-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Sleep disturbance is common in depression and is a risk factor for recurrence and suicide. This analysis evaluated the effects of adjunct extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) on sleep disturbance and quality in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and an inadequate response to on-going antidepressant therapy. Pooled data from two 6-wk, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were analysed post hoc. Patients received once-daily quetiapine XR [(150 mg/d), n = 309; (300 mg/d), n = 307] or placebo (n = 303) adjunct to on-going antidepressant therapy. Analyses included: change from randomization in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Item 4 (reduced sleep) score; Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) Items 4 (insomnia-early), 5 (insomnia-middle) and 6 (insomnia-late) scores; HAMD sleep disturbance factor (Items 4+5+6); Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score. Change in MADRS total score was also evaluated in patients stratified by HAMD sleep disturbance factor score (high ⩾4 and low < 4) at randomization. At week 6, adjunct quetiapine XR (150 and 300 mg/d) reduced MADRS Item 4, HAMD Items 4, 5 and 6, HAMD sleep disturbance factor and PSQI global scores from randomization vs. placebo (all p < 0.001). In patients with high sleep disturbance, quetiapine XR (both doses) improved depressive symptoms (MADRS total score) vs. placebo from week 1 onwards (p < 0.01). Adjunct quetiapine XR improved sleep disturbance and quality vs. placebo in patients with MDD and an inadequate response to on-going antidepressant treatment, and was effective against depressive symptoms in patients experiencing high sleep disturbance.
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 05/2013; · 4.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Effects of once-daily extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy on sleep quality and disturbance in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) were evaluated. Pooled data from four 6- or 8-wk placebo-controlled quetiapine XR (50-300 mg/d) monotherapy studies (D1448C00001; D1448C00002; D1448C00003; D1448C00004) were analysed. Primary efficacy end-point was change from randomization in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. Post hoc analyses of secondary end-points were conducted for change from randomization in: MADRS item 4 (reduced sleep); Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) items 4 (insomnia-early), 5 (insomnia-middle), 6 (insomnia-late) and sleep disturbance factor (items 4 + 5+6) scores; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global scores. MADRS total score change was also evaluated in patients experiencing high and low baseline sleep disturbance (HAMD sleep disturbance factor scores ⩾4 and < 4, respectively). In total, 1808 patients were randomized to quetiapine XR or placebo across four studies. At last assessment, quetiapine XR reduced MADRS item 4, HAMD items 4, 5 and 6, HAMD sleep disturbance factor score and PSQI global scores from baseline vs. placebo (p < 0.001). For those experiencing high sleep disturbance (n = 865, quetiapine XR; n = 514, placebo), quetiapine XR improved MADRS total score vs. placebo at all visits (p < 0.001). For those with low sleep disturbance (n = 252, quetiapine XR; n = 121, placebo), quetiapine XR improved MADRS total score vs. placebo at weeks 2 (p < 0.001), 4 and 6 (both p < 0.05). In conclusion, quetiapine XR (50-300 mg/d) monotherapy improved symptoms of sleep disturbance vs. placebo in patients with MDD, including those with either high or low baseline sleep disturbance levels.
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 05/2013; · 4.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are not generally powered to analyze outcomes such as sustained response. We evaluated sustained response rates for patients with major depressive disorder receiving quetiapine XR as monotherapy or adjunct therapy. METHOD: Post hoc analyses of pooled data from four previously reported randomized, placebo-controlled studies of quetiapine XR 150 and 300mg/day as monotherapy or adjunct therapy to ongoing antidepressant. Sustained response rates (≥50% reduction in MADRS total score at specific timepoint and each subsequent visit until Week 6) were calculated at Weeks 1, 2, and 4; rates were compared using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analysis. RESULTS: In the monotherapy studies, the proportion of patients experiencing sustained response was greater with quetiapine XR 150mg/day versus placebo at Week 2 (20.0% vs. 13.3%; p<0.05) and Week 4 (33.3% vs. 23.3%; p<0.01) (observed cases [OC]). The corresponding sustained response rates for quetiapine XR 300mg/day were 18.0% (p=0.104) and 29.7% (p=0.063), respectively (OC). The proportion of patients experiencing sustained response was greater in the adjunct studies versus placebo at Weeks 2 and 4 for quetiapine XR 150 (Week 2, 30.1% vs. 15.2%, p<0.001; Week 4, 40.1% vs. 32.0%, p<0.05) and 300mg/day (Week 2, 29.0% vs. 15.2%, p<0.001; Week 4, 42.0% vs. 32.0%, p<0.05) (OC). LIMITATIONS: Post hoc analyses, acute treatment period; no active comparator. CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine XR as monotherapy (150mg/day at Weeks 2 and 4) or adjunct to ongoing antidepressant therapy (150 and 300mg/day at Weeks 2 and 4) increased sustained response rates versus placebo.
Journal of affective disorders 03/2013; · 3.76 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The efficacy of quetiapine XR was investigated in patients with major depressive disorder and differing levels of baseline severity. Pooled data from four placebo-controlled monotherapy studies of quetiapine XR (50-300 mg/day) were analyzed. Post-hoc analyses were carried out to assess change from baseline in the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at endpoint (week 6 or 8) to week 1, and response (≥50% reduction in MADRS total score) and remission (MADRS total score≤10) rates at endpoint for all patients and six baseline severity cohorts (MADRS total score ≥24, ≥26, ≥28, ≥30, ≥32, and ≥34). In total, 1752 patients (all patients) were evaluated (MADRS score at baseline: ≥24, n=1601; ≥26, n=1467; ≥28, n=1269; ≥30, n=1038; ≥32, n=745; and ≥34, n=500). At endpoint, quetiapine XR reduced MADRS total score in all patients (P<0.001) and each severity cohort (≥24, ≥26, ≥28, ≥30, and ≥32, P<0.001; ≥34, P<0.01) versus placebo. Quetiapine XR also improved MADRS total score at week 1, response rates for each severity cohort, and remission rates in five out of six severity cohorts, versus placebo. Quetiapine XR monotherapy showed antidepressant effects in patients with major depressive disorder across different levels of baseline severity.
International clinical psychopharmacology 03/2013; · 3.35 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:: This study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in elderly patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). DESIGN:: An 11-week (9-week randomized; 2-week posttreatment phase), double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study (D1448C00014). SETTING:: A total of 53 centers in Argentina, Estonia, Finland, Russia, Ukraine, and the United States. PARTICIPANTS:: A total of 338 patients (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition diagnosis of MDD, age ≥66 years, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] total score ≥22, HAM-D Item 1 [depressed mood] score ≥2) were randomized (mean age: 71.3 years). INTERVENTION:: Patients were randomized to quetiapine XR (n = 166; flexible-dosing 50-300 mg/day) or placebo (n = 172). MEASUREMENTS:: Primary outcome was Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score change from randomization at Week 9. RESULTS:: At Week 9, quetiapine XR (least squares [LS] means: -16.33, standard error [SE]: 0.95; mean change: -16.0, standard deviation [SD]: 9.3) significantly reduced MADRS total score from randomization versus placebo (LS means [SE]: -8.79 [0.94]; mean [SD]: -9.0 [9.9]); significant improvements were also seen at Week 1 (LS means [SE]: -4.65 [0.53] versus -2.56 [0.53], respectively; mean [SD]: -4.3 [5.1] versus -2.4 [3.7], respectively). At Week 9, secondary outcome variables significantly improved with quetiapine XR versus placebo, including MADRS response (≥50% reduction in total score); MADRS remission (total score ≤8); HAM-D total, HAM-A total, HAM-A psychic and somatic cluster, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) total scores; proportion of patients with CGI-Improvement score of 2 or less; Q-LES-Q-SF% maximum total, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global, and pain Visual Analog Scale scores. Common adverse events (>10% patients with quetiapine XR) were somnolence, headache, dry mouth, and dizziness. CONCLUSION:: In elderly patients with MDD, quetiapine XR monotherapy (50-300 mg/day, flexibly dosed) is effective at improving depressive symptoms, with symptom improvement observed as early as Week 1. Overall tolerability and safety were consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.
The American journal of geriatric psychiatry: official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry 06/2012; · 3.35 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Prospectively planned pooled analysis evaluating efficacy and tolerability of acute quetiapine XR monotherapy in generalised anxiety disorder.
Data from three 10-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of similar design were analysed.
At Week 8, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total score significantly improved with quetiapine XR: least squares means change -13.31, p < 0.001 (50 mg/day, n = 452), -14.39, p < 0.001 (150 mg/day, n = 673) and -12.50, p < 0.05 (300 mg/day, n = 444) versus -11.30 placebo; significant (p < 0.001, n = 665) improvements versus placebo were observed with each dose at Week 1. Significant improvements versus placebo at Week 8 are as follows: HAM-A psychic symptom subscale, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global scores for all quetiapine XR doses; HAM-A response and remission rates, HAM-A somatic symptom subscale score, Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness total score, % patients with Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score ≤2 with quetiapine XR 50 and 150 mg/day; and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire short form % maximum total score with quetiapine XR 150 mg/day. In the quetiapine XR 50, 150 and 300 mg/day and placebo groups, 13.2%, 16.5%, 24.0% and 5.4% of patients discontinued because of an adverse event, and 1.9%, 1.4%, 3.7% and 1.8% of patients experienced clinically significant changes in glucose. The most common adverse events with quetiapine XR included dry mouth, somnolence, sedation and constipation.
Quetiapine XR monotherapy reduced the symptoms of generalised anxiety disorder, with improvement from Week 1. Adverse events were consistent with the known tolerability profile of quetiapine.
Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental 12/2011; 26(8):614-28. · 2.48 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The main objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). This was a 8 week randomized, 2-week follow-up, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and active-controlled study. Patients were randomized to quetiapine XR 150 (n=219) or 300 mg/day (n=207); escitalopram, 10 mg/day (n=213); or placebo (n=215). The primary endpoint was the change from randomization at week 8 in Hamilton Anxiety Rating (HAM-A) total score. Week 8 mean HAM-A total score was significantly reduced from randomization with quetiapine XR 150 mg/day (-13.9, P<0.001), 300 mg/day (-12.3, P<0.05) and escitalopram (-12.3, P<0.05) versus placebo (-10.7); significant improvements with quetiapine XR (150 and 300 mg/day) versus placebo (P<0.001) were also shown at day 4. At week 8, significant improvements versus placebo were observed in HAM-A psychic [quetiapine XR (both doses) and escitalopram] and somatic (quetiapine XR 150 mg/day and escitalopram) cluster scores and HAM-A response and remission rates (quetiapine XR 150 mg/day). Most common adverse events were dry mouth, somnolence and sedation (quetiapine XR), headache, and nausea (escitalopram). In patients with GAD, quetiapine XR (150 and 300 mg/day) demonstrated significant efficacy at week 8 with symptom improvement as early as day 4. We concluded that quetiapine XR safety and tolerability results were consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.
International clinical psychopharmacology 10/2011; 27(1):40-54. · 3.35 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study evaluated once-daily, extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). This was a 10-week (8-week active treatment/2-week posttreatment drug-discontinuation/tapering phase), double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study (D1448C00009). Primary end point was change from randomization at week 8 in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total score. Overall, 951 patients with GAD were randomized (quetiapine XR: 50 mg/d, n = 234; 150 mg/d, n = 241; 300 mg/d, n = 241; placebo, n = 235). At week 8, HAM-A total scores significantly (P < 0.001) improved versus placebo (-11.10) with quetiapine XR 50 mg/d (-13.31) and 150 mg/d (-13.54), but not 300 mg/d (-11.87; P = 0.240). At week 1, HAM-A total scores significantly improved versus placebo (-5.94) with quetiapine XR 50 mg/d (-7.47; P < 0.01), 150 mg/d (-8.19; P < 0.001), and 300 mg/d (-7.23; P < 0.01). Versus placebo at week 8, quetiapine XR 50 and 150 mg/d significantly improved HAM-A psychic (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively) and somatic (P < 0.001; P < 0.01, respectively) cluster scores, HAM-A response (≥ 50% total score reduction; P < 0.05), and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement categorical changes (P < 0.05). For quetiapine XR 150 mg/d, significant (P < 0.05) improvements were seen for HAM-A remission (total score, ≤ 7) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness scores. For quetiapine XR 300 mg/d, improvements in these secondary variables were not significantly different versus placebo. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global scores improved with all 3 doses (quetiapine: XR 50 mg/d, -4.07 [P < 0.05]; 150 mg/d, -4.38 [P < 0.05]; 300 mg/d, -3.97 [P < 0.05], versus -3.31 with placebo). Adverse events (>10% with quetiapine XR) were dry mouth, somnolence, sedation, dizziness, headache, and fatigue. Quetiapine XR (50/150 mg/d) monotherapy was effective at week 8 in patients with GAD; symptom improvement was seen at week 1 for all doses (50/150/300 mg/d). Safety and tolerability were consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.
Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 06/2011; 31(4):418-28. · 5.09 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Quetiapine is often prescribed at higher than approved doses. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of quetiapine > 800 mg/d.
A trial was carried out from October 2003-September 2005 in 19 referral centers. Patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomized on the basis of persistent symptoms of moderate severity (< 30% improvement in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score after ≥ 4 weeks of quetiapine). The 8 week, double-blind study compared continuation of quetiapine 800 mg/d (n = 43) versus 1,200 mg/d (n = 88). The primary outcome measure was emergent or worsening parkinsonism (Simpson-Angus Scale). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, metabolic side effects, and symptom severity.
Mean doses obtained were 799 mg/d and 1,144 mg/d in the 800-mg/d and > 800-mg/d groups, respectively. Emergent or deteriorating parkinsonism in the high-dose group was 3.1% greater (95% CI, -7.8% to 14.0%; P = .76) than in the 800-mg/d group, a value that was within the a priori limit of 16% defined as noninferiority. Both doses of quetiapine were safe and well tolerated. Weight gain was greater in the high-dose group (1.7 kg over 12 weeks; ≥ 7% body weight, n = 11 [12.5%]) versus the 800-mg/d group (1.1 kg over 12 weeks; ≥ 7% body weight, n = 4 [9.3%]). The mean adjusted difference in weight gain (1.3 kg) was greater in the high-dose group (95% CI, 0.0-2.5; P = .044). Symptom severity declined, with no significant difference between groups.
The results did not demonstrate any advantage for use of quetiapine outside the approved dose range.
www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00328978.
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 06/2011; 73(1):13-20. · 5.80 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) compared with quetiapine immediate-release (quetiapine IR) in older patients with Alzheimer's disease with symptoms of psychosis and/or agitation.
This was a 6-week, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised study. Of the 109 patients screened, 100 were randomised to receive quetiapine XR (n = 68) or quetiapine IR (n = 32), at doses of 50 and 25 mg/day, respectively. Treatment was escalated to 100 mg/day by Day 4. At Day 8, a flexible-dose (50-300 mg/day) period began when dose adjustment was made at the investigator's discretion. The primary variable was incidence and type of adverse events (AEs). Secondary variables included efficacy and other safety assessments.
Mean daily doses were 143.6 and 142.0 mg in the quetiapine XR and quetiapine IR groups, respectively. Ninety patients completed the study; only one withdrew (in the quetiapine XR group) because of an AE. Laboratory evaluations identified severe neutropaenia (one patient), mild neutropaenia (three patients) and eosinophilia (five patients); however, these were not reported, as AEs and confounding factors, such as patient age, concomitant illness and medication, made it difficult to determine any relationship to quetiapine treatment. Numerical improvements from baseline were seen across both treatment groups in Neuropsychiatric Inventory frequency × severity total, Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores.
Quetiapine XR dosed up to 300 mg/day was generally well tolerated, with a similar profile to that of quetiapine IR.
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 04/2011; 27(3):296-304. · 2.42 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) once-daily monotherapy for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).
In this 10-week, (8-week active treatment phase and 2-week drug-discontinuation/tapering phase), multicenter, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, Phase III study (D1448C00003: Opal), patients initially received quetiapine XR 150 mg/day or placebo. At Week 2, inadequate responders (<20% reduction in MADRS total score) were up-titrated to 300 mg/day quetiapine XR or matching placebo for the final 6 weeks. Primary endpoint: change from randomization to Week 8 in MADRS total score. Secondary endpoints included: MADRS response (≥50% reduction in total score from randomization) and changes from randomization to Week 8 in HAM-D and CGI-S.
310 patients were randomized. At Week 8, quetiapine XR significantly reduced mean MADRS total score versus placebo (-16.49 vs -13.10, respectively; p<0.01). Mean MADRS score was significantly reduced by quetiapine XR versus placebo at Week 1 (p<0.05). MADRS response rates were significantly greater at Week 8 for quetiapine XR versus placebo (61.9% vs 48.0%, respectively; p<0.05). Significant changes in HAM-D total score and CGI-S were seen at Week 8 for quetiapine XR versus placebo. Withdrawal rates due to AEs were 9.9% and 2.6% for quetiapine XR and placebo, respectively. Common AEs (>10% any group during the randomized phase) for quetiapine XR and placebo, respectively were dry mouth (32.9% and 6.5%), sedation (21.7% and 1.9%), somnolence (20.4% and 5.2%), and headache (10.5% and 10.3%).
The study was not designed to compare quetiapine XR 150 mg/day and 300 mg/day; it was intended to reflect dose titration that might occur in clinical practice.
Quetiapine XR monotherapy is effective in patients with MDD, with symptom improvement seen as early as Week 1, and tolerability results consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.
Journal of affective disorders 01/2011; 128(1-2):83-94. · 3.76 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Primary objective: evaluate the efficacy (time to recurrence of depressive symptoms) of once daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as maintenance monotherapy treatment to prevent relapse for major depressive disorder (MDD).
Time-to-event (maximum 52 weeks), double-blind, multicenter, randomized withdrawal, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine XR (50-300 mg/day) comprising four treatment phases: enrollment (up to 28 days), open-label run-in (4-8 weeks), open-label stabilization (12-18 weeks), and randomization (up to 52 weeks). Seven hundred and seventy-six patients stabilized on quetiapine XR were eligible for randomization (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score ≤12 and Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness [CGI-S] score ≤3); 391 received quetiapine XR and 385 received placebo (same dose as last open-label visit). Primary endpoint: time to recurrence of depressive event from randomization. Secondary outcomes included changes from randomization in MADRS total, CGI-S, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global, and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total scores. Adverse events were recorded throughout.
Risk of recurrence of depressive event was significantly (P<.001) reduced by 66% (HR=.34; 95% CI: .25, .46) in patients randomized to continue with quetiapine XR versus patients randomized to switch to placebo. During the randomized phase, quetiapine XR maintained improvements in secondary outcomes (P<.001 for all): MADRS (0.15 versus 2.03), CGI-S (-0.03 versus 0.23); PSQI global (0.06 versus 1.35), and HAM-A total score (0.20 versus 1.58), respectively. The most common AEs (>10% any group) during the randomized period were headache and insomnia.
Quetiapine XR maintenance therapy significantly reduced the risk of a depressive event in patients with MDD stabilized on quetiapine XR, with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.
Depression and Anxiety 10/2010; 27(10):964-76. · 4.18 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as maintenance monotherapy for patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Time-to-event (anxiety symptom recurrence; maximum 52 weeks) multicenter, randomized-withdrawal, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine XR (50-300 mg/day) following open-label run-in (4-8 weeks) and open-label stabilization (≥ 12 weeks). Primary variable: time from randomization to anxiety event. Secondary variables included: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total, HAM-A psychic/somatic anxiety factors, Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S), and Quality of Life, Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) scores; adverse events (AE) reporting. Four hundred and thirty-two patients, stabilized on quetiapine XR, were randomized to continue quetiapine XR (N=216) or switch to placebo (N=216). Risk of anxiety symptom recurrence was significantly reduced by 81% for quetiapine XR versus placebo: hazard ratio=0.19 (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.31; P<0.001). Fewer patients receiving quetiapine XR (N=22, 10.2%) than placebo (N=84, 38.9%) experienced anxiety symptom recurrence. Significant differences were observed between quetiapine XR and placebo in: HAM-A total, psychic/somatic, CGI-S (all P<0.001) and Q-LES-Q (P<0.05) scores. AEs (>10%) during open-label treatment were dry mouth, sedation, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, and constipation. During randomized treatment, the most common AEs for quetiapine XR were headache and nasopharyngitis. Quetiapine XR monotherapy reduced the risk of anxiety symptom recurrence in patients with GAD stabilized on quetiapine XR, with tolerability results consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.
International clinical psychopharmacology 09/2010; 26(1):11-24. · 3.35 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Two positive studies evaluated adjunctive extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) showing inadequate response to antidepressant treatment. This preplanned, pooled analysis provides an opportunity for subgroup analyses investigating the influence of demographic and disease-related factors on observed responses. Additional post hoc analyses examined the efficacy of quetiapine XR against specific depressive symptoms including sleep.
Data were analysed from two 6-week, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled studies, prospectively designed to be pooled. Patients received once-daily quetiapineXR 150mg/day (n=309), 300mg/day (n=307) or placebo (n=303) adjunctive to ongoing antidepressant therapy. The primary endpoint was change from randomisation to Week 6 in MADRS total score. Other assessments included MADRS response (≥50% decrease in total score) and remission (total score≤8), change from randomisation in HAM-D, HAM-A, PSQI global and CGI-S scores.
Quetiapine XR (150 and 300mg/day) reduced MADRS total scores vs placebo at every assessment including Week 6 (-14.5, -14.8, -12.0; p<0.001 each dose) and Week 1 (-7.8,-7.3,-5.1; p<0.001 each dose). For quetiapineXR 150 and 300mg/day and placebo, respectively at Week 6: MADRS response 53.7% (p=0.063), 58.3% (p<0.01) and 46.2%; MADRS remission 35.6% (p<0.01), 36.5% (p<0.001) and 24.1%. QuetiapineXR 150 and 300mg/day significantly improved HAM-D, HAM-A, PSQI and CGI-S scores at Week 6 vs placebo. Quetiapine XR demonstrated broad efficacy, independent of factors including concomitant antidepressant.
Fixed dosing; lack of active comparator.
Adjunctive quetiapine XR is effective in patients with MDD and an inadequate response to antidepressant therapy, with improvement in depressive symptoms seen as early as Week 1.
Journal of affective disorders 09/2010; 127(1-3):19-30. · 3.76 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study evaluated once-daily extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as adjunctive therapy in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with inadequate response to ongoing antidepressant treatment. In this 8-wk (6-wk active treatment/2-wk post-treatment drug-discontinuation/follow-up), multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study, 446 patients were randomized to quetiapine XR 150 mg/d, 300 mg/d, or placebo adjunct to ongoing antidepressant treatment. The primary endpoint was the change from randomization to week 6 in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. At week 6, MADRS total scores significantly improved with quetiapine XR 300 mg/d vs. placebo (-14.7 vs. -11.7, p<0.01). Quetiapine XR 300 mg/d showed significant improvements vs. placebo for: MADRS total score from week 1 onwards; MADRS response [(> or = 50% total score reduction) 58.9% vs. 46.2%, p<0.05] and remission [(total score < or = 8) 42.5% vs. 24.5%, p<0.01] rates; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) (-13.53 vs. -10.80, p<0.01) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity of illness (CGI-S) change (-1.52 vs. -1.23, p<0.05) at week 6. For quetiapine XR 150 mg/d, improvements were not significantly different vs. placebo, except for MADRS (weeks 1 and 2) and HAMD (week 6) total scores. Withdrawal rates due to adverse events (AEs) were: quetiapine XR 150 mg/d 11.5%, 300 mg/d 19.5%, and placebo 0.7%. The most common AEs (>10%) with quetiapine XR were dry mouth, somnolence, sedation, dizziness, constipation, nausea, insomnia, headache, and fatigue. In this study, quetiapine XR 300 mg/d as adjunctive therapy in patients with MDD with an inadequate response to ongoing antidepressant treatment was effective at week 6. However, the difference from placebo for quetiapine XR 150 mg/d at week 6 was not statistically significant. Both doses studied (150 and 300 mg/d) were effective at week 1 and generally well tolerated.
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 02/2010; 13(7):917-32. · 4.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The efficacy and tolerability of extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) once-daily monotherapy in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) was assessed. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, phase III trial consisted of a 1- to 4-wk enrolment/wash-out period and a 10-wk (8-wk active treatment, 2-wk post-treatment drug-discontinuation) study period; 873 patients were randomized to 50 mg or 150 mg quetiapine XR, 20 mg paroxetine, or placebo. Primary endpoint was change from randomization at week 8 in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) total score. At week 8, all active agents produced significant improvements in HAMA total and psychic subscale scores vs. placebo; HAMA somatic subscale scores were significantly reduced only by 150 mg quetiapine XR. Significant separation from placebo (-2.90) in HAMA total score was observed at day 4 for 50 mg quetiapine XR (-4.43, p<0.001) and 150 mg quetiapine XR (-3.86, p<0.05), but not for paroxetine (-2.69). Remission (HAMA total score 7) rates at week 8 were significantly higher for 150 mg quetiapine XR (42.6%, p<0.01) and paroxetine (38.8%, p<0.05) vs. placebo (27.2%). The most common adverse events (AEs) were dry mouth, somnolence, fatigue, dizziness, and headache, for quetiapine XR, and nausea, headache, dizziness for paroxetine. A lower proportion of patients reported sexual dysfunction with quetiapine XR [0.9% (50 mg), 1.8% (150 mg)] than with placebo (2.3%) or paroxetine (7.4%). The incidence of AEs potentially related to extrapyramidal symptoms was: quetiapine XR: 50 mg, 6.8%, 150 mg, 5.0%; placebo, 1.8%; and paroxetine, 8.4%. Once-daily quetiapine XR is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for patients with GAD, with symptom improvement seen as early as day 4.
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 08/2009; 13(3):305-20. · 4.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Four years ago, the first acoustic droplet ejectors (ADEs) were launched on the market, providing a new generation of high-throughput noncontact liquid handlers that outclassed traditional contact instruments in almost every respect. This introduction of noncontact dispensing has triggered radical changes to the screening/compound management interface. Higher quality is achieved through greater accuracy and precision, whereas lower sample volumes can be used, and 1536 plate formats have become a reliable reality. Prior to the ADE instrument launch, 1536 assay-ready plate preparation was a high-effort enterprise requiring users to spend time developing liquid-handling methods along with daily fine-tuning of instruments to reach the desired level of performance. By overcoming the nanoliter dispensing hurdle and successfully transferring assays to high-density formats, a new dimension for cutting costs has emerged. Once the screening customer has adapted to this new world, the rules of supply can also change, with the traditional automated plate store no longer being necessary when the compound library can be stored in 1536 plates. Processing efficiency recently has been further supported by innovative new automation-friendly solutions such as plate desealers, prolonging the life span of working plate copies. Both cost and waste control have never had a higher profile, and noncontact dispensing contributes to these important areas. In some processes (e.g., when piercing septa), contact dispensing remains the best option, but cost control is still essential, and an innovative solution to minimize DMSO consumption from tip washing has had a big impact on consumable budget without compromising quality.
Journal of Biomolecular Screening 07/2009; 14(5):509-14. · 2.05 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy was evaluated in major depressive disorder (MDD).
This was an 8-week (6-week randomized-phase; 2-week drug-discontinuation/tapering phase), double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. The primary outcome measure was Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score randomization-to-Week 6 change. Other assessments included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, and adverse events (AEs).
723 patients were randomized: 182, 178, 179, and 184 to quetiapine XR 50, 150, 300 mg/day, and placebo, respectively. At Week 6, significant reductions occurred in MADRS score with quetiapine XR 50 mg/day (-13.56; P<.05), 150 mg/day (-14.50; P<.01) and 300 mg/day (-14.18; P<.01) versus placebo (-11.07); at Day 4, reductions for quetiapine XR (titrated to 50 or 150 mg/day according to dose group) versus placebo (-2.9) were: -4.7 (P<.01), -5.2 (P<.001), and -5.1 (P<.001), respectively. At endpoint, MADRS response (>or=50% reduction in score) was 42.7% (P<.01), 51.2% (P<.001), and 44.9% (P<or= .001) for quetiapine XR 50, 150, and 300 mg/day, respectively; 30.3% for placebo. Overall, quetiapine XR 150 mg/day provided consistently more positive secondary efficacy results than 50 mg/day and 300 mg/day versus placebo. The most common AEs in quetiapine XR-treated patients were dry mouth, sedation, somnolence, headache, and dizziness.
In patients with MDD, quetiapine XR monotherapy (50/150/300 mg/day) is effective in reducing depressive symptoms, with improvement from Day 4 onwards. Safety and tolerability were consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.
CNS spectrums 07/2009; 14(6):299-313. · 2.20 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Assay-ready compound plates (ARPs) are sealed assay plates that contain DMSO solutions of screening compounds predispensed for particular assays. Assays are started by adding assay buffer and reagents to the ARPs. This concept offers important logistical advantages for screening such as decoupling of the plate preparation from the screening process and exchange of assay plates between different geographical locations. Compound solutions can be accurately and precisely dispensed by acoustic droplet ejection technology in the small volumes required for screening in the 1536-well format. At such low volumes, however, potential effects such as solvent evaporation, compound degradation, precipitation, or adsorption are reasons for concern with regard to assay reproducibility, performance, and shelf life of ARPs. To address these concerns, the authors screened freshly prepared ARPs using several types of assays. The results were compared to results obtained from plates stored for up to 13 days under 2 storage conditions (22 degrees C, -18 degrees C). Tight correlations between results were found that indicated that temperature and time had very little influence on the assay performance for up to about 1 week storage time of the plates. In addition, using a time series of microphotographs of DMSO droplets, the authors visually confirmed that the sizes of the droplets in ARPs apparently do not change over 13 days under certain storage conditions.
Journal of Biomolecular Screening 07/2009; 14(5):468-75. · 2.05 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The primary study objective was to assess the time course and intensity of sedation after administration of immediate-release (IR) and extended-release (XR) quetiapine fumarate in healthy subjects during dose initiation. The tolerability of the 2 formulations was also evaluated.
This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 2-period crossover study in healthy adult (age 18-50 years) subjects. It employed the dose-initiation schedule used in studies of the 2 quetiapine formulations in patients with bipolar depression: 50 mg on day 1, 100 mg on day 2, 200 mg on day 3, and 300 mg on days 4 and 5. Doses were administered in the morning. The primary end point was the level of sedation 1 hour after dosing on day 1, as rated by subjects using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 = alert to 100 = drowsy. Secondary VAS end points included sedation over a 14-hour period on day 1, and on days 2 through 5. Blood was drawn on day 5 of both periods for determination of plasma drug concentrations by a liquid chromatography method with tandem mass-spectrometric detection. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study.
Sixty-three subjects were enrolled in the study, comprising the safety population. The perprotocol population consisted of 58 subjects (79.0% male, 21.0% female; 67.2% black, 24.1% white; mean age, 31.8 years; mean weight, 80.7 kg). One hour after dosing on day 1, sedation was significantly greater with quetiapine IR than with quetiapine XR (mean VAS score, 33.2 vs 11.3, respectively; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in sedation between formulations at 7 hours after dosing (64.5 and 53.6), 8 hours after dosing (46.9 and 50.8), or 14 hours after dosing (both, 12.7). On day 1, numerically more subjects had a VAS score>75 (substantial sedation) 1 hour after dosing in the quetiapine IR group than in the quetiapine XR group (14 vs 4 subjects). On day 5, the mean (95% CI) quetiapine C(max) for the IR and XR formulations was 689.19 (605.83-784.02) and 381.70 (341.40-426.76) ng/mL; the mean was AUC(0-11) was 2835.89 (2517.92-3194.02) and 2515.21 (2281.76--2772.55) ng . h/mL; and the median T(max) was 2.0 and 5.0 hours. The incidence of any AEs was 21.7% with quetiapine IR and 9.8% with quetiapine XR.
In these healthy subjects, quetiapine XR was associated with a lower intensity of self-reported sedation compared with quetiapine IR. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00702676; Astra Zenecaclinicaltrials.com Identifier: D1443C00033.
Clinical Therapeutics 03/2009; 31(3):492-502. · 2.32 Impact Factor
