatic resection, 14%; peripheral arterial bypass, 23%; arteriovenous graft formation for hemodialysis access, 18%; and skin graft after burn wound excision, 12%. Adverse events reported for >or= 10% patients included incision site pain, procedural pain, nausea, constipation, pyrexia, anemia, insomnia, vomiting, and pruritus. Five of 552 patients developed antibodies to rThrombin (0.9%; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.1; day 29); antibodies did not neutralize the biologic activity of native human thrombin. At baseline, 12 patients had pre-existing, antibodies recognizing rThrombin (12 of 552; 2.2%; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.8); these patients had no previous exposure to rThrombin and their antibody titer did not increase >or= 1.0 unit (>or= 10-fold) at day 29. Results from 8 clinical trials collectively demonstrated that rThrombin is well tolerated in numerous surgical settings when used as a topical adjunct to hemostasis. Adverse events and changes in laboratory parameters were consistent with commonly reported postoperative events. Less than 1% of patients developed antibodies to rThrombin; the antibodies did not neutralize native human thrombin.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 02/2010; 210(2):199-204. · 4.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Topical recombinant thrombin at a concentration of 1000 IU/mL reliably shortens in vivo TTH and delivers durable hemostasis in the presence of heparin anticoagulation and clopidogrel platelet inhibition in a rabbit model of vascular bleeding.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of recombinant human thrombin (rThrombin) concentration on time to hemostasis (TTH), clot durability, and clot strength in settings that replicate the heparinization and platelet inhibition often found in surgical populations. A modified, anticoagulated rabbit arteriovenous shunt preparation was selected to model vascular anastomotic bleeding. Rabbits were treated with heparin or heparin + clopidogrel and TTH was measured after applying a range of topical rThrombin concentrations or placebo, in combination with absorbable gelatin sponge, USP. Treatments (placebo, rThrombin) were randomly assigned and the investigator was blinded to treatment. TTH was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method. After hemostasis was achieved, clot burst assessment was performed for heparin + clopidogrel treated animals. Clot viscoelastic strength and kinetics were measured in ex-vivo samples using thromboelastography (TEG) methods. TTH decreased with increasing concentrations of rThrombin in heparin-treated animals and was shorter after treatment with 1000 IU/mL rThrombin (73 seconds) than with 125 IU/mL rThrombin (78 seconds; p = 0.007). TTH also decreased with increasing concentrations of rThrombin in heparin + clopidogrel treated animals; again it was significantly shorter after treatment with 1000 IU/mL rThrombin (71 seconds) than with 125 IU/mL rThrombin (177 seconds; p < 0.001). Variability in TTH was significantly smaller after treatment with 1000 IU/mL rThrombin than after 125 IU/mL rThrombin, indicating greater reliability of clot formation (p < 0.001 for heparin or heparin + clopidogrel treatments). Clot durability was examined in heparin + clopidogrel treated animals. Clots formed in the presence of 1000 IU/mL rThrombin were significantly less likely to rupture during clot burst assessment than those formed in the presence of 125 IU/mL rThrombin (0% versus 79%, p < 0.001). In vitro clot strength and clot kinetics, as determined by TEG in heparin + clopidogrel samples, were positively associated with the amount of rThrombin activity added for clot initiation. In an animal model designed to replicate the anti-coagulation regimens encountered in clinical settings, topical rThrombin at 1000 IU/mL more reliably controlled the pharmacological effects of heparin or heparin + clopidogrel on hemostasis than rThrombin at 125 IU/mL. Results from in vitro assessments confirmed a positive relationship between the amount of rThrombin activity and both the rate of clot formation and clot strength.
    Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research 11/2009; 3:14.
  • Article: A phase 3b, open-label, single-group immunogenicity and safety study of topical recombinant thrombin in surgical hemostasis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The immunogenicity and safety of recombinant human thrombin (rThrombin) were evaluated in this phase 3b, open-label, single-group, multisite study of 209 adult vascular and spinal operation patients at high risk for preexisting anti-bovine thrombin product antibodies. Patients received rThrombin applied as a topical hemostat during a surgical procedure (day 1). Immunogenicity samples were collected at baseline and approximately 1 month after operation (day 29) and were analyzed after study participation. Mean patient age was 61.5 years; median number of previous surgical procedures was 5.0 (range, 1 to 25). Operation types included spinal (n = 89 of 209 [43%]), arterial reconstruction (including peripheral arterial bypass; n = 75 of 209 [36%]), and arteriovenous vascular access procedures (n = 45 of 209 [22%]). All patients had confirmed or highly likely previous bovine thrombin exposure; at baseline, 15.6% of patients (n = 32 of 205) had preexisting anti-bovine thrombin antibodies. Of 200 patients with complete immunogenicity evaluations, 31 had preexisting anti-bovine thrombin antibodies (15.5%), and 4 had preexisting anti-rThrombin product antibodies (2.0%). None of the 200 patients became antibody positive for rThrombin antibodies on day 29 (seroconversion or > or = 10-fold increase in titer). Adverse events and laboratory results were consistent with a surgical population with substantial comorbidities. Patients with preexisting antibodies to bovine thrombin were older (p = 0.04) and had undergone more surgical procedures previously (p < 0.001) than patients without preexisting antibodies. Results of this study confirm the low immunogenicity of rThrombin and suggest that rThrombin can be used safely as an aid to hemostasis in patients with or without preexisting anti-bovine thrombin antibodies. A sizeable proportion of this vascular and spinal operation patient population (15.6%) had preexisting anti-bovine thrombin antibodies; these patients are at risk for immune responses after reexposure to bovine thrombin.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 08/2009; 209(1):68-74. · 4.55 Impact Factor
  • Article: A comparison of recombinant thrombin to bovine thrombin as a hemostatic ancillary in patients undergoing peripheral arterial bypass and arteriovenous graft procedures.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recombinant thrombin (rThrombin) is a potential hemostatic alternative to bovine and human plasma-derived thrombin. This report examines the clinical results for the vascular surgery subgroup of patients enrolled in a larger double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial, which evaluated the comparative safety and efficacy of rThrombin and bovine plasma-derived thrombin (bThrombin) when used as adjuncts to surgical hemostasis. Data from the 164 vascular patients who underwent either a peripheral arterial bypass (PAB) or arteriovenous graft (AV) procedure are included in this analysis. Time to hemostasis at proximal and distal anastomotic sites at 1.5-, 3-, 6-, and 10-minute intervals was determined by procedure (PAB or AV) and overall (PAB + AV). Baseline and day 29 immunologic sera were analyzed. The incidences of postoperative adverse events were compared between treatment groups. Categorical adverse events were evaluated in relation to thrombin product antibody formation. Patients were randomized to either bThrombin (n = 82) or rThrombin (n = 82). Procedures included PAB (n = 88) and AV (n = 76). The bThrombin and rThrombin groups were well matched for demographics and baseline characteristics. A comparable incidence of anastomotic hemostasis was observed in both treatment groups at 10 minutes (94% bThrombin, 91% rThrombin). The incidence of hemostasis was lower at all time points for PAB procedures compared with AV procedures. In the PAB group, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving rThrombin (55%) achieved hemostasis at 3 minutes compared with bThrombin (39%; P < .05). Adverse event profiles and laboratory findings were similar between groups. No patients in the rThrombin group developed anti-rThrombin product antibodies at day 29, whereas 27% of patients in the bThrombin group developed antibodies to bThrombin product (P < .0001). rThrombin or bThrombin used as a hemostatic ancillary for anastomotic bleeding was equally effective at 10 minutes; however, rThrombin compared with bThrombin may provide a more rapid onset of hemostasis at 3 minutes in PAB procedures. Adverse events were similar between the two thrombins. In patients undergoing vascular surgery, both treatments were similarly well tolerated, although rThrombin demonstrated a superior immunogenicity profile.
    Journal of Vascular Surgery 07/2008; 47(6):1266-73. · 3.21 Impact Factor