-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Proteome fractionation refers to separation at the level of intact proteins. Proteome fractionation may precede sample digestion and subsequent peptide-level separation and detection (i.e., bottom-up mass spectrometry [MS]). For top-down MS, proteome fractionation acts as a stand-alone separation platform, since intact proteins are directly analyzed by the mass spectrometer. Regardless of the MS identification strategy, separation of intact proteins has clear benefits as a result of decreasing sample complexity. However, this stage of the workflow also creates considerable challenges, which are generally absent from the counterpart peptide separation experiment. For example, maintaining protein solubility is a key concern before, during and after separation. To this end, surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulfate may be employed during fractionation, so long as they are eliminated prior to MS. In this article, current strategies for proteome fractionation in a MS-compatible format are reviewed, illustrating the challenges and outlooks on this important aspect of proteomics.
Expert Review of Proteomics 12/2011; 8(6):787-800. · 3.68 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: For bottom-up MS, the digestion step is critical and is typically performed with trypsin. Solvent-assisted digestion in 80% acetonitrile has previously been shown to improve protein sequence coverage at shorter digestion times. This has been attributed to enhanced enzyme digestion efficiency in this solvent. However, our results demonstrate that tryptic digestion in 80% acetonitrile is less efficient than that of conventional (aqueous) digestion. This is a consequence of decreased enzyme activity beyond ~40% acetonitrile, increased enzyme autolysis and lower protein solubility in 80% acetonitrile. We observe multiple missed cleavages and reduced concentration of fully cleaved digestion products. Nonetheless we confirm, through room temperature solvent-assisted digestion, a consistent improvement in protein sequence coverage when analyzed by mass spectrometry. These results are explained through the increased number of unique digestion products available for detection. Thus, while solvent-assisted digestion has clear merits for proteome analysis, one should be aware of the inefficiency of protein digestion though this protocol, particularly with absolute protein quantitation experiments.
Analytica chimica acta 10/2011; 703(2):194-203. · 4.31 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Solution isoelectric focusing (sIEF) is evaluated relative to ion exchange chromatography (IEC) as a preferred charge-based prefractionation tool for proteome mixtures. While IEC is extensively employed for proteome prefractionation prior to MS analysis, we demonstrate here that conventional salt gradient IEC has significant shortcomings compared to sIEF. Here, we critically evaluated a custom eight-channel sIEF device for intact protein separation, relative to strong cation exchange (SCX) and strong anion exchange (SAX) chromatography. The resolution, recovery, and uniformity of separation obtained with our sIEF device were comparable or superior to that of optimized IEC separations. Most importantly for intact proteins, sIEF separations strongly correlate with the proteins' isoelectric point, which contrasts with IEC where no correlation was observed. To validate the sIEF platform for proteome analysis, prefractionation through sIEF resulted in the confident identification of a greater number of proteins from yeast (211) following LC-MS/MS, relative to those obtained through SAX (173) or SCX (148).
Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences 03/2009; 877(8-9):807-13. · 2.78 Impact Factor
