Malcolm J Scoble

Publications (2)9.17 Total impact

• Article: Taxonomy as an eScience.

  Benjamin R Clark, H Charles J Godfray, Ian J Kitching, Simon J Mayo, Malcolm J Scoble
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: The Internet has the potential to provide wider access to biological taxonomy, the knowledge base of which is currently fragmented across a large number of ink-on-paper publications dating from the middle of the eighteenth century. A system (the CATE project) is proposed in which consensus or consolidated taxonomies are presented in the form of Web-based revisions. The workflow is designed to allow the community to offer, online, additions and taxonomic changes ('proposals') to the consolidated taxonomies (e.g. new species and synonymies). A means of quality control in the form of online peer review as part of the editorial process is also included in the workflow. The CATE system rests on taxonomic expertise and judgement, rather than using aggregation technology to accumulate taxonomic information from across the Web. The CATE application and its system and architecture are described in the context of the wider aims and purpose of the project.
  Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 01/2009; 367(1890):953-66. · 2.77 Impact Factor
• Source

  Available from: royalsocietypublishing.org

  Article: Unitary or unified taxonomy?

  Malcolm J Scoble
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Taxonomic data form a substantial, but scattered, resource. The alternative to such a fragmented system is a 'unitary' one of preferred, consensual classifications. For effective access and distribution the (Web) revision for a given taxon would be established at a single Internet site. Although all the international codes of nomenclature currently preclude the Internet as a valid medium of publication, elements of unitary taxonomy (UT) still exist in the paper system. Much taxonomy, unitary or not, already resides on the Web. Arguments for and against adopting a unitary approach are considered and a resolution is attempted. Rendering taxonomy essentially Web-based is as inevitable as it is desirable. Apparently antithetical to the UT proposal is the view that in reality multiple classifications of the same taxon exist, since different taxonomists often hold different concepts of their taxa: a single name may apply to many different (frequently overlapping) circumscriptions and more than one name to a single taxon. However, novel means are being developed on single Internet sites to retain the diversity of multiple concepts for taxa, providing hope that taxonomy may become established as a Web-based information discipline that will unify the discipline and facilitate data access.
  Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences 05/2004; 359(1444):699-710. · 6.40 Impact Factor